tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30978471286951989432024-03-15T12:28:14.652-07:00global politics and economicsGLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.comBlogger313125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-25216492351382644292024-03-02T11:10:00.000-08:002024-03-15T12:27:42.585-07:00 Uchronic history XXIII : the stupefying counter-decision of Adam Weishaupt (1748 - 1830), founder of the "Illuminati of Bavaria" !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>This article is trying to clarify things about the famous "Illuminati of Bavaria", simply called "The Illuminati" by most people worldwide nowadays in a confused way. In the mind of people at least, they would have survived. The thrilling "Angels and demons" of Dan Brown (born in 1964 in Exeter, New Hampshire, USA), published in 2000, and the movie of 2009 are certainly for something in this renewed fame !</p><p>Our angle of presentation is different. It is based upon the own defense of Adam Weishaupt, founder of "the Circle of Perfectibilists" on May 1st, 1776 (renamed "Illuminati of Bavaria" afterwards), in front of the authorities of Bavaria, in Munich (now Germany) from 1784. <i>Those Illuminati became clearly a movement of "Awakening" and "Enlightenment", as suggested in their name. And they were initially famous for their fight against any form of Despotism, and that's certainly why they were feared !</i></p><p>Nowadays, the "Illuminati" have become a generic and globalizing name. And they are considered by many as the most powerful Secret Society of our planet, ranking even above the legendary "Committee of 300". Thus a certain confusion is reigning with this word, which covers presently a concept or a pattern more than an Order. Between fantasy and reality, it's not so simple to have a realistic and objective opinion about the original model. Hence, we have to study the way the "Illuminati of Bavaria" were created in Ingolstadt (nicknamed "Eleusis") in the XVIII th century - the century of "Enlightenment", and which was specific to them in their own right !</p><p>Johann Adam Weishaupt was born on February 6th, 1748 in Ingolstadt (Bavaria), and he died peacefully in Gotha (Thuringia, presently Germany too) on November 18th, 1830. He was known at the beginning as a theologian and a professor of Canonical Law in the University of Ingolstadt (1775 - 1785). And actually he started his Secret Society with only four of his pupils the year after, with teachings based upon Zarathustra, the Egyptian culture, the Greek-Roman wisdom, the Kabbalah, and Saint John the Evangelist...but not the Templar teachings !</p><p>The stupefying counter-decision we are going to talk about was taken in the summer 1782, six years later after the success had come. It is concerning the promotion of revolutions and regicide, a bit too quickly attributed to the Secret Society he had created in 1776 : it is involving the planned French Revolution and King Louis XVI, as well as his wife Queen Marie-Antoinette !</p><p>After the preventive condemnation to death of King Louis XVI during the summer 1782, in the Convent of Wilhelmsbad (near Hanau in Hesse), Weishaupt who totally disagreed with the decision of the Count of Saint Germain (1691 or 1710 - 1784) decided to counter-attack : that's why we are talking about his counter-decision, which was stupefying !</p><p>As a lawyer himself, Adam Weishaupt always considered that the rights of the defence should have been respected : to him, the French King didn't do anything wrong. And he thought that the "despotic" judgement of a dark adventurer, seeming to come from nowhere and pretending to be an "immortal Rose-Cross", had strictly no value. Weishaupt who had also studied Alchemy, had both big doubts about the concepts of Time and Space of Saint Germain, and no doubt about his duplicity towards King Louis XVI and Queen Marie-Antoinette ! </p><p>Curiously, the Saint Germain glimpsed by Weishaupt was quite close to the tyrannical and megalomaniac being recently described in the "Trilogy of gems" written in 2009 and 2010 by Kerstin Gier (born in Bergish Gladbach, Germany, in 1966). Three fantastic romantic stories about him, Gwendolyn, Gideon, and other characters have been adapted to the cinema by the Directors Felix Fuchssteiner (born in Paderborn, Germany, in 1975) and Katharina Schöde (born in Cologne, Germany, in 1974) : "Ruby red" (2013), "Sapphire blue" (2014) and "Emerald Green"(2016) !</p><p>Your reading of this new article of Uchronic history may shake a lot of preconceived ideas you had about the Illuminati of Bavaria, who were often accused of what they didn't really do. So sit down, take a breathe, and get ready to rediscover them, through their past history and <i>their quite paradoxical role in the French Revolution of 1789. </i>Of course, you can make a pause after each part, and continue to read after. Anyhow, enjoy your reading !</p><p> ******</p><p><i>Johann Adam Weishaupt has certainly created one of the most famous Secret Societies on Earth.</i> In 1784, he was badly criticized and even slandered by the Rose-Cross of Innsbrück, presenting itself as the real heiress of the Templars, near the Prince Elector of Bavaria. The fact Weishaupt had opposed the defunct Count of Saint Germain was more determining than the beliefs, which were not so different in reality. But the result was not good for it either : all societies not previously approved were prohibited on his territory, by an Edict of June 22nd, 1784 ! So the "the Order of The Illuminati of Bavaria" ("Der Illuminatenorden von Bayern" in German) was not the only one to be touched, in this fear of any potentially revolutionary movement. <i>Surprisingly, a second Edict was necessary to dissolve the latter officially, on March 2nd, 1785. Yet, his Order still survived in Bavaria till mid-1787, and elsewhere without precision of dates. So it's entirely true that the Order didn't disappear at all in 1785 ! That's why Charles Theodore of Bavaria (1724 - 1799) had to take a third Edict in August 1787, to confirm the prohibition of the Order of Illuminati in Bavaria and sentence to death all his members, </i>who had already fled away. <i>Johann Joachim Bode (1731 - 1793), called</i> <i>"Aemilius"</i> who had represented Weishaupt in Wilhelmsbad, then replaced him in appearance, as second Grand Master. Bode was the editor of Goethe ("Abaris", 1749 - 1832) and Herder ("Damasus pontifex", 1744 -1803), equally members. <i>He was thereafter sent to France in 1787</i> to meet the "Philalethes" in Strasbourg and Paris, and establish links with them. <i>And he never encouraged any Revolution in France against the King. It is important to notice Weishaupt ruled under the form of "Areopagus" (the Council of Nine), so then in case of necessity or emergency, a member chosen in advance could replace him easily. </i>Just at the end of the troubled period of the French Revolution, the Jesuit Abbot Augustin de Barruel (1741 - 1820) thought that Weishaupt (a previous Jesuit theologian himself) had been able to maintain his leadership, by infiltrating the blue grades of Free Masonry if not the red ones, and other initiation Orders [cf. "Memoirs illustrating the history of Jacobinism", 1797-1799]. And nowadays, his famous Order seems to be surviving in the mind of people at least, like a "ghost organization", through the world reputation it has acquired. Weirdly, even it is said to be extinct, it could well be that the Owl (its symbol) holding an open book between its wings or its legs, is taking off at certain nights !</p><p>The Order of Illuminati is part of the philosophy of lights ("Aufklärung"), and aims at promoting the improvement and social progress of humanity. There are two versions concerning this replacement name. In the first version, the change of name of the "Circle of Perfectibilists" for the "Order of Illuminati of Bavaria", came after Weishaupt had listened a speech of Hans Heinrich von Ecker und Eckhoffen (1750 - 1790), founder of "the Order of the knights and brothers of Saint John the Evangelist of Asia in Europe", in 1778. And in the second version, he did it in 1780, with the arrival of a new important member who helped him to reorganize the rituals, the Baron Adolph von Knigge (1752 - 1796). Anyhow, the Illuminati seemed to run faster than time. As a matter of fact, they have quickly been associated with the success of the American Revolution, which started on July 4th, 1776 (only two months after the creation of the first "Circle" in Bavaria, so before it had changed its name). But according to Weishaupt, the Anglo-Saxons in America rapidly came back to their old habits. So you can see the influence of the Order went further than the Rhineland countries, Austria and Switzerland. And about the spread of Revolution everywhere else supposedly sought by his Order to conquer the world, he has always denied such an accusation. To him, his influence worldwide has been completely exaggerated or at least misinterpreted : others, who had denounced or abandoned him, were clearly more revolutionary than him. Above that it was wrong, as it wasn't true he wanted to unsettle the whole world with sudden Revolutions, but just to improve his adepts morally, and to elevate them in a better world and environment. <i>As a first precision, Adolph von Knigge left him in 1784, because him was a real revolutionary ; and he was discontent that Weishaupt was too peaceful and not wanting to spread Revolutions !</i></p><p><i>1784 was definitively a bad year for Weishaupt, but less than for the defunct Count of Saint Germain. As a matter of fact, the Illuminati had also been accused by a member who was feeling rejected (the public auditor Joseph von Utzschneider renamed "Hellenicus Lesbius" - 1763 - 1840),</i> <i>to be secretly in favor of the Empire of Austria,</i> to admit suicide, to prefer passion to reason, to consider religion as an absurdity...and to eliminate their opponents (except him strangely). The accusation was taken seriously only concerning Austria, because in 1779 the Emperor Joseph II (1741 - 1790), brother of Queen Marie-Antoinette of France had already annexed a part of Bavaria. No wonder Weishaupt had problems with the Prince Elector of Bavaria and the authorities of Munich, and had to leave Ingolstadt in 1785 and to exile to Gotha ! In Gotha justly, he was welcome by the Prince Elector Ernst II von Saxe-Gotha-Altenbourg (1745 - 1804), a new member of his Order since 1783 (under the Order name of "Walter Fürst"). So the Illuminati survived at least in Saxony for an undetermined period. Some say they even expanded to Italy and Russia, which is incredible for an organization presumed to be dead since 1785. And nowadays paradoxally, his Order is presented as definitely materialistic, deist and "republicanist". About Materialism, it is certainly associated with the cult of reason, and then down-to-earth.<i> Concerning "Deism", it doesn't mean at all atheism in reality, but the opposite :</i> <i>the Owl is clearly recalling the Greek Goddess of Wiseness, Athena (Minerva for the Romans).</i> Again, the supreme secret grade of the Illuminati was not "Man-President" but <i>"Man-King" (the personal rank of Weishaupt, with Grand Master). </i>And oddly enough, in<i> the "Exercitia Spiritualia"</i> <i>("Spiritual Exercises") of Saint Ignatius Lopez of Loyola (1491 - 1556) - </i>founder of the Company of Jesus -, published in Roma in 1548, the Kingdom of Jesus Christ was presented in parallel with the one of a King of Earth, chosen by the Lord, that everybody, Princes and Peoples should follow ! </p><p>Weishaupt was taught the teachings of the Templar Strict Observance Order, when he became a member in 1777, as free mason. He wanted to complete his learning. But he was disappointed in his expectations. That's why he finally decided not to be influenced by it, but on the contrary to influence it. And at the same time he chose to rename <i>the "Circle of the Perfectibilists" initially created, the "Order of the Illuminati of Bavaria" : he wanted to show his offensive reorientation. About the expansion of the Order and the rituals, he was also influenced from 1780 by a new member, the baron Adolph von Knigge already mentioned,</i> who was a free mason : <i>the latter became rapidly a prominent member and the right arm of Weishaupt under the name of "Philo"</i>. Simultaneously, <i>he continued to oppose what he called the "Rosicrucian fever",</i> which had been the very reason of his creation in 1776. As a matter of fact, Weishaupt was not a supporter of Alchemy, that he didn't consider as a real science. Unexpectedly the Grand Master of the Templar Strict Observance Order, the Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick (1721 - 1792) became a member of the Illuminati of Bavaria in 1783, under the name of Aaron. And this was showing the power they had acquired in Prussia too. Don't forget Weishaupt was originally formed by the Jesuits, and had created his Order by inspiring himself from the structures and the philosophy of the Jesuit Order ! The fact he criticized it after, just a few years after the Company of Jesus had been dissolved by the Vatican, couldn't erase wholly this strong influence on his thinking and on his choices. <i>Above that, von Knigge who had entered his Order in 1780, left it in April 1784, by accusing Weishaupt of "Jesuitism" justly, and to be in reality "a Jesuit in disguise". So, for him Weishaupt was in truth too Catholic, which was an height for a an Order supposed to be of radical rationalism ! </i></p><p><i>Weishaupt had chosen the Order name of "Spartacus" by humility, and to show his personal fight against despotic organizations falsely presenting themselves as in favor of the People. </i>And on the "republican" question, <i>he wanted to clear things in 1787 in his "Introduction to my apology". </i>He very strongly denied to be pro-regicide, by reminding the followers of his powerful Order had to respect the social order of the time. And it's true Bavaria was led by a Prince Elector, not by a President. And he was also echoing to the condemnation to death of Louis XVI decided in advance in 1782 by the controversial Count of Saint Germain, in the Convent of Wilhelmsbad. Weishaupt was certainly happy to see the entry of his followers in the masonic lodges ratified at the end of this Convent, but he hadn't yet subdued completely the Templar Strict Observance Order. Then, he couldn't feel fully satisfied. Above that, as previously said <i>he totally disagreed with the planned regicide of the Count of Saint Germain : he was seeing it as a very unfair decision, totally contradictory with the fact the Lodges were abandoning the Templar reference at the same time. Moreover, he was shocked by his attitude towards the French Crown, him who had served Louis XV (1710 - 1774). That's why he took the counter-decision to make it aborted. </i>The famous Giovanni Giacomo Casanova (1725 - 1798), who was himself free-mason, disliked totally Saint Germain that he was finally holding for a conjurer and a skilled impostor. And even Cagliostro (1743 - 1795), Saint Germain's disciple was often doubting of him : he was finding him too authoritarian, manipulative, and theatrical. But it's true that Cagliostro about him, dreamed to be able to reconcile the Rose-Cross with the Catholic Church !</p><p>Again in his "Introduction to my apology", Adam Weishaupt is showing he doesn't accept that the documents of his order found after a great storm, as well as other documents in the hands of Bavarian authorities could be used by some people to create an harmful confusion. He even rebels strongly. All what was attributed in bad to the Illuminati thereafter, was malevolently used against him and his creation, by causing even problems to his wife and his children. So the bad things attributed to his famous Order, were in fact the ones of liars and manipulators including the encouragement to "regicide". And from Gotha where he had taken refuge till his death, under the protection of his Prince - not a President then -, he did the impossible as "Man-King" to disarm them ! <i>On the point of the symbolic "beheading of the King and Queen" in the "Chymical Marriage" dear to the Count of Saint Germain, the Alchemist, he might have prevented them in extremis with the conjunction of the quite questionable executions of Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?) and Marie-Antoinette (1755 - 1793 or 1834 ?)...and the two utterly stunning rescue operations of the Baron Jean de Batz (1754- 1822) with Doubles. </i>And it is not a great secret that Jean de Batz had connections with the Jesuits, hiding the way they could after their dissolution by the Pope in 1773. <i>The latters were notably welcome in Mohilev - presently in Belarus -, by the Great Catherine (1729 - 1796)...before their quite surprising Resurrection in 1814 ! </i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p>In his writing of 1787, Weishaupt shows he is fighting so that the work of his life, the Order of Illuminati of Bavaria is not stripped of its essence, nor misguided by manipulators or provocative agents. To prevent such infiltration, there was the filter of a long list of questions to ask the candidates, throughout their initiatory journey. And the Illuminati struggles against ignorance and prejudice were traits common with most initiatory movements. <i>"In our case, it is not the condition, the reputation, etc. that decides. It is the wisest and the best who is reigning, but without anybody knowing he is reigning", did he write !</i></p><p>And in 1788, Johann Heinrich Faber (1742 - 1791), jurist, writer and translator, completed the apology of Weishaupt to himself, with the publication of "The true primitive Iluminati rituals" : Novice, Minerval (after the name of Minerva), Illuminatus minor and Illuminatus major. He wrote that he was neither member of this Order, nor of any initiatory movement. He just did it to give an honest description of the Illuminati philosophy, out of a desire for transparency and fair play. Concerning the nine following grades divided into two other classes, he didn't give any detail. Then, there were 13 grades in total !</p><p>"P.M.C.V." was the Order's motto, written on the book kept open by the Owl : "Per Me Caeci Vident (Through me the blind see)" : this was reminiscent of the Chapter 9 of the Gospel according to Saint John, and showed the Order was respecting Religion...so not only the Olympian religion of Minerva (Goddess Athena, also called Pallas in the rituals). And 5 was the sacred number of Weishaupt, perhaps because he had started his "Circle of Perfectibilists" ("Bund der Perfektibilisten" in German) with only four of his pupils ? </p><p><i>About the Count of Saint Germain, he wasn't so immortal as he died gnawed by rheumatism officially, on February 27th, 1784 in Eckernförde (Schleswig-Holstein, presently Germany) : had he misplaced his drinking gold ? In this respect, it has to be noticed that Queen Marie-Antoinette and King Louis XVI had realized, that he was using a lot of theatrical makeup.</i> And when he was removing a part of his makeup, his face was appearing far younger : <i>that was the secret of his "Immortality", </i>and it explains why the year 1710 was more likely his year of birth, after a serious inquiry. Above that, the theory of metempsychosis which was dear to him could make anyone an immortal. <i>Hence, Saint Germain hated Marie-Antoinette and Louis XVI for those reasons : them too, like Weishaupt, had pierced his secret, and this must be known !</i></p><p>In a way, the Revolution of 1789 could break out because of the decisive role of the famous Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de La Fayette (1757 - 1834), the Man of another Grand Master, Philippe d'Orléans (1747 - 1793), Head of the Great Orient of France. Nicknamed "the Eldest Son of the American Revolution", it seems La Fayette also wanted to be "the Eldest Son of the French Revolution" ! About the Duke of Orleans, he sought to use his obedience for his personal interests. As a matter of fact, he was the own cousin of the King and he absolutely wanted his throne. And he was ready to use any mean to succeed in his plan, even he had to vote the death of his relative, Louis XVI, on January 17th, 1793...by failing against all odds in getting the throne of France ! </p><p>It has to be quoted that the Duke of Orleans wasn't followed by all the Free Masons of the Great Orient, far from it. <i>The disorders France knew from the Assembly of Notables (1787-1788) were due to the insistance of La Fayette for "the convocation of a National Assembly". </i>This was finally accomplished on June 20th, 1789, after the beginning of the Estates General which had started on May 5th, 1789 in Versailles ! And on July 15th, 1789, the day after the Storming of La Bastille. he became Commander of the newly created National Guard. And this allowed him to behave like an unofficial "Prime Minister". During the events of 5 and 6 October 1789, it's him who took the fateful decision to bring back the King and his family from Versailles to Paris. Did he really propose the Royal Family to escape from Paris to Compiègne with him on June 28th, 1792 ? And is it true that Marie-Antoinette refused ? The fact is that on August 20th 1792, one day after having been declared "traitor" to the Nation, La Fayette emigrated from France with a squad of fifteen of his men !</p><p>In 1804<i>, i</i><i>n "The lamp of Diogene", Weishaupt wrote : "I considered the supreme power and religion as essential needs of man, but at a time the game and abuses of secret societies didn't know any limit, I wanted those human weaknesses to become profitable for noble purposes". </i>As much he had liked the American Revolution of 1776, as much he had been annoyed with the French Revolution of 1789, with its roars and its greedy "Grand Master" and Prince, "Philip Equality". The latter chose to be called this way in 1792. He seemed weirdly to distance himself from the Great Orient of France in a curious letter of January, 5th, 1793, and was finally guillotined for betrayal of the Revolution on November 6th, 1793... with the best memories of Maximilien de Robespierre (1758 - 1794), the opportunist Dictator ! </p><p>But it's true that now, as we live in a society without tail or head, these historical flashbacks may seem distant and superfluous. Oddly, many young people in France (46% of the 16-24 years old, according to a recent poll of January 2024) don't know when the French Revolution broke out. It's puzzling, especially for the level in history. Is there a pedagogical problem, a difficulty to remember dates, a disinterest for this yet breathtaking period, or a certain confusion towards an epoch which could appear complicated and contradictory sometimes ? </p><div><i>In "the true primitive Illuminati rituals" of Faber (1788), already quoted, it appears that the Illuminati were defending efficiently the Weakened against the Strong, what is rather Christian and even Johannic. Them too shared the noble ideals of Liberty, Equality (called sometimes Equity), and Fraternity. Some even think the Great Orient of France had borrowed this motto from the Illuminati of Bavaria, originally. Anyhow, the latters were</i> quite <i>demanding concerning their concrete application in everyday life, to improve the human beings' future. </i>And this could explain why they could still puzzle us today !</div><div><br /></div><div>Nowadays, with Fantasy prevailing on reality, is it really true the Illuminati of Bavaria would be quite the opposite of their fundamental principles ? The fact is that nobody knows, even it's doubtful. Normally, the question should be completely irrelevant, for an Order which is said to have officially disappeared in 1785. <i>However, just anecdotally, the successor of the substitute of Weishaupt since 1785, Johann Joachim Bode the fife player, was assured by the Austrian philosopher Karl Leonhard Rheinhold ("Decius", 1757 - 1823), from the end of 1793. </i>This tolerant man of humble origin, became in his turn Grand Master of the Illuminati of Bavaria, to represent Weishaupt. <i>His paradoxical links with the Knights of Faith (equally led by a Council of Nine) on the occasion of French Restoration in 1814, are no longer known. </i>After the death of Rheinhold (1823), and especially the one of Weishaupt in 1830, Clarity disappeared and the Order became a ghost organization. That's why the mystery is remaining !</div>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-73399955677357595012024-02-04T01:08:00.000-08:002024-02-14T13:54:53.528-08:00Just science-fiction LIII : Postface to the Apocalypse of Saint John !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p><i>Today, we are going to introduce our Postface - or brief explanatory comment - to the Apocalypse ("Revelation") of Saint John ! </i></p><p>Of course, our interpretation has to be taken as "Just science-fiction" as usually, after the name of one of our mascot series !</p><p>So sit down comfortably in your armchair or your sofa, and enjoy our reading. Just take it as usually as a masterpiece of imagination, and nothing more !</p><p> ******</p><p><i>Nowadays, the Apocalypse of Saint John is mainly studied as a long process to come, and never as a process already almost entirely accomplished. </i>What Saint John himself has effectively written is a subject of questions. He should normally have died as a martyr in front of the Porta Latina in Roma under the Emperor Domitian (81 - 96 AD). But after having been plunged into a cauldron of boiling water or oil, he was rejuvenated and regenerated instead ! <i>Respected and feared for his thaumaturgical and seer powers, </i>he was then exiled on the island of Patmos from 94 to 96 AD, where he wrote the Apocalypse : he was even <i>nicknamed "the Eagle of Patmos", in reference to the prophet Ezekiel, </i>for his hallucinating quasi-Messianic dimension. <i>The key of his writing is that he disliked particularly human meanness, that he didn't consider at all as a venial and very discrete sin, or as a simple "mental dust". There is certainly a huge and fundamental misunderstanding about that, which will be illuminated on the Doomsday and its tomorrows.</i> In 96 after the death of Domitian, he was allowed to come back to Ephesus where he died at the age of 90. <i>His personal writing of the Gospel carrying his name is very largely denied, because he was already dead since a certain time when it was finally achieved</i> ! Thus, this last canonical Gospel appears nowadays to most exegetes as a collective writing of scholars, just using his name for prestige. That's why it's called the "Gospel <u>according</u> to Saint John" and not <u>of </u>Saint John, <i>"Saint John" being then only a generic and collective name, like a brand ! </i></p><p>However, to stay open despite everything, a little doubt is still possible about the short Prolog ("In the beginning was the Verb, and the Verb was God...") and what is now the chapter III of this Gospel concerning Jesus' personality and family or marital life : they might have been a written basis left for posterity by Saint John. The ways of the Lord being impenetrable, who knows after all ? Anyhow, this last canonical Gospel was clearly finished not before, but after the Apocalypse <u>of</u> Saint John about it, around 110 AD or even 125 AD. And in spite of his thaumaturgical powers, nobody thinks he could have come back after his death. Saint John of Zebedee, celebrated every 27 December, was the youngest apostle of Jesus Christ : he wasn't quite an adult at that memorable time (as born around 11 AD, with a Jesus Christ's death and resurrection circa 29 AD). Saint John is remarkable among all the apostles, because he was the preferred one of Jesus, after Maria-Magdalena of course. Both were those who best understood and admired Jesus : they were always his most faithful supporters. They never denied him as Peter, nor betrayed him like Judah !</p><p><i>The Apocalypse is counting 22 chapters, like the number of letters in the Aramaic Consonantal Alphabet (and posterior Hebrew). </i>This alphabet starting with "Alaph" is<i> ending by "Tau"</i> (which importance has been underlined in several of our previous articles of "Just science-fiction") ; and it is said to have been given by the Pleiadians. This detail must be recalled in connection with <i>"the Tau-IX Treaty for the Preservation of Humanity" of 1958, between several groups of ETs and the USA.</i> However the Pleiadians have refused to sign it, both to respect their divine mission and not to transfer a part of their highly advanced technology to America, unlike<i> the various Greys for instance. </i>"Tau" is standing for the World, and "IX" for Completion, as every 9 years this Treaty is achieved and has to be renegociated. We are quoting the Pleiadians because a very important role is attributed to them by the Apocalypse, even they are not directly named so in. They are called "Angels" like Aldebarans, their counterparts playing also a determining interaction and a key-role in the whole process. If you have read our previous articles of "Just science-fiction", you know already some common characteristics about both of them !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>On the Doomsday, the Dead will be revived and judged with the Living by Jesus Christ during the Parousia. </i>It means that they will be reborn through the same body after their resurrection (not reincarnation then). And this curious process, seemingly impossible at the moment, is called <i>"Meteomsomatosis"</i>. It is thus different from the Metempsychosis of the famous Pythagoras of Samos (c. 570 - c. 495 BC) !</p><p><i>The mecanism of Meteomsomatosis is involved with the fundamental and natural element that is Carbon on our Earth. </i>That's why the present world war against CO2 (Carbonic Gas) could be seen as a simplistic, empirical, and may be vain attempt to escape the Apocalypse. This must be quoted, beside the unsaid world war to the Zeta Reticulian and Rigelian expansion on Earth. As a matter of fact, small Greys and tall Greys (their controllers), like plants, need CO2 to breathe well on Earth, still more than the descendants of Martian survivors - in much smaller numbers - in Antarctica and in Tierra del Fuego (South America). The secret of Uranides has been well kept ! </p><p><i>After the Doosmday inadvertently provoked by the uncontrollable agressivity of human beings,</i> the Pleiadian Angels have to proceed to "the Great Rapture" of the elected ones (144 000 people only). 666 is the number of human beings, and not uniquely of a single individual or even the two Beasts of the Apocalypse (Chapter 13). The Doomsday might finally happen, because the Pleiadians and the Aldebarans are tired of spending their time disabling the ICBMs or nuclear tactical missiles created by human beings, sometimes with the unexpected support of the various Greys ! </p><p>The Slavonic translation of the star "Absinthe" ("Wormwood") in the Apocalypse of Saint John is clearly the star "Chernobyl" ! However, many people who are considering themselves as already "chosen" on Earth, might have an enormous final surprise. Anyhow, the ultimately chosen ones will be taken in the Pleiadians' (and finally may be too the Aldebarans') huge vessels from Earth to another similar planet : possibly the still unknown "Herna". And on this new planet, they will have to start a new life like Adam and Eve did on Earth. Whatever it will be like a new Eden is just suggested !</p><p><i>So a very small number of people would be saved </i>on a highly populated planet now (8 billion inhabitants). As a matter of fact, Earth is officialy affected by an apparently irremediable climatic change : the secret of the Meadow, able to absorb Carbon and to regenerate itself up to 50 times more quickly than the Forest with an equivalent effect on the level of Oxygen produced, is remaining rather ignored. It is marked also by various natural cataclysms, world crisis, pestilence, and finally by the suicidal option of another World War, the most terrible of all !</p><p><i>Then various explanations to this limited number of saved people are presently possible.</i> First, there is human meanness, which claims to be Antichristian and natural, animals being often more "humanitarian" than human beings in that case : it would be Darwinist by nature, beyond what Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) himself wrote far after Saint John. Second, at the time of Saint John the world population was far smaller (around 250 million people). Third, the Third World War to come probably very soon, should kill a huge number of people on Earth in different ways, including with the terrible nuclear winter that would follow : what is striking today is the lightness with which this subject is treated, in an atmosphere of bluff of the warmonger "pacifists", and the unpreparedness in which their civilian population is kept in this crazy "poker game". And fourth, the capacity of the Pleiadian spaceships will most likely have a certain limit !</p><p>The warnings of <i>Our Lady of Fatima (Portugal, 1917),</i> as well as the more precise ones of <i>Our Lady of all Nations also called Our Lady of Akita (North of Japan, from 1973, with important and repeated cryings from 1975 to 1981),</i> haven't been listened at all. The gigantic submarine earthquake (magnitude 9, this number again), and the ensuing tsunami and nuclear catastrophe of Fukushima, in Northern Japan too - Honshu - on March 11th, 2011, might not have been a simple coincidence. The Apocalypse of Saint John has never been restricted to the Christian orb only, but to whole Earth indistinctly, even <i>it remains a great mystery for human beings !</i></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-73546035909887699062024-01-05T00:53:00.000-08:002024-01-08T01:09:51.356-08:00Woodrow Wilson and his second wife, Edith Bolling Galt, descendant of Princess Pocahontas !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p><i>Edith Bolling Galt (1872 - 1961) married President Woodrow Wilson (1856 - 1924) in 1915. She was a direct descendant of Princess Pocahontas (c. 1596 - 1617), </i>daughter of the King of Powhatans (Algonquin Redskins), Wahunsunacock. As some people know, Pocahontas fell in love with John Smith (1579-1580 - 1631), the handsome Captain of the British Expedition to the New World. And this love made possible the establishment of Jamestown in the newly called Virginia (1607) and the famous Virginia Company of London. The latter which merged with the Plymouth Company, under the simplified name of Virginia Company has officially been dissolved in 1624. Yet nowadays, some people think it's still existing in Bermuda (UK) !</p><p>With the Virginia company and after 1624, America was submitted to the rules of British Admiralty. Normally, this should have ceased after the Declaration of independence of America on July 4th, 1776. And it effectively ceased...till the Jay Treaty of November 19th,1794, when British Maritime Law was anew enforced. It was ratified by the Senate on June 24th, 1795. It's called the Jay Treaty, because it has been negotiated by the American diplomat John Jay (1745 - 1829) between the British Crown and the USA, to solve unresolved issues since the Treaty of 1783. It allows between other things the indigenous people of Canada to live and work freely in the USA. And nowadays, this interconnection with Canada is remaining as a background agreement of the past ! </p><p>There was also at that time a terrible fear that the most extremist ideas of the French Revolution could spread in the nascent USA, like a plague. French Great Louisiana was extending from Bâton Rouge to the border of Canada : it was roughly as big as the USA of the time - concentrated on the Eastern side of the country as for them. George Washington (1732 - 1799) had a terribly bad opinion of the French Revolutionaries that he considered as "Apaches" : he wrote it to La Fayette (1757 - 1834), by reproaching his friend to have associated with such brigands, without faith nor law. Thus, to prevent Terror to succeed in America with the emergence of a dictatorship as it had happened in the Kingdom of France, the British Admiralty was given by the Jay Treaty the right to visit American ships in search of French revolutionaries of the Colonists' party. This treaty written by Alexander Hamilton (1757 - 1804) and supported by George Washington, was criticized by Jeffersonians. And it is at the origin of bipartisme in the USA, with the pro-British Federalist Hamiltonian Party (replaced by Democrats) opposed to the Jeffersonian Republican party, which was initially pro-French !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>In October 1919, President Thomas Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, was victim of a vascular cerebral accident. It left him paralyzed of the left side of his body (hemiplegia). So normally he was inapt to go on his duty of President. But this was hidden from the American public for long. And in agreement with his doctor and his cabinet, his wife became the woman- in-between to transmit the will of the President. Nowadays, a lot of people think that she had sometimes acted on her own, even she had always been very modest on her exact role. Everybody is admitting yet, that she was a caring and devoted wife to her ill husband, a model for America then. But it remains that till his retirement on March 4th, 1921, <i>this descendant of Princess Pocahontas is the one who might have lead secretly the USA !</i></p><p>Woodrow Wilson had become President on March 4th, 1913. He is known for having created the famous Federal Reserve Bank in 1913, the income tax in the USA, the Federal Commission Act, and the Clayton Antitrust Act to defend the less favoured classes. He is also the one who put an end to the American isolationism which had lasted roughly one century, by entering the Ist World War in 1917. And he is too the one who suggested the creation of the League of Nations in 1918, even if his country didn't become a member at the end. Then, historically, his presidency had a pivotal role, including during his long illness !</p><p>Edith Bolling Galt had met for the first time Woodrow Wilson, when visiting one cousin of the president in the White House : Helen Woodrow Bones, on March 18th, 1915. He had been widower of Ellen Louise Axson (1860 - 1914) since 1914, and he fell in love with Edith at the first glance. At the beginning, she didn't accept his proposal of marriage in May 1915. As a matter of fact, Wilson as a Virginian equally was a Southerner. But he was able to demonstrate her he didn't despise Indians and their rights. And finally she accepted his proposal : they became engaged in September 1915, and married on December 18th,1915. <i>Mrs Edith Wilson has been nicknamed by some historians "the secret President" for her role beside Woodrow Wilson at the head of the USA !</i></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>For many people, especially in Europe (and singularly in France), the Story of Pocahontas - "The Playful One" or "The Young Untamed One" - is just a very successful musical animated movie of Walt Disney productions. The first one is ending on the departure for London of Captain John Smith, badly injured by Governor Ratcliffe. As it was released under the title "Pocahontas, an Indian legend" (1995), a lot of parents have mainly taken it as a simple Christmas tale for children. And it is mostly the children who consider this quite charming and beautiful animated movie as a true story - what it is with some adaptations - , and the explanation of the Anglo-Saxon predominance in America in front of other European powers !</p><p>Similarly, when Edith Wilson accompanied her husband to Europe to visit troops in 1918, and to sign the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 after the end of the Ist World War, nobody made any connection with the travel of Pocahontas to Europe (England). And yet the story of "Pocahontas II : Journey to a new world" ( the second musical animated movie of Walt Disney productions about her, 1998) really happened too ! The difference is the film is just ending on the beginning of her return to America with the beloved Captain John Rolfe (c. 1585 - 1622). It doesn't talk of the boy she had from John Rolfe after her baptism and her marriage under the name of Rebecca Rolfe : Thomas Rolfe (1615 - 1675) and his later descendance through the settler John Bolling (1676 - 1729) !</p><p>It is important to notice that it was at the end of the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, the Executive power appeared particularly predominant on the Legislative power of the Congress. A remarkable shift of power happened then, with a total rebalancing. And since Woodrow Wilson (and his wife Edith, the descendant of the Indian Princess Pocahontas), things didn't change much ! </p><p>At last, President Wilson (or his wife Edith ?) granted notably the unconditional right to vote to women in 1920, with the suppression of the unfair Poll Tax in all the states of the Union (XIX th amendment to the Constitution, of August 18th, 1920). And few people have noticed at that time, that his wife Edith Wilson was assuming the full charge of her ill husband and of his presidency, as a top and efficient first Lady !</p><p>Edith Wilson is remaining in the American history as a fine and amazing wife. Everybody agrees she was totally devoted to her husband, she loved sincerely. Opinions are only varying on her role beside him when he became ill : did she lead secretly the USA, or not so much ? Their tight-knit couple is still nowadays appearing touching and remarkably efficient, in front of adversity ! </p><p>They both succeeded in the biggest challenge or aim of two people simply loving each other : becoming one till the end. And the idea Edith Wilson had of love was very similar to the one of Princess Pocahontas : by following the Powhatan philosophy, this Indian (Amerindian) Princess originally called Amonute ("Little Brave Warrior") and Matoaka or "Flower between two streams", thought life was made to love and to be loved !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-63339609875565371142023-12-05T01:43:00.000-08:002023-12-21T06:39:33.548-08:00Just science-fiction LII : the disturbing and parodic spectrum of a terrestrial invasion !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>____________________________</p><p><br /></p><p>The present period is marked by a persistant worry of Earthlings towards a possible invasion of Earth by ETs. And this apprehension is based upon a diffuse impression something unexpected will happen in a proximate future. <i>In fact this worry is probably exxagerated, as there is a long time it has been done ! </i></p><p>And at that time, human beings didn't exist really under the present shape. They were more like pre-Neandertalians. In reality, humans have been created by ETs. And they have quickly become extremely difficult to handle and control. This is explaining why our title is not only about an ET invasion of Earth, but could also concern half-jokingly an irreversible expansion of humans on Earth, outnumbering from far the one of ETs who preceded us. The latters are supposed having left Earth between 1500 and 1350 BC, and returning now (or more probably having already returned by now) !</p><p>Then the unexpected fact is the ETs' worry about Earthlings, and their huge and uncontrollable growth on Earth. Indeed, most ETs already present on Earth hardly believe in a massive extraterrestrial invasion to come of our planet. <i>Like us and just beside us they are watching at the sky, but they don't see anything coming. So the situation is quite funny and rather comic. </i>And our worry really puzzles them : it is so insistent, that <i>it has become a paradoxical parody.</i> Of course, you can guess our narration has to be taken as a masterpiece of imagination, id est "Just science-fiction" and nothing else, as usually !</p><p> ******</p><p>By following us, ETs start to imagine a potential new civilization they would have bypassed or ignored. And they really wonder which one it could be ? Of course, if they were just <i>"Mantis" (like in the Ridley Scott movie "Alien" of 1979),</i> they would know how to handle them. However, with their more advanced system of observation of the sky and the cosmos,<i> they try to detect any other possible intrusion.</i> But they don't find anything. So they end up by questioning themselves about those supposedly frightening aliens Earthlings are so afraid of the arrival soon ? Everyone scratches their head without understanding !</p><p>The funniest ETs scrutining the sky are certainly Small Greys, as they can become suddenly so agitated. They often push each other when they become nervous. As they thought all the media fuss made around the world war against Carbon was concerning them directly because of their hidden but vital need for CO2, they feel strange to have to worry about another type of ETs totally unknown to them. At the same time, their consumption of jelly and strawberry ice creams is reaching a peak, as it is the only way to soothe their nerves !</p><p>Rigelians (tall Greys), their controllers about them are more concerned about their unpredictable behaviour and their mischievous character, than by an unknown alien threat. And it's the same for their subdivision known from the public under the nickname of "Men in Black". At the contact of Small Greys (Zetas, also called J.Rods A and B, depending on their liking or disliking of human beings), they may often become depressive, and transformed in "Men in beige" - as we already wrote it in the past !</p><p><br /></p><p>About the dominant Pleiadians (the "Angels" of the Bible) and Aldebarans (the ex-"fallen Angels"), they take this so-callled threat of invasion as a joke. And they don't care much, because they know already the role they have to play on the day of Parousia. As a recall, unlike the previous ones, they didn't sign for various reasons the "Treaty of Preservation of Humanity" (the "Tau-IX" Treaty of 1958) with America. And it's the same for the allies of Pleiadians, the Procyonians...or for the wokist Venusians (even if since recently there is a small doubt about them). The core of remaining Martians in Antarctica and Tierra del Fuego in South America, is on the same position as its Aldebarans associates : they are not afraid of any ET invasion on Earth to come ! </p><p>Neither do the Alpha Centaurians and the Sirians. Those Amphibians are just occupied with improving their control of the Seas and Oceans, the Straights (Formosa, Malacca, Ormuz...), and the riches of Africa's subsoil (oil, gas, rare earths, diamonds, uranium often found with gold, copper...). Meanwhile, Tau-Cetians, equally amphibians, have taken their distance with Earth since the incident of 1962 with the USA and its underestimated consequences on november 1963. A particularly moving film was made by Guillermo del Toro (born in Guadalajara, Mexico, in 1964) in 2017, centered on the capture from Latin America, and the final escape of a mistreated amphibian creature in a governmental laboratory of Baltimore ("The shape of water"). In the background, there was the exceptional love story between this "god" and a mute cleaning woman, Elisa Esposito...and the extraordinary end of the story ! </p><p>Concerning the sparkling and mysterious YahYels of the Ishuwa extra-solar planet (descendants of the Lyrans, and considered as Pleiadian hybrids), they prefer continuing to play between the fifth, the fourth and the third dimension, than preocupating with this. They adore pronouncing the word or the name (?) "Agatha", without us knowing the magnificent meaning they attribute to it. They are mostly in search of true and romantic love in their world and on Earth, by adopting a style of Geisha for women : usually, they find it and stick to it ! </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>To conclude, the worry about a Terrestrial invasion to come is widely misunderstood by most ETs. In fact, they have never planned to destroy or damage badly Earth, which they like too much since the dawn of time. It's even the opposite. The last nuclear accident of the nuclear plant of Zaporijjia in Ukraine has anew been stopped dead in its tracks by a joint Pleiadian-Aldebaran intervention, a few days ago : they have miraculously restablished electricity on the night of December 1 to 2, 2023. Often, they think we don't know how to appreciate either our planet, or our own qualities which they admire so much when it's concerning art or writing. They like our capacity of imagination, which we don't use enough in our everyday life to establish more harmony on Earth, with a less aggressive world !</p><p>They are also attracted by our beauty (women as well as men as they are from both genders), and they don't understand at all why so many people nowadays are lowering Beauty in a coward and sneaky manner. For them, it's not a sign of great intelligence. They think we do not respect enough the most beautiful creations of the Supreme Intelligence. They dislike ugliness and organized chaos, and don't share the views of our great deconstructors in any field : the latters appear idiotic and completely suicidal to them. <i>Their common motto is "Ordo ab intelligentia rerum" ("Order from situational intelligence") !</i></p><p>About the Andromedans, who look like us after their reshaping, and can be easily found just about everywhere in the world of music, singing, cinema or theater, they are not worried either of an ET invasion. And they are really enjoying their life on Earth, which is a source of great fun. So finally, the most worried could be in reality the Alpha Dracos in the business and political fields, which brain is only reptilian, and the Intra-terrestrial Reptilians - from Earth about them ! They know that the powerful Pleiadians and Aldebarans (the Angels of the Apocalypse to come) dislike particularly dishonesty towards them !</p><p>At last, a mysterious opening might come from the Vegans (from Vega of the Lyra), who know how to fight, but are paradoxically more peaceful than Earthlings ordinarily : this is true if nobody is stupidly attacking them, of course. It's not certain they are vegetarian unlike the Earthly "Vegans" (Veggies), nor like Cathars in their beliefs, but the encounter to come could be astonishing and illuminating. And at least, they would look like us !</p><p><i>It has to be added about the name of "Vega", that it is also the way the YahYels are calling Earth : "Terra Vega" more precisely, with a certain touch of admiration.</i> Those beautiful beings looking like cute Earthlings from both genders are usually blond, reddish-blond or light brown with Emerald or Sapphire eyes (so green or blue). More rarely, they can also have brown eyes. And their skin can be slightly bluish or coppery. They are charming and like obviously to seduce, which they can do without any difficulty habitually. And they like to establish lasting and dreamy bonds with the human beings pleasing to them...if they deserve it of course. Our species are totally compatible to produce beautiful babies and adults then, with the best qualities of their parents !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-15684286838295526472023-11-18T14:35:00.000-08:002023-11-29T22:43:58.157-08:00Uchronic history XXII : the forgotten inheritage of Ann of Kiev, also called Ann of Russia, Queen of France !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>Nowadays, a lot of people have heard somewhere the name of Ann of Kiev, also called Ann of Russia (the Kievan Russia). But they don't know much about her life, and how important is the inheritage she has left for France, and her homeland as well !</p><p>What you will discover or rediscover may surprise you completely, as you thought she was just a Queen of France out of numerous others. In fact, she was far more than that...from the right beginning !</p><p>So sit down comfortably in your armchair, and listen to what she wants to tell you from the other world : try to hear at her legendary beautiful voice, as if she was a fairy from the land of the snow appearing suddenly to you !</p><p> ******</p><p>Nobody knows exactly when Ann of Kiev or of Russia was born in Kiev. There is even a difference of 12 years between the two possible years of birth (between 1024 and 1036). Strangely this was possible because she looked very young due to her very high cheekbones. Her physical appearance and her great beauty, as well as her strong but charming character, had a tremendous importance on her extraordinary destiny. Before meeting her for his marriage in Reims (May 19th, 1051), the King Henri I of France didn't really find any woman attractive in Paris. So some bad tongues even said he was not attracted by the beautiful sex. Of course, if he was surrounded by ugly women who had no taste mostly, anyone can understand his choosiness and his selective character. However, people easily forget he had been married already once with Mathilda of Frisia (1025 - 1044). <i>And when the grandson of Hugues Capet (c. 936-941 - 996), the elected King - in Senlis on June 1st, 987 -, became a widower, he ordered to find a woman as beautiful and wise as the first one for him !</i></p><p>And this happened with Ann of Kiev or Russia, daughter of Iaroslav I the Wise (978 - 1054), King of the Rus' of Kiev, Prince of Novgorod, and Prince of Rostov notably. When he discovered Princess Ann for the first time at her arrival in Reims, he was deliciously shocked : he had never seen such a beautiful woman, with long blond-red hair, blue-green eyes, and a flexible and slender body. And cherry on the cake, she had to become his wife that very day. He was so thrilled that after having made get her off her cart by holding her delicate hand, he had a virile urge : he kissed her on the mouth (Russian way) with passion in front of all the people assembled before the cathedral for her marriage and crowning. The People liked it, and applauded the royal couple. She was going to stay one of the most popular Queen France ever had. At that moment, Ann said to Henri I that she had never met before : <i>"I suppose you are my husband, the King ?" And he answered "yes" while smiling with delightfulness !</i></p><p><i>Henri I (1008 - 1060) who thought he w</i>as<i> suddenly the happiest and the luckiest man in the world, always carried his conjugal duty with eagerness and ardour. He had four children with her : Philippe, Robert (a strong boy who died early), Emma (who didn't survive) and Hugues (a very weak boy who became stronger). And the stupid tongues saying he didn't like women became more silent</i>. On her side, the new Queen Ann of France never showed any sign of shyness, which he appreciated. In fact, she wasn't shy because deep down she was a strong woman, sure of herself and her power of fascination on men. In her country called the "Rus' of Kiev", the Kievan Russia (mother of present Russia), Queen Ann had learnt how to fight men with a kind of "pre-Samoz" - an impressive Slav wrestling resembling coincidentaly to a sort of pre-Aïkido - from orthodox monks ; and she had equally been taught how to fence efficiently and swiftly with a sword. For that matter, she sometimes liked to carry the sword at her side like a man...and she wasn't stingy with demonstration. Astonishingly, she was at same time an excellent musician of "guzli" (an Ukrainian type of guitar), and quite an enchantress singer !</p><p>Henri I and Ann could marry without any religious obstacle, because the wedding happened three years before the Great Schism of July 16th, 1054, between the Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church. It was the unique time in history an Ukrainian or Russian Princess could marry a French King. Queen Ann was a full Queen, so not just the wife of the King. She could subtly decide in certain matters, from free education of Royal serfs with a new livery offered (her new "mujiks") to some points of the organization of the Kingdom with nascent communes - on the more efficient Slav model. He was quite attracted by his wife.<i> In return, she taught him how to be a stronger and more strictly obeyed King in front of the Grands of the Kingdom : in the Kievan way towards the subserving boyars.</i> <i>She therefore played a decisive role in the strengthenting of the very young Capetian dynasty and the Royal Power in France, for the centuries to come !</i> And don't forget she had had an excellent formation to horse riding, hunting, swimming and water fighting, the handling of weapons (spear and dagger included), and the siege of castles in the Rus' of Kiev. She had been educated like a boy with her three brothers in her youth, and she never liked much spinning - even she accepted to do it to behave like a Dame !</p><p>So when her husband died in 1060, she strongly held her position of reigning Queen of France. And things didn't happen at all the way the Grands of the Kingdom of France had planned. With her nothing never went on the classical way : lilies ran soft with her. <i>And the saying "the lilies do not spin in the Kingdom of France" was never relevant in her case !</i> She had accepted to spin and embroider to please her surrounding since her arrival in France. This way she had satisfied fully the requirements of her time. And she had been able to become a great friend of her famous cousin Mathilda (c. 1031 -1083), the daughter of the Count of Flanders, and now the loving wife of William the Conqueror (c. 1028 - 1087). Normally, she should have educated her son, Philippe I, who was too young the way she had initiated, but under the tutelage of her brother-in-law, the Count Beaudoin V of Flanders (c. 1012 - 1067) precisely, as Regent of France. But, it didn't happen exactly this way.<i> She decided she didn't need any tutelage, as the Queen of France and the mother of the King</i>. She was a reigning Queen under Henri I, and she would stay this way ! </p><p>The People was accustomed to see her really reigning with her husband, and didn't wish this to change as she was an excellent Queen. So sure of the popular support and the one of<i> her personal "Drujina"</i> (personal guard of devoted boyars, which included also quickly French knights ready to die for her), <i>she decided by herself she would be the co-Regent of France till the majority of her son Philippe I (1052 - 1108).</i> <i>In that way, she behaved rather in the manner of the Autocrats of Ukraine or Byzantium </i>- her great-grand-father was Emperor of Byzantium, under the name of Roman II. As an aside, this last genealogical detail is explaining why Pierre II de Courtenay (c. 1165 - 1219), grandson of Louis VI the Fat (1081 - 1137), himself grandson of Ann of Kiev, could be crowned Emperor of Constantinople (Byzantium) on April 9th, 1217 !</p><p>Coming back to Queen Ann, it was therefore not advisable to oppose her because of her followers, and no one dared to do it. So the other "co-Regent", the Count Baudoin V of Flanders, uncle of Philippe I, couldn't do much in fact. He couldn't even prevent her to remarry in 1063 with the man of her choice, Raoul de Crépy, Count of Valois (c. 1020 - 1074), who she found manly enough to fill the affective void of her life ! This remarriage nevertheless caused her problems, as the new couple was excommunicated the year after. As a matter of fact, Raoul of Valois had to repudiate his second wife Alienor to marry Ann. But Ann was an Orthodox depending on the patriarchate of Constantinople and not anymore of Roma, since the Great Schism of 1054. Normally as a Queen, she was expected to remain widow till the end of her days. But, among all the Queens of France, Queen Ann was unique. And she did totally differently by following her good star, and by forging her exceptional and imperious destiny !</p><p>Queen Ann left Paris she found noisy and dirty, and the Parisians sometimes punished for their insolence. She always preferred Senlis where she had often stayed. And she established also nearby in Crépy-en-Valois (presently in the department of Oise too). Over there, she created a kind of court around her. And before they arrived in Paris, the foreign sovereigns made a detour of respect through her home. William the Conqueror, the new King of England descending from Prince Rollo or Hrolfr (c. 846 - c. 932) that she appreciated a lot, and whose wife Mathilda - who made the famous "Tapestry of Bayeux" - was her best friend, visited her. Both of them were from Viking origin. It is also said that the first trouveres started in her castles to paint and chant her striking beauty.<i> She was worshipped as "the Lady" by excellence. Then she was an inspirer for the first Court of Courtly Love in France and Europe,</i> before trouveres with the language of Oïl (and troubadours with the language of Oc in the South) expanded throughout the Kingdom of France...and in Europe ! </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>To conclude, it has to be stressed that after the death of her second husband, Queen Ann felt terribly alone. Her son Philippe I had already attained majority since several years. And she wasn't anymore co-Regent of France. She thought she wasn't needed anymore. Then, it was time to think anew about her future life !</p><p>She had a terrible nostalgia of the Rus' of Kiev, and she wanted to come back to her homeland before dying. That's why she desired to return to Novgorod that she had left a long time ago for her marriage with the King of France, Henri I. And it's what she finally did with the permission of her son, the new King Philippe I. It was a long and tiring journey from Rouen and the mouth of the Seine River. She had to navigate in the Channel in direction of Riga (Baltic Sea) first. And the rest of the travel was made essentially by boat too by using the various rivers of her homeland, till Novgorod !</p><p>The happiness of returning to her homeland was there, despite her very poor health. She is said to have died when arriving by boat in Novgorod, like a Viking Varangian Princess (what she was effectively by ancestry and her family connection with Sweden notably). Her life had been full and adventurous. Unhappily, death prevented her to go back to Kiev thereafter, as she had planned. All the historians don't agree on the year of her death. But nowadays, she is thought to have died most likely around September 1089 (perhaps on the 5th) !</p><p>The strong mark of Ann of Kiev or Russia concerning the Sovereign's authority abruptly ceased seven hundred years after her death, in 1789. At that time, the authority of the King of France over suddenly weakened after the difficult beginnings of the Estates General in Versailles from May 5th ; and it was never recovered by King Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?). Another borrowed sovereignty appeared, the one of the People as our books of history are teaching us !</p><p>So the new France initiated at that time was very different. It's recalled almost everyday on TV or elsewhere, when so many people often omit its very name. It's just called for convenience "The Republic", as if there was only one in the world. Yet in truth, America with its own declaration of rights was a republic before France (1776). In fact, nowadays there are 152 republics of various types (democracies of course, but also democratorships, and dictatorships) registered in the UNO, but only one France as a Western democracy officially. And Ann of Kiev or Russia about her always called her new country, after her marriage with Henri I from its real name, France !</p><p>Of course, without us being aware, a return to the original meaning of "Res Publica" ("the public thing" or more simply "The State"), the transitional way it was applied to France under the last King Valois, Henri III (1551 - 1589), and under the new King Bourbon, Henri IV (1553 - 1610) by the jurisconsult Jean Bodin (1529 or 1530 - 1596), might have been subtly operated !</p><p>Anyhow, nowadays it's no longer a great secret for many that present France is in reality anew a Monarchy since the Constitution of October 4th, 1958 - but an hybrid one as Republican Monarchy. It was the will of General Charles de Gaulle (1890 - 1970), in order to reconciliate French people with the rich, glorious, and powerful past of Eternal France. Don't forget the preparatory works about this new constitution were untitled in French "Du Principat" ("Of the Principate") : to be precise, it just meant that the President of the new French Republic had to be considered as a kind of elected Prince...a bit like Hugues Capet in 987 in Senlis !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-54756371789817372182023-10-07T07:16:00.002-07:002023-10-20T07:54:41.162-07:00Rediscovering famous characters XI : the best kept secret of one of the last Priestesses of Artemis, M !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>The character we are going to talk about is very famous worlwide. But you totally ignore she was a Priestess of Artemis, one of the last, at a moment a new religion was going to appear. Her role in this new religion, which is also universally known was determining. She was a rich woman, even she was seen by some people as an hairdresser and a perfumer : she would even be at some extend the most famous Earth ever had, with her worshipped mother-in-law carrying the same first name. We guess you don't understand at all whom we are speaking about !</p><p>She was from Phenician-Syriac origin, and most likely a Princess due to her rank of Priestess of the Goddess Artemis in the Near East. Does this help you ? Probably not ! The new religion she was going to give birth with an extremely famous character, equally from a renowned Royal House, was then hybrid. Of course, few scholars know or acknowledge such a detail. And paradoxically, the people who know the less who she was exactly are the present followers of this new world religion !</p><p>The name of her husband was starting with a Y (or a J), depending on the language you are using. He himself was a hidden Prince. Some people call him the Prince of Orion, to show his father was in the Skies. Is it clearer for you ? Not yet, we think ! Her husband and her had a different religion. And this also is totally ignored by most people nowadays. In their mind, she had obviously the same religion of origin as her husband when they met... especially when you consider it a very long time after, like now !</p><p>This question is very important to understand, as till nowadays her name has been associated with a certain confusion on her real status and identity : <i>perhaps the composite being created from three different women, was intended not to openly say she was a sacred Priestess of the Artemis cult initially ? </i>It has been pretended during a long time she wasn't married with her man, which is not true. And in her case, marriage is strangely taken wrongly : it would be allowed for almost everybody, but not for her and her quite famous husband !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>To conclude about our exceptional character of the day, something must be added : in her case and the one of her husband, it has dogmatically been decided by Paulinist opponents that their couple shouldn't be recognized and accepted by all. <i><u>This may even look ridiculous when you read carefully the very canonic Gospel according to Saint John, which is saying Jesus was married and called the "husband" by his cousin Saint John the Baptist </u>: "the one who belongs the bride is the husband ; but the husband's friend stands near him and listens to him" (Saint John, III-29). This detail seems to be an allusion to the sacrament of the nuptial room, which is giving back its primary harmony to the Cosmos, Jesus being considered as the Prince of Orion !</i></p><p>As a lot of people believe in Maria-Magdalena and Jesus, it doesn't appear fair to have denied dogmatically to them the natural and historical right of marriage. And the two children they had (Sarah and Yeshuah) can hardly be considered to have never existed. About that, there is a long tradition making the Merovingian dynasty which once reigned on France, as descending from Jesus Christ and Maria-Magdalena ! The "Sang Real" (Royal Blood) of the original Priory of Sion - dating from 1116 - would have become the "Saint Graal" (Holy Grail) in French !</p><p>At this stage, you most likely started to guess whom we are talking about ? And you may be right. A strange destiny made her becoming friend with two other famous characters connected to the public death of her husband. If we give you their names, you will understand with certitude whom we are speaking. Those names are Pontius Pilatus, Prefect of Judea, and his wife, the Roman Princess Claudia Procula : see our article untitled "Rediscovering famous characters VII : Maria and Claudia, or the happy end of a marital drama !", published on Global Politics and Economics on September 18th, 2019 !</p><p>So now, you have progressively discovered with a certain amazement that our character of the day is Maria Magdalena (Maria of Magdala) ! Without her, there would have been any recognized divinity for Jesus Christ, as it's her who saw him first after his resurrection. And everybody knows that resurrection is impossible for a human being. Without her, no Universal ("Catholic") Religion either so, even her true role and origin are always hidden without the great respect she is deserving with her husband !</p><p>Don't forget the idea of Jesus being the son of God is not coming from his male disciples at all, but from Maria Magdalena...and Jesus himself ! When he was a teenager, his legal father, Joseph, scolded him because he was playing on a saturday, and Jesus took him back by saying : how dare you speak so to the Son of God ! Anyhow, the fact remains that M (Maria-Magdalena) and J (Jesus) are beloved and worshipped in the whole world, in spite of all obstacles since a bit more than two thousand years...with another Maria, Maria the Virgin, mother of Jesus-Christ ! And about Saint John who is said to have written the Gospel carrying his name, he musn't be confused with Saint John of Patmos who wrote the Apocalypse dedicated to the tribulations of present times with the final Armageddon (for the battle of Meggido in Israel) !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-39863583785835812782023-09-09T04:28:00.013-07:002023-10-03T22:17:04.043-07:00Uchronic history XXI : an alternative and anecdotal reading of the French Revolution !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>In this new article of "Uchronic history", we are going to make notably some historical parallels and flashbacks between the France of Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), the one of his far ancestor Louis VI (1081 - 1137), and ours, without forgetting the reference to the "Grand Siècle" of Louis XIV (1638 - 1715) !</p><p>We are going to make connections you probably never make between certain characters and events. And they could be different from what you thought !</p><p>Our present period is cruelly lacking of boldness and panache. So you might be astonished by what you are going to discover...or rediscover with a refreshed vision !</p><p> *****</p><p>Since 1793, France has never been able to recover the past glory of the "Grand Siècle". And it has lost an enormous part of its power and possessions all over the world, which will never be recovered. When France was considered as the First power of Europe, if not in the world at the time of Louis XIV (1638 - 1715), nobody knows exactly if it's still the 7th Power presently. <i>At that time, the Kingdom of France and Navarra was quite an impressive Geopolitical Power extending to Great Louisiana, Canada, India, and Western Africa notably : it was welcome, and not the opposite.</i> Compared to Louis XIV's time, our country is the shadow of itself : <i>for instance at his epoch, "Shrinkflation" couldn't have been possible because of the punishment of the pillory ! </i>Present times are insecure, and it's even dangerous to go to school now. Of course, it's not yet as dangerous as in 1793, but the political intolerance or even the ordinary intolerance of everyday life are not at all a good omen ! The present attempt of rehabilitation of Maximilien de Robespierre by some people is the renewed mark of this deception. How a mass murderer who has inspired the worst totalitarisms in the world could he be a hero of freedom ? How could he be a hope for the People, for more equity and solidarity ? It is impossible to pretend really defending human rights and supporting at the same time the memory of Robespierre (1758 - 1794). France is fed up with incoherent and selfish people who make it suffer, in their desperate search of a dictatorial power without side. Let's add that Robespierre himself was completely incoherent and inconsistent : wasn't he defending the abolition of death penalty as a deputy in 1789 ? Again, he proclaimed to fight against slavery, but when he had the opportunity to take profit of the Declaration of Rights of Woman and the Citizen in 1791 including its abolition, from Olympe de Gouges (1748 - 1793), he rejected it with disdain. As it had been approved by King Louis XVI and Queen Marie-Antoinette, he most likely didn't want them to be anew popular !</p><p><i>The time of Louis XVI, just before the Revolution is marked unspokenly by the Tax reform of the Twentieth (an income and asset tax of 5%, whatever the Order considered), which wasn't restored quickly enough by the King.</i> The idea was to enforce anew this tax created under Louis XV the Beloved (1710 - 1774) in 1749, which had been suppressed in 1763. <i>It was a good reform, everybody becoming again equal towards tax, and the rich paying more than the poor. It was slowly readopted in 1787 with the suppression of all exemptions, but too late to save the Royal Treasury.</i> His ancestor, Louis VI who was able to emprison a bishop in Lille for not paying his due and other issues until the latter asked for pardon, wouldn't have hesitated about him : he would certainly have passed his Tax reform the "Kievan way" without waiting. With him, everybody would have paid his due, and the Revolution would have never occurred ! It's true at the beginning the French Revolution was bearing hope and enthusiam for many people. Because there were indeed abuses, not From the King, but from the high nobility, the high clergy...and the high bourgeoisie as well. Those ones were coming in reality from the three orders, the Third Estate included concerning the high bourgeoisie. For the latter, this aspect of things is always neglected. Just as a reminder, the bourgeoisie highly developped in France under the two reigns of Louis VI the Fat or the Vigilante : as an associate King (rex designatus) during the reign of his father, Philippe I (1052 - 1108), who had been excommunicated several times by the Pope, and while his personal reign (1108 - 1137). Philippe I had been named this original way for the time, by his mother Queen Ann of Kiev (between 1024 and 1036 in Kiev - most likely 1089 in Novgorod), in honor of her ancestor Philippe II of Macedon (381 BC - 336 BC), father of Alexander the Great (356 BC - 323 BC). As a matter of fact, Ann of Kiev had become the wife of Henri I of France (1008 - 1060) !</p><p><br /></p><p>Historically, the creation of "Bourgs", and then bourgeoisie, was encouraged in the Kingdom of France on the basis of the Kievan model, id est <i>with the incredible development of Communalism. </i>The new towns ("Novgorod" in Ukrainian and in Russian) were flourishing. Bourgeois were administered by themselves and didn't depend on their proximate landlord, but directly on the King. And it was the same for the Royal serfs who were benefitting of the free schools created by Queen Ann of Kiev in Paris area - as for her mujiks : they were semi-free, had rights and could even become Mayor... or Prime Minister like the childhood friend of the King, the Abbot of Saint Denis, Suger (1081 - 1151). Louis VI always chose competent people to administer the Kingdom. And if France has still got a bit more than 35 000 communes now, it's just because Louis VI was the proud grandson of the beautiful and energetic Ann of Kiev. As an aside, Louis VI was admiring a lot his grandmother.<i> One day, he even found a plan of attack of castle she had drawn in her missal. He used it to change his methods of attack with sappers (from the bottom then, like her), and since that he was always victorious over the lords brigands of Paris area or elsewhere ! The renovated era initiated by Louis VI, </i>that should rather have been called the Tall (1,86 m, just like Louis XVI), was marked by the triumph of the Gothic, in a pacified Kingdom, more rich and prosperous than ever ! Louis VI is the first King who untitled himself "Roi de la France et non plus des Francs" ("King of France and no longer of the Franks"), by creating this way "la Nation Françoise". Again, it's him who made Paris the definitive capital of France !</p><p>Let's step now to the time of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen of August 26th, 1789 : it is appearing well behind the American one (July 4th, 1776) ! The latter is considering freedom as a natural and imprescriptible right, when the other is not even mentioning it. It is more a reminder of already roughly existing rights for most of them. So even its article 1 proclaiming freedom and equality for all men, but not women, is stressing after the semicolon that <i>"differences can be only founded on common utility." </i>After all, one of his main conceptors, Armand de Vignerot du Plessis-Richelieu (1761 - 1800), was remembering he was Duke of Aiguillon, and not a commoner ! Let's add that when he abolished the privileges during the night of August 4th, 1789, the same Duke did it under the condition that peasants would buy back their freedom and feudal rights to their lords : this astute trick - to help them paying back their gambling heavy debts in particular unspokenly - lasted till 1793, and it is remaining ignored from most citizens nowadays ! Above that, there is not either any right to happiness in the Declaration of Rights of 1789, which would imply it was unattainable in the new France anyway. And those now written rights (by substitution to customary rights) were going very quickly to be violated and trampled by the Revolutionaries, one after the other. They became completely theoretical and then fictive. Moreover, Revolutionaries almost immediately stole from the People its newly acquired sovereignty (coming from the King'one) without any state of mind, for their personal interests as the new ruling class !</p><p><br /></p><p>France is desperately looking for its saviour, but he may never come. There is not anymore any Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) nowadays. No one can fool anymore the root Destroyers, like he may have done it in fact with doubles of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette (1755 - 1793 or 1834 ?) !<i> He operated in both cases with a "double trigger system" : first, to save himself the Royal person with a double, and second, to save the double (doppelganger) with comparses.</i> Thus, on January 21st, 1793 in the morning, there were not one but two rescue operations : the first along 52 rue Beauregard (Bonne Nouvelle district) for the King, and then the second a little before the sedan had arrived at the Place de la Révolution (Place de la Concorde now) for the Belgian monk, when passing beside the Madeleine Church, still in Paris. And for the Queen, the saving happened on the night of August 30th, 1793 at the way out of the Conciergerie Jail in Paris. It was followed by the attempt of saving of her double, Cornélia de Galéan, by the Knight of Rougeville (renamed "de Maison Rouge" by Alexandre Dumas at his demand), on the night of 2 to 3 september 1793 ("Carnation Conspiracy"). In both cases, it was the second operation which failed :<i> so no double could possibly be saved !</i></p><p><i>Jean de Batz was making Robespierre terribly nervous. For instance, it took almost three months for the Revolutionaries to establish the certificate of decease of the King (March 18th, 1793, at last), because there was a concealed doubt on the identity of the man really executed on January 21st, 1793. </i>Practically as well as medically, his body which had been thrown to the mass grave couldn't be identified with an absolute certitude. <i>So it was decided he was dead "ideologically and symbolically", at least. Robespierre could never catch the Baron saviour, who was behaving as a character of theater. Everytime, he was able to narrowly escape by disguising himself. He was too cunning for him. T</i>hat's why Robespierre attacked his weak point, his beloved girlfriend, Marie-Madeleine de Grandmaison (1761 - 1794), a singer and actress in the Italian Comedy of Paris. As she refused to talk and say where was hiding "Jean", her beloved boyfriend, he ordered cruelly to deprive her of food till her execution - after a certain time. She was finally guillotined with more than fifty other poor victims (in "Red Shirts" to mark infamy), on June 17th, 1794. <i>The Baron who attended the scene in the Parisian distri</i>ct <i>of</i> <i>Picpus</i> <i>was terribly moved,</i> and he could hardly retain his tears and anger, as he was madly in love with her, and wanted to marry her. Yet, when he was unecessarily shot in the jaw by the gendarme Merda (1773 - 1812), Maximilien de Robespierre suddenly realized that he himself was now deprived of any possibility of eating. And he intimately knew from whom it was coming ! It took only fourty days for the Baron Jean de Batz to provoke with others the fall of the bloody Robespierre, on Thermidor 9th, Year II (July 27th, 1794), and <i>to render his "high" justice.</i> Robespierre was guillotined the day after, with Jacobine comparses, and "Marie" was revenged in front of History, like many others !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>We will conclude unexpectedly with the Letter to the French people of June 20th, 1786 from the Count Alexandre de Cagliostro refuged in England after the famous "Queen's necklace case" : "s<i>omeone asked me if I would return to France, in the event that the defenses which prevent me to do so would be lifted. Certainly, I replied, provided that La Bastille became a public promenade...It is worthy of your parliaments to work for this happy revolution. Yes my friend, I announce it, there will reign over you a prince who will put his glory to the abolition of the letters of cachet, to the convocation of your Estates general, and especially to the restoration of the true religion." </i></p><p>Strangely, as Great Master (or "Great Cophte") of the Egyptian Freemasonry he created around 1780 - with mixity, for the first time -, he is clearly appearing as a definitive Monarchist, on the British model ! His reference to La Bastille is connected to the fact he stayed over there for a while in 1785 and early 1786, like his pupil in Alchemy, the Cardinal Louis-René de Rohan (1734- 1803) : they were involved in the famous "Queen's necklace case" ! <i>Nowadays, La Bastille has really become a public promenade.</i> <i>And paradoxically, the Prince who convocated the Estates General for May 5th, 1789, and wanted to restore the true religion with religious people really devoted to God was...Louis XVI. </i>The Cardinal of Rohan, also Bishop of Strasbourg and great Chaplain of France, in that acception wasn't a really religious man : he was a womanizer, and the King knew he was already trying to push himself with his wife, Marie-Antoinette, when she was a young Archduchess in Vienna. And the fact he was done by a first double of the Queen, named Oliva (Nicole in fact), in the "Queen's necklace case", was just showing he was quite an insisting man ! </p><p>Let's recall that the Great Cophte Cagliostro (from his real name Joseph Balsamo or Baume in French, 1743 - 1795) had been a disappointed seminarian in Italy... where he finally died after multiples peregrinations. He recklessly came back to his country with his wife, but he was arrested by the Pontifical authorities in 1789 under the accusation of practicing Freemasonry. Firstly emprisoned in Roma (Castel San Angelo), he ended up walled up alive in his new cell in the Fortress of San Leo (Central Italy)... like the real false Louis XVII was in the Temple Jail of Paris after January 19th, 1794 ! But there is another version of his death : his attachment to a balanced Royalty for France wasn't to everyone liking. And he would have been strangled by a French soldier of the Year III, during the French invasion of the Papal States, on August 26th, 1795. <i>Thus, no Revolutionary freed him !</i> </p><p>Nowadays, a certain number of people would like to restart the fateful year 1793 : they should be careful about their stupid wishes, as they may harm themselves in reality, just like Robespierre the Dictator. <i>He was neither the "New Messaiah" nor the Pope of the Supreme Being. </i>Just pleasing <i>Catherine Théot (1716 - 1794), the weird "Mother of God", </i>appeared hopeless. And he discovered it very quickly after the festivities he had pompously organized on June, 8th 1794, in the Champ de Mars in Paris. The Great Terror initiated in 1793 ended up in Thermidor 1794 by terrorizing the Jacobine Terrorists themselves, who had recklessly supported Robespierre ! Nowadays, the ex-dominant ruling class of 1789 and 1793, and its offsprings are worried about their becoming : a good part of them are paradoxically taking cover or giving the change into movements which seem opposed to their interests of class... or even worse, among black blocks. It's a way to exorcise their fear of downgrading : hence, they think that the Revolution is still theirs, even if they have misplaced it !</p><p><i>The French Revolution has been many times rewritten, to give it a meaning it probably never had. But it's true this helped a lot to build a mythology, yet not totally seducing.</i> And more and more people, especially among the young generation, are thinking : all this bloody mess for that ! Today, the Chouans are respected for their faith, their courage to have resisted to oppression, and their panache. May be is it explaining why people are unconsciously looking for their future...in the past ? When people have to struggle to just live or survive, they think more with their gouts than their brain. They need a not too expensive food or affordable goods (with prices non inflated by profiteers with impunity), a minimum of welfare and respect, and being able to take true holidays. Of course, having a great hope for the future is also very important. So, they don't feel reassured when everything is falling around them. The magic thinking of repeating always the same "words to catch" (catchwords), will never replace the reality of everyday life.<i> Don't forget French people, under the rule of a now almost dominating capitalist ecology, are more than ever afraid that the Sky will fall on their head, like the Gauls !</i></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-21012927284634096662023-08-20T08:47:00.007-07:002023-08-25T04:32:41.101-07:00Just science-fiction LXI : the unspoken and astonishing surprises of the war against CO2 on Earth !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>This new article of "Just science-fiction" is not purely ecologist. It just want to explain some potentially hidden reasons to the World War against CO2 (Carbon Dioxide also called Carbonic Gas). Obviously, it is coming in addition to the issue of the climatic change defined by "Dr Carl Gerstein" in 1957, or more precisely beside it. </p><p>Be prepared to jump from your seat while reading the unexpected revelations of our imaginative mind : it is concerning essentially Zeta Reticulians, also called Small Greys or "J-rods", but not only ! Just coincidentally, Earth would live this year its 47th heat wave period since 1947, according to some journalists. We didn't know this type of climatic event was discreetly counted since 1947 !</p><p>Coming back to the incident of Roswell during the summer 1947, it was only due to the fall of a weather balloon justly, after an hesitation involving two "flying discs" at the beginning. A probe balloon shining like aluminum (Project Mogul) quickly replaced finally the remains of an accident between a Zeta flying disc (also called "flying saucer") and an Andromedan one. It is even still the "official" truth ! Of course, as usually our article doesn't pretend to be the reality, but simply an article of one of our mascot series "Just science-fiction". Then it's time for you to enjoy your reading !</p><p><br /></p><p> ******</p><p>Among ETs present on Earth, at least since July 4th, 1947, after the crash of Roswell (New Mexico, USA), Zeta Reticulians are certainly the most original. Their number also is quite high compared to the presence of other species. Around half of ETs on Earth at least are said to be Small Greys, as they have been nicknamed. They are living predominantly in many underground bases in the USA and elsewhere in the world (Eastern France and Aquitania too ?), so not only in the area 51 - Nevada, USA. They are famous for their abductions of human beings all over the world (Australia and New Zealand included) !</p><p>Physically, Small Greys are not always between 1,08 m and 1,20 m tall : sometimes they can reach 1,50 m or even 1,56 m. Tall Greys are between 1,76 m and 2,45 m usually. Beside their big head and their skinny body, they have got many pecularities. And this is making them different from Earthlings or Pleiadians and Aldebarans for instance. <i>Most specialists think they are insectoids, which may not be so true in reality. As a matter of fact, a rare part of Ufologists and writers of science-fiction like us, consider on the contrary they have more in common with plants. For instance, their blood or sap is greenish </i>like the "Walking Plants" of Mars. And they have an additional organ unknown at the the solar plexus !</p><p>In fact, they might feed their body and regenerate essentially <i>through Photosynthesis (and CO2 then) like vegetals, beside their need of Jelly.</i> However, they can absorb small things too. Don't forget they have no digestive system at the difference of human beings or other ETs : their excretion is through the skin ! <i>And in that way, the World War against CO2 could easily appear as a concealed War against their expansion on Earth, considered as a big threat. </i>And the same could be said about the descendants of Martian survivors, yet in a limited number, who need more CO2 to breathe than human beings. Of course, it was not taken into account that both of them could be more peaceful than many Earthlings in fact !</p><p><br /></p><p>In a way, <i>the fast development of Ecology since 1957, </i>under the impulsion of Laurance Rockfeller (1910 - 2004), could be due to the Extranean concern...or threat. The main point of the Huntsville conference in Alabama (USA) in 1957, might not have been only "<i>the Alternative 3" : the transmigration of an Earthling elite to Mars via a way station on the Moon, in order to abandon a dying Earth ! The renewed interest for the Moon from the USA, China, India, Israel or again Russia, would then follow this rather persevering logic !</i></p><p>Paradoxically, nowadays some so-called debunkers are doubting the existence of "Dr Carl Gerstein", the physicist who had launched this idea in 1957 as the best option for an elite in front of a<i> "catastrophic climate change"</i> (sic) provoked by pollution on Earth, with an excess of CO2 in our atmosphere. Whatever his real name would have been (Richard Marner), it wouldn't be so obvious to believe that presently the "Alternative 3" to establish a huge colony of selected Earthlings on Mars wouldn't exist ! May be, are they also denying the efforts of Elon Musk (born in 1971 in Pretoria, South Africa) to accomplish such challenge with Space X, yet very real ? The habitability of the Earth for humans is seriously questioned in many geographical areas now, anyway !</p><p>Coming back to the Greys, their aptitudes are astonishing in many fields : mining, agriculture, building, technology, data processing, robotics, and sciences or medicine where they can be phenomenal. Another unexpected sector is certainly security, because of the use of their paralyzing telepathic waves. In a perturbated school for instance, they could very quickly bring back calm and order. They can very easily make polite rude people, with their mastery of sound waves : it's better not to annoy them then. And it would be the same among a crowd gone mad !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>In conclusion, since the first US - ET Treaty of 1954 - null and void - with the Greys (Small ones, and also Tall ones or Rigelians about them), but especially after the "Tau IX Treaty" of 1958 ongoing, the number of Zetas on Earth (or underground) has grown a lot... and in parallel the number of Tall Greys, their controllers too ! When fighting, Small Greys can be more aggressive than Tall Greys. So you should never underestimate their hidden strength. And they are renewing their presence, which was already known in disappeared civilizations on Earth like the one of Hawaï, with the "Menehune" !</p><p>But Rigelians (Tall Greys) have sometimes difficulties to make them obedient, especially about distractions and what goes with them. So, it's not surprising it can be still more difficult when the control is coming from human beings (American soldiers for instance). As a matter of fact, they can be very mischievous, especially in case of unfairness toward them or their friends. After their work on flying saucers and other spaceships in the USA, they love to have party with vodka orange, fine cigars and beautiful singers. Their North Korean counterparts, amators of Cognac (the smallest branch of them), like very much exploding missiles in the Sea of Japan for fun, about them !</p><p>The will to limit CO2 on Earth could then be interpreted as a way to limit at the same time their number on Earth, and prevent a too big growth of their population. Of course, a sudden acceleration of the Climatic Change would mean in that case exactly the opposite ! Another concern is the balance between "J-rods" A and B ("J-rods" is the way they are calling themselves) : if the first group is friendly with Earthlings, it's not at all the case of the second group. They dislike human wankers in any field, including delivery. And don't think those two groups are totally separated in everyday life, because it's not as simple, wherever they are !</p><p>If you have seen the American film "Paul" (a Greg Mottola movie from Hollywood in 2011) about a funny Small Grey, you will understand better how clever they are to survive. This is an alternative story to the incident of Roswell (New Mexico), happening the same year (1947) but in Wyoming this time. What is a bit weird is that Paul is presented as an Andromedan, with 4 fingers at each hand (not six), whose excretion would be similar to that of a human being : he likes sweets and cigarettes, and uses a coarse language without telepathy. It's him who would chose the way he wants to talk with you. By comparison, in the case of "Airl", the peaceful Andromedan ambassador who was badly injured on july 4th, 1947, she could not talk and was communicating only by telepathy with her human nurse. And she was more "orange" than grey or dark green, with a size just above 1,60 m. Happily, Paul has got the ability to cure or even resurrect a human being, and to become invisible by being in apnea for a short time. And this at least is making him a real ET ! </p><p>Small Greys are neither basically bad nor good (just as human beings to be honest), but they like a lot fun in life, and gratitude rather than the opposite ! At the difference of real Andromedans, only Zetas have 4 fingers at each hand and not six. And they usually never hesitate to take their chance if it comes to them. Don't forget they are quite intelligent and resourceful ! And the good point yet, is that they can be very loyal and devoted friends, as they are very sensitive to politeness and kindness. Zetas are usually more polite than Paul, and it's not true they don't feel or show any emotion (especially females). Again, strawberry ice creams are welcome !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-13589231236881084722023-07-26T00:05:00.012-07:002023-08-08T12:46:02.403-07:00Just science-fiction LX : the ancient messages of the Fallen Angels of Aldebaran !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>In this new article of Just science-fiction, we will revisit known data about incomprehension. The incomprehension we want to talk about is the one surrounding Aldebaran, this famous star of the Hyades group !</p><p>Even, when Aldebarans are trying to communicate with Earth, Earthlings are refusing to listen...or read. May be is it connected to the fact they were too simplistically stamped as "Fallen Angels" by the Bible, on a very binary and outdated mode ?</p><p>Of course, as usually this masterpiece of imagination, has to be taken as just science-fiction. So read our writing to relax, and have fun !</p><p> ******</p><p>In fact among ETs, Aldebarans are the ones who left writings in old time. But those writings have been misunderstood or not understood at all. Of course, it's true nobody was really able to translate them. What we know about the language of Angels is surrounded with an unecessary mystery, complicating everything. Aldebaran's writing seems to be an artificial language, a kind of Cosmic "Esperanto". That's why you can find words from various Earthling languages too : hebrew, czech, german, latin and other languages are melted. To be able to understand Aldebaran people is certainly easier for a creative mind who has no intellectual barriers, than for someone who has been completely formated ! The other reason is connected to the fact Aldebarans gave support to Martians, during and after their War with Pleiadians (their ex-brothers, also called "Angels" by the Bible). In that way, they have till recently been considered as renegades, even they acted this way for humanitarian concerns. As rescued Martians were brought on the dark side on the Moon and on Earth (Antarctica), Aldebarans were symbolically called "Fallen Angels" : it was like if they fell from Mars, at the same time as they had fallen from their rank in the Pleiadian Federation for this help, in opposition with the Pleiadian "Pharaoh" !</p><p>The most handicaped people to learn something from Aldebaran are probably Cartesians. Of course, it's not their fault, but the one of their limited internal programmation. Their strict use of bicameral spirit connected to the way our brain is made, prevent them to understand anything. In a way, our world is dying presently because of their over-exaggerated importance in everyday life. And often they are at the opposite of what really thought René Descartes ( 1596 - 1650) about life in the Cosmos. Like Giordano Bruno (1548 - 1600) with his "plurality of inhabited worlds", he thought life existed elsewhere than Earth. His "Discours de la méthode" ("Discourse of the method") was only aiming at getting rid thinking from the religious gangue which was preventing it to be free. Bruno was about him a dominican brother... and a magician born in Nola beside Napoli (Italy). And he had before him a similar aim. It is said he was burnt alive in 1600, because he had claimed that Earth was revolving around the Sun - and not the opposite. But, this was finally a very secondary point among all the works he had written !</p><p>As a lot of astronomers of his time and even before, Bruno had been interested in Aldebaran. He had spent some time in England (London and Oxford) in 1583. And nobody can ascertain he never met John Dee (1527 - 1608 or 1609) over there... especially if he did ! As a matter of fact, John Dee was equally a famous magician, as well as a geographer and the personal astrologer and occult advisor of Queen Elizabeth I (1533 - 1603), the "Virgin Queen". And he is said to have set for her the basis of the "British Empire" - following the expression he had created -, and its domination over the Seas with the help of Angels (the Aldebarans). In fact, he had entered in possession of a mysterious Manuscript on parchment referring to Aldebaran and Mars, given by the Duke of Northumberland. Some specialists thought it had been written by Roger Bacon (c. 1220 - c. 1292), the famous English philosopher, scientist and alchemist, but it doesn't seem to be so in reality. But it is putting in question the datation of the Manuscript (officially from the XVth century). John Dee didn't think at all that it was coming from a human writer, but from the Angel Anael he communicated with on a friday. That's why he dedicated his tumultuous life to develop a deep knowledge of the Angels' language, in order to understand clearly their teachings and their messages ! </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>This Aldebaran Manuscript is, between other things, giving the description of a lot of funny plants of Mars before it was destroyed by the nuclear bombings of Pleiadians, </i>and among them strange "marching" plants. Nobody knows if such plants were transported on Earth with the mission of rescue of Aldebaran to help Martian survivors : the latters took refuge on our planet in addition to the dark side of the Moon a very long time ago. <i>Nowadays this writing is called the "Voynich manuscript" </i>as it went in 1912 under the possession of a Polish collector living in America named Wilfrid Michael Voynich (1865 -1930). The latter just bought it from their last owners, Jesuits of Frascati (Italy). Currently, it is kept in a safe of Yale University (USA). Its format is 15 x 23 cm, and it provides predominantly illustrations in colour which should help its understanding by specialists : only 33 pages contain only text !</p><p>Since that, it has been studied by the best specialists of cryptography in the world, but nobody has been able to break its code.<i> Of course, if it has never been coded, you can easily understand why !</i> Nowadays again, it has yet been written that it has been "decoded", but only the illustrated page 68 which seems to concern Aldebaran system and refer to Mars has roughly been translated. And in addition, 72 words only of the chapter dedicated to Mars Botany have also been, even it looks fantastic ! Now this manuscript has got 234 pages, without counting the 38 pages missing. Since John Dee, some informed and uncomplicated readers have thought it was just written in the Angels' language (called "Enochian" by John Dee) : that's all ! And they could be right, as Aldebarans have long been nicknamed by the Bible "the Fallen Angels". Beside the drawings of the manuscript, this strange writing is also indicating how to communicate directly with Aldebaran and his people, by the way. And the ancestor of toaster, like the one invented by the genious Nikola Tesla (1856 - 1943) for communicating with Mars, is not necessary !</p><p><i>Is the Manuscript Voynich just an account of life in the Cosmos, and especially on Mars before its nuclear disaster, and a warning to Earthlings which was never understood ? And has it been written by a skilled woman scholar of Aldebaran, owing to the reference to "the man of the house and <u>me</u>" - <u>the writer</u> - of page 68 : Hagiel, also called Anael, a "female Angel" for Earthlings ? </i>This ancient Manuscript is not a simple work of Astronomy, Botany, or Medicine, written in a undecipherable language for abstruse reasons. Of course, to be able to understand something, you need to be in a similar situation. So the time was certainly not fit before ! Now, what is absolutely amazing is that a potentially catastrophic War for the whole world (the War of Ukraine), has been able to provoke after so long a sudden awareness between the so-called "Fallen Angels" (Aldebarans) and the other Angels (Pleiadians) ! </p><p><i>So talking about this binary opposition of the past is outdated, especially if they both agree to rebecome brothers...and sisters too ! </i>When watching human beings suicidally battling against each other for nuts or even peanuts - by refusing any future in common -, they are happening to realize that Aldebarans and Pleiadians have finally so much to share. It seems the time for Redemption has finally come ! And they can rebuild completely their past civilization right now, with green oceans, by following the dream of Celaeno, another important star of the Pleiads with Alcyone. Theirs at least, is certain to remain and revive. And them, they don't try to go fast to get anywhere.<i> "Micaolz olprt" (Shall the powerful light be with you !"), would have said the Archangel Uriel to John Dee !</i></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-59821698966296495002023-06-14T12:15:00.009-07:002023-06-26T02:07:44.350-07:00Just science-fiction LIX : the strange meaning of the word "Pharaoh", in front of "the mirror of the Pleiads and Aldebaran" !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>This new article of one of our mascot series, "Just science-fiction", is in a way dedicated to Im-Ho-Râ, one of the greatest magicians of Old Egypt (Middle Kingdom). We found very interesting elements about him, and even made a dream about him. Im-Ho-Râ as his name is indicating was a magician of God Râ, the Supreme God of the Egyptian pantheon since Pharaoh Kheops (c. 2620 BC - c. 2580 BC). At the difference of many, he wasn't specifically modest. He even wrote his own eulogy (Scripture on a stela from the Temple of Karnak), which is now preserved at the Louvre Museum in Paris (France) ! </p><p>He was certainly content of himself and the knowledge which he had been transmitted by the priests...and from the Stars (like the Pleiads in the constellation of Taurus with Aldebaran). In a way, his attitude is resembling that of Zarathustra, the famous Persian prophet of another religion of the Antiquity, Mazdeism - with its winged alien God Ahura-Mazda. His way to express was in fact more the sign of a great enthusiasm (with the original meaning of being possessed by a God), than really immodesty ! In the Temple of Karnak, he liked to talk with the "Marching Statue" of the alien God Râ about the deep meaning of "Pharaoh", which was connected to the Cosmos for him !</p><p><i>A "Pharaoh" was far more than an ordinary King : actually, it didn't even mean "King"</i> <i>etymologically,</i> which is the biggest surprise of its attempt of translation. <i>This notion was only suggested from an inductive angle by its sense of "Great House". </i>And that's what we are going to show with "the mirror of the Pleiads and Aldebaran", with always current implications. Of course, as usually you just have to take our narration as a masterpiece of imagination and induction, id est "Just science-fiction". So sit down comfortably and just enjoy your reading ! </p><p> *******</p><p> </p><p><i>A Pharaoh was certainly a King, an holy King. And a lot of people think that this word is the Egyptian translation of "King". But it is not at all the case in reality. </i>"Pharaoh" is coming from the Egyptian "Per' Aa", and it means precisely "Great House" ("Grande Maison" in French), which is far different from "King". How to explain this anomaly ? "Pharaoh" is a word indicating the origin and the end of all things for human beings. It is connected to the vast universe, and more accurately to the Cosmos. It is recalling that the first Pharaohs were not from Earth. Actually they seemed to come from the famous Pleiads (or "Atlantides"), a group of stars so important in the far Antiquity.</p><p><i>And this title of "Pharaoh" was the one of the King of the Pleiadian Federation, at the time Aldebaran was still a member. It meant "Great House", </i>as this Federation was composed of several different people making a whole : Aldebaran, Alcyone and others in the Constellation of Taurus. In the Greek mythology, they were the seven sisters, daughters of Atlas the Titan, and Pleione, the Oceanid : Maïa, Alcyone, Asterope, Celeno, Electre, Taygete, and Merope. At this point, we have to be precise, because <i>nowadays the Pleiadian Federation is centered around Alcyone, Aldebaran having left a very long time ago after the nuclear bombing of Mars :</i> it strongly disagreed with the "Pharaoh" of Pleiadians, for humanitarian reasons. The luminosity of Alcyone is equivalent to 800 Suns ! </p><p><i>So then, the War of Mars has introduced a great Chaos in the Universe with its refugees brought by Aldebarans on the hidden face of the Moon...and on Earth (Antarctica, at a time the climate was temperate over there).</i> That's why nowadays some writers of science-fiction can talk of the "Black Fleet" from Antarctica. It repelled with success the US fleet of Admiral Byrd (1888 - 1957) in 1946-47, with its very fast flying saucers. The US "Highjump Operation" totally failed due to the superiority and the precision of those Space vessels : the "Fallen Angels", as they were nicknamed in the Bible, won ! As an astronomic aside, <i>Aldebaran (the ex-"Follower" of the Pleiades, or Alpha Tauri) is situated near the belt of Orion,</i> and its diameter is gigantic (65 times the one of our Sun) as well as its luminosity (150 times the one of the Sun). Its distance from Earth is only 65 light years, which is nothing with the common use of worm holes !</p><p><i>Hence, coming back to the Pharaoh, he should be the obvious and necessary link between the world of men (and women) and the world of Gods, but also and above all between Earth and the Cosmos.</i> "Pleiadians" (the "Navigators" - of Space - in Greek) have got some regrets about this dreamed past, before the Great Division occurred. His duty is to prevent the world from sinking into chaos, violence and desolation. Funnily, nowadays in our so chaotic and incoherent world, we just take this assessment from old Egyptians as a simple metaphor. But it wasn't purely symbolic, and it has never been : for Egyptians, it was a reality. <i>What happened to Mars (recorded by "Al Qahira", "The Camp of Mars" in Egyptian - Cairo nowadays) was still in the memories subconsciously !</i></p><p><i>To summarize, the Pleiadian Sovereign, archetype of the Egyptian Pharaoh, was the one who was uniting nostalgically in his person the whole Pleiads and Aldebaran </i>("le Suiveur" in French) : he was representing in himself the Pleiadian "Great House". So then, the Egyptian title of Pharaoh for the King of Egypt (or more rarely the Queen...with an artificial beard then), was recalling this prestigious origin. He was thus maintaining the link with the "Royal House of the Pleiads". And he was the source of the balance in the whole universe ! As an aside, let's underline that when he changed the Supreme God of Egypt for Râ, instead of Ptah, Pharaoh Keops revolutionalized the Egyptian religion. <i>From Kheops till...nowadays in fact, the Supreme God is still the "alien" God of the Sun, Râ (also called Rê) !</i></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I<i>n conclusion, nowadays the Pleiadians are still recalling from time to time their presence on Earth,</i> to human beings who are awakened. In 2016, They supported the election of Donald Trump (born in 1946 in New-York) to the American presidential elections. Our article published one month before on "Global Politics and Economics" on October 3rd, 2016 ("Just science-fiction XIV : Trump, the Pleiades' option and the message RIVATIVJ !), wanted to illustrate their discrete but powerful presence, when everybody thought Trump would fail in front of Hillary Clinton (born in 1947 in Chicago), the super-favorite of all polls !</p><p><i>The Pleiadians are intervening in human history, if they think a very grave disaster may occur on Earth.</i> And this is particularly true since the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6th and 9th, 1945, by America. Like other ETs (Zetas, Andromedans,Vegans, Arcturians, Aldebarans, Martian survivors or others), they feel very concerned by the use or in fact the misuse of nuclear power by Earthlings. For instance, in August and September 2022, they might have discreetly intervened to neutralize with their advanced technology, the nuclear fuel leaks from the Nuclear Plant of Zaporijjia in Ukraine. So then, the partial destruction of the nearby dam of Kakhovka on the Dniepr, on this month, is a renewed concern for them !</p><p><i>Pleiadians know we are heading inexorably to the Third World War (the "Fourth" for Russia).</i> Even the AI of Google has predicted next November 23rd to be a fateful date. Whether prophetic or not, they might have to intervene to prevent the consequences of a launching of nuclear nukes, missiles or hypersonic torpedoes on Western countries...or from some members of the NATO. Anyway, the seven pyramids of Crimea recalling the Seven Sisters between Sebastopol and the Cape Sarych are Pleiadian (or Aldebaran for their ex-brothers), whatever the status and the nationality of this disputed territory. On the ground, Pleiadians and Aldebarans are very difficult to distinguish physically, if you except their exceptional or "divine" aptitudes : they are tall blond men with blue or green eyes, just like a lot of Slavs ! </p><p><i>Pleiadians know human beings are like children playing unconsciously with fire, as they did themselves a very long time ago. </i>They do not believe at all in their wiseness and their ability to negociate compromises...and certainly not peace : it has to come from outside. They are also aware that their medicine to repair nuclear damages to human or animal bodies, is still in its infancy. Of course, they have realized that human beings know how to use potassium iodide tablets, or more rarely clay and certain minerals to repell or expell radioactivity from the body. But this knowledge is not sufficiently widespread ! Anyhow, it is extremely difficult to guess what the Pleiadian plan is for future Ukraine and Crimea. And the same can be said for their ex-brothers Aldebarans, also involved !</p><p><i>Hence, they don't overstimate the knowledge of human beings about this subject. </i>And they are doubting greatly the level of preparation of some developped countries (France...), in matter of prevention and general information of the public. Just a certain "elite" can be protected in the shelter of the Palais de Chaillot in Paris, or in a few other places, but that's all. <i>Nuclear Asymetrical Deterrence is not all : on Mars for instance, the first strikes have been determining ! </i>If this dogma of Deterrence doesn't work anymore, more people might die of this lack of communication (and existing or not existing anti-atomic shelters...) than just from the direct effects of nuclear weapons themselves. Often, what pisses off Pleiadians and Aldebarans are the blabbering and selfish politicians, who are bluffing with the future of their people and civilization. About that, presently both of them totally agree, at last. And the unexpected and historical effect of the war of Ukraine, could be to reunite and reconciliate - temporarily or not - all the "Angels" of the Bible, for a common cause (the "Great House") !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-59909062990639568792023-05-21T23:50:00.004-07:002023-08-25T04:33:45.635-07:00Uchronic history XX : after the "one hundred days" !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>Today, we are going to talk about the reign of Louis XVIII (1814 - 1815 , 1815 - 1824), under the Restoration in France, and particularly the Second Restoration which succeeded the "one hundred days" of the "Eagle Return", Napoleon I (March 20th, 1815 - June 22th, 1815) !</p><p>Usually, historians are mostly pointing out the first President of the Council of Ministers of Louis XVIII, Armand-Emmanuel du Plessis, Duke of Richelieu (1766 - 1822). Nominated on September 24th, 1815, he certainly helped the country to rise from its ashes : very skilful, he will make pay the war reparations due to the Allies by the big European banks, with the "Richelieu borrowing". However, in agriculture, the main sector of French economy at that time, he didn't do so well !</p><p>Then, we have chosen to highlight the less known, but quite significant role of the last one, Joseph De Villèle (1773 - 1854). De Villèle is the one who was surprisingly victorious of the fearsome Carbonari in France in 1822, for instance. But his specificity was to be victorious on all fronts, by unexpectedly giving back France its grandeur. It is not so far, and yet it is one of the less known and studied period of our history. So get ready for some really unexpected surprises or revelations ! </p><p> ******</p><p>After the "100 days" and the return of Louis XVIII (1755 - 1824) in the beginning of July 1815, there were a certain number of acts of revenge against previous soldiers of the "Great Army" of Napoleon. Between 300 and 500 men found death in the South of France and in the Rhône valley : the assassination of the Marshal Guillaume Brune (1763 - 1815) in Avignon on August 2nd, 1815, who was then thrown in the Rhône river was highly symbolic of this troubled time. <i>This period was called the "White Terror".</i> It provoked the anger of the Duke of Wellington (1769 - 1852), Commander-in-Chief of the Allied forces, and winner of Napoleon I in Waterloo (June 18th, 1815). Wherever the British troops were present in the occupied France (it was occupied by British, Austrian, Russian, and Prussian Allies till november 1818), they stopped them. And Wellington demanded from Louis XVIII himself to give orders to prohibit and prevent this type of actions - which may look rather paradoxical from the main enemy of Napoleon ! </p><p>About that, it has to be added that <i>Arthur Wellesley (the original name of Wellington), </i>had been in his youth Lieutenant Instructor of Infantry in the Military School of Angers (France, 1787). And he had a certain admiration for the greatness of Napoleon I (1769 - 1821) and his valorous troops. He certainly won in Waterloo by using the antic strategy of Alexander the Great (359 BC - 323 BC), that he was taught in France, against Napoleon. Yet, he demonstrated afterwards <i>a kind of brotherhood of arms</i> towards the honorable defeated. And<i> it's him who had equally imposed to the Austrian Chancelor Metternich (1773 - 1859) the non exclusion of France from the Concert of Nations in the Congress of Vienna (1815)...far more than the cunning Talleyrand (1754 - 1838) ! </i>But to the credit of the latter, it was nevertheless him who had introduced Viennese Waltz in France, as soon as January 3rd, 1798, during a party, in his hotel of Faubourg Saint Germain ! As another aside, in 1792 the Empire of Austria had refused to "buy back" the French Royal family emprisoned in the Temple Jail in Paris from Danton (1759 - 1794), the French Minister of Justice - who would have in this proposed process signed his prepared "decree of deportation". And this could have avoided a lot of subsequent problems, even it looked unorthodox ! </p><p>On the other hand, coming back to the "White Terror" - on a legal level this time -, several Napoleon's high officers were judged for high treason towards the King, like Marshal Michel Ney (1769 - 1815) who was sentenced to death by the House of Peers : he was executed on December 7th, 1815. And on January 12th, 1816, a law was passed against previous conventional regicides - like Joseph Fouché (1759 - 1820) also said "the Machine Gun of Lyon", with the punishment of banishment. <i>Yet the Bonapartist question remained dominant during all the reign of Louis XVIII and even after.</i> Bonapartists were the main opponents to the new regime. The remaining Jacobins were not very numerous. And their regime had left very bad memories with the Terror and the genocide of the Vendée...or the horrible forgotten massacre directed against the population of Lyon (badly nicknamed the "Town without name"). Then at that time, they were just associating themselves with the Bonapartist mainstream, by considering Napoleon as the heir of the Revolution - even he had become himself a Monarch ! </p><p><br /></p><p><i>Great Britain had really taken a rather long time after the "official death" of Louis XVII (June 8th., 1795), to accept the Count of Provence on its soil </i>(Gossfield Hall in Essex first in 1807, and then <i>Hartwell house in the Buckinghamshire under the name of "Count of Lille"</i>). He was finally admitted for humanitarian reasons, because he had been expelled from Russia, just after the French-Russian treaty of Tilsit in 1807. And it was the same for his effective recognition as the new King of France, under the name of <i>Louis XVIII : before March 12th, 1814, for instance, Great Britain was still reluctant to accept him to replace Napoleon I.</i> As Great Britain had saved Louis Charles Capet (Louis XVII - 1785-1860 in fact) from the Temple Jail on January, 19th 1794, with the inopinate intervention of the Count of Courtenay and Miss Barett, his assistant from the British Secret Services, she was hesitating in her choice ! </p><p><i>The son of Louis XVI was sheltered in the North-East of England, far enough from the French coasts,</i> as a landlord ("Nay" being "under the shadows", as predicted by Nostradamus in the Quatrain V-41). And he was now just called Charles (or Charlie) by his very pretty English girlfriend. He had found love over there, and he wasn't very keen to come back to France. He didn't wish at that time to be King of this terrible country which had traumatized him as a child, and that he considered as a cutting-throat country where everyone was envying and hating each other. He had just observed in his time, that this society he had thought without faith or law, was periodically shaken under the strange yoyo movement of the antic law of Talion (Old Testament). Nevertheless, with the work of time, his opinion changed a little bit thereafter. But it remains that he was considering France could be an appaling country for any ruler ! </p><p><i>Louis XVIII being laboriously and by default recognized as the successor of his brother Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), things finally went on with the British and the Duke of Wellington</i>. However, the political turmoil happening in France was making the situation difficult. "<i>The unfoundable Chamber" ("la Chambre Introuvable" in French) </i>is the nickname Louis XVIII gave himself to the Chamber of Deputies at the beginning of his reign, when he couldn't find any clear majority in favor of his government. He had granted France a constitutional Chart on June 4th, 1814, which he tried to respect in an unlasting will of appeasement and reconciliation. If it seemed all right at the beginning with a huge majority of Royalists, the number of Ultras appeared quickly too important in front of the Moderates (370 out of 402). And this Chamber wanted to impose its views to the King and his governement, which he didn't like. <i>He finally took the risk to dissolve it on September 5th, 1816...and he won : </i>the new Assembly of Deputies of Departments was far more moderate and easy to handle for him, at last. And the Chart of 1814 could be finally enforced, with the end of the laws of exception !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As an epilogue, it has nevertheless to be noticed that Louis XVIII was never really free in his movements and political choices. As a matter of fact, <i>quickly the past reappeared in his life with the arrival of Zoé de Bashi du Cayla, born Talon (1785 - 1852). </i>She was the daughter of Omer Talon, the previous Civil Lieutenant of Châtelet in Paris, id est the prosecutor of this Court of Justice. It's Talon who had to instruct the complaint of the Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) about the insurrection of October 5th and 6th, 1789. He started well by involving obviously the Duke of Orleans (1747 - 1793), the Marquis of La Fayette (1757 - 1834), Madame Beauprez (in fact Madame Girard), but also the Count of Mirabeau (1749 - 1791) or even Camille Desmoulins (1760 - 1794), the "stuttering Cicero" of the Revolution and the comparse of Philip Equality ! </p><p>But he could never go through, because he was finally pushed to resign for his security, as being involved himself in the tenebrous De Favras case implying the Count of Provence ! <i>To summarize the planned operation of kidnapping of Louis XVI and his family by the Marquis Thomas de Mahy de Favras (1744 - 1790),</i> first lieutenant of the Swiss guards or the Count of Provence in the end of 1789, might have aimed more likeky at killing him "accidentaly" with his son, than sheltering all of them in Lille area. De Favras had the peculiarity to be hanged after his trial in 1790, not guillotined then. About him, it has to be underlined, that Omer Talon had convinced him not to denounce the Count of Provence, brother of the King Louis XVI !</p><p><i>The Love affair between the Countess Zoé du Cayla and Louis XVIII started in 1817</i> after she had come to the Tuileries to ask for his protection, concerning the disputed custody of her children. He fell immediately under her exquisite charm. <i>And he reserved swiftly his wednesdays for Zoé, and had often "peppery evenings" in her company following his own expression ! </i>His health wasn't very good yet as he was fat and had painful feet : he was suffering from gout. However, another explanation, less traditional, given to their link, is connected to a secret letter in her possession coming from her father Omer Talon signed by De Favras, and involving Louis XVIII (as previous Count of Provence) in the De Favras case. Those details are important, because Zoé du Cayla has been seen also as a kind of spy of Louis XVIII's brother, the Count of Artois (1757 - 1836), head of the Ultra-Royalists. And Zoé had a recognized influence on the decisions of Louis XVIII, as his favorite !</p><p>On December 14th, 1821, the year after the assassination by the Bonapartist Louvel (1783 - 1820) of the son of the Count of Artois, the Duke of Berry (February 13th, 1820), <i>Louis XVIII finally chose the leader of the Ultra-Royalist Deputies, Joseph de Villèle</i> from Toulouse, as Minister of Finance. Then, in September 1822 he became his President of the Council of Ministers as the Count De Villèle, while remaining in Finance. Absent from France during the Revolution as he was a marine officer, he had become meanwhile a member of the "Knights of Faith" in 1813, a very influent Royalist secret society created in 1810. For instance, the famous writer and politician, François-René de Chateaubriand (1768 - 1848) was also a member. Founded by Ferdinand de Bertier de Sauvigny (1782 - 1864), this secret society self-dissolved apparently in 1826, after its success in the advent and the establishment of Restoration...or even at his death on September 5th, 1864 !</p><p>This secret Order of Chivalry was directly modelled on Free Masonry, and had five levels (charity associates which gave them an appearance of catholic congregation, squires, knights, knights hospitaller, and knights of faith), plus one : the Superior Council of the Nine, which was counting De Villèle ! Extremely compartmentalized, Board members didn't know each other until a special meeting was held. It is this organization which had welcome the Duke of Wellington in Bordeaux on March 12th, 1814 in the name of Louis XVIII, and had then tipped definitively the scales in favor of Louis XVIII to succeed Napoleon I the following month... rather than the potential and far too young candidate of Austria, Napoleon II (1811 - 1832) ! Coming back to De Villèle, his esoteric knowledge most likely helped him to fight with success the Carbonari (a Revolutionary secret society, from Italian origin), which in France self-dissolved after the failure of the attempt of insurrection of the Four Sergents of La Rochelle in 1822. Very contradictorily, this secret organization which had fought Napoleon in Italy, was welcoming Bonapartist opponents to Louis XVIII in France !</p><p><i>In power, De Villèle, as a top leader of the Ultra-Royalist Deputies, quite paradoxically appeared to be far more moderate than other Ultras when working for Louis XVIII. </i>He was successful in his double position for several years, and the country knew a period of unprecedented prosperity - agriculture included this time. De Villèle used the Deposit and Consignment Fund ("Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations", created in 1816) to finance great industrial projects, such as the renovation of Dunkirk harbour. And the Saving Bank ("Caisse d'Epargne", 1818) was also a very good instrument for his financial policy : still very important nowadays like the previous financial institution mentioned, it was too created under the Restoration for the public good, id est for modest families to help them saving money and increasing their assets. </p><p><i>On a military point of view, France rebecame a great military power after the intervention in Spain he ordered in 1823, to support the Bourbons of Spain.</i> <i>The campaign was rapid (only a few months), efficient, and powerful as he wanted, </i>with the capture of the Trocadero Fort in the harbour of Cadix : <i>two hundred years ago,</i> this great victory was celebrated in France, and gave its name to the "Trocadéro area" in Paris thereafter. <i>France was anew suddenly important in the Concert of Nations, which appeared so amazing at that time ! </i>And it has to be noticed that De Villèle remained with unchanged powers even after the death of Louis XVIII in 1824, under his successor Charles X (previously Count of Artois) till 1828 !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-52387107164976904852023-04-04T02:36:00.002-07:002023-04-06T00:08:08.664-07:00Just science-fiction LVIII : brandishing the Red Strawberry Flag !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>Today, in this new article of "Just science-fiction", we are going to narrate the hot revendications of Zetas (J. Rods A and B) towards Rigelians, Alpha Dracos...and Americans ! </p><p>The Red Strawberry Flag is the one of little Greys, id est a flag with a very red strawberry. And any similarity with existing events would be just coincidental ! Of course, as usually you have to take our narration as Just science-fiction, nothing more !</p><p>So sit down comfortably and enjoy our very unusual story ! In those troubled and tiring times, it's not a bad thing to have fun while discovering alternative ways of life on Earth !</p><p><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> ******</span><br /></p><p><span>Litlle Greys are fed up to work hard under the command of tall Greys (Rigelians), Americans, and their Alpha Draco masters. They are now brandishing their Red Flag (in fact a white Flag with a very big Red Strawberry in the middle). They are demanding compensations in term of less working time, holidays and well being. The Strawberry has been chosen to represent their claims because they do like Strawberries, especially in the form of Ice Creams. As a matter of fact, Jelly is the basis of their food. About retirement age, the question is more complicated than for human beings, as they can live easily over 250 or even 300 years old !</span></p><p>Their masters (Alpha Dracos) and controllers (Rigelians... and Americans) are overwhelmed by the events. J.rods A and B want to have fun in life. They demand a minimum of strawberry ice creams per day, and more festivals or parties with beautiful and sexy human singers, actresses or actors, accompanied with more Vodka Orange... and Cuban cigars ! If their claims are not fulfilled they refuse to go back to work, and they will interfere in world communications ! They even threaten to appear as they are in front of human beings in the streets of cities or in the countryside. Again, the building of new types of Flying Saucers and Spaceships will be delayed. Above that, if they block the basis of Diego Garcia island in the Indian Ocean, any transferance to or from Eve basis on Mars will be problematic !</p><p>Hot negociations are ongoing, and it seems they are now ready to accept too raspberry ice creams, Daïquiri cocktails, and Dominican or Honduran cigars as complementary alternatives. Another point, not so secondary, is the fact they don't like women performers without makeup, not waxed, and with grey colored hair or grey wigs. This new fashion is not at all their cup of tea : this vision makes them very touchy and nervous. It vexes them and gives them bad mood ! Then, they may easily throw tomatoes at them if they are angry : they want to be a respected public. In fact, little Greys appear to be rather conservative in their tastes. What's the point of the Angel Azazel giving makeup to human females, a very long time ago, in that case ! </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Wherever you see a Red Strawberry Flag, you can guess there is protest from the Small Greys ! Delays in the delivery of new Spaceships replacing the now old TR- 3B of the US Solar Warden fleet have got this very original and unexpected root, for example. However, Little Greys are ready to resume work <i>under the "Tau-IX Treaty" of 1958,</i> if their revendications are fulfilled ! And this is true on Roswell basis (noticed for its sudden and improvised parties) as well as on other common basis - usually underground or even intraterrestrial !</p><p><i>"Kissey cheeks"</i> ( the Earthly nickname of J. rods A and B who like to kiss or to be kissed) are demanding and sometimes capricious. Contrarily to what is written by wrong observers,<i> they are not at all robots :</i> they have their own sensitivity, and can be quite demonstrative with their affection ! Of course, they are using themselves the nano technologies they have brought to Earthlings, but they are not more machines than human beings using those technologies. And about their legendary obedience, it is just an urban legend neglecting more prosaic realities : <i>they do like parties, and are clearly joyous revellers !</i></p><p>And the Small Grey females are not left out concerning the male human specimens, when they dance : they clearly prefer handsome and humorous men, exhaling a good smell of musk for instance ! As Zeta females are often Project Managers in total equality with their male counterparts, it is better to take them all on account ! Coming back to perfumes, it must be added that males Zeta have difficulty to bear heady fragrances, which give them a strong headache ! <i>The common mark of female and male J.rods is they do like the "Red-Red" lipstick of a very famous French brand (either to use it or to make it used by pretty human women) !</i></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-36500520319388695862023-03-05T01:20:00.001-08:002023-03-06T13:13:32.647-08:00Uchronic history XIX : breaking news from our special envoy in Versailles, Jean de Batz !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>With high inflation due partly to the War in Ukraine and its consequences on the prices of Energy and Cereals, present time is strangely reconnected to a past concern in France among others : the price of flour and bread, a bit like at the time of the "baker, the female-baker and the little mitron" (Louis XVI, Marie-Antoinette and the Dolphin) in 1789 ! </p><p>The parallel is too striking not to be stressed. That's why today we are going to narrate the events of October 5th and 6th, 1789 in Versailles. And in order to do that, our best reporter is certainly the Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822). At that time, he was a MP in the Constituant National Assembly in the Castle of Versailles, which would make him a perfect special envoy !</p><p> ******</p><p>It's a bit different to what you have learnt at school, if you learnt it. And it's not as simple as bread and Parisian women anger. But it is following accurately the accusations against Philip, Duke of Orleans (1743 - 1793) ), cousin of the King Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), the Marquis de La Fayette (1757 - 1834), and ..."Madame Beauprez", the angry leader of Parisian "women" (not at all an hungry poor Parisian woman in fact) by the same Baron in the Court of Châtelet - Paris - which ensued, with no noticeable follow-up. The retarded involvement of La Fayette as Chief of the National Guard, showed he was behaving as a kind of unofficial "Prime Minister" deciding everything, and not just tempo !</p><p>If the first two characters are very famous, it's extremely rare to find someone having heard of the female-leader's name of angry Parisian "women" against King Louis XVI and Queen Marie-Antoinette (1755 - 1793 or 1834 ?) in Versailles, as mentioned above. In reality, a lot of those "women" were just men dressed in women in fast-moving. It's "Madame Beauprez" who admitted in front of the Baron de Batz, that she had been paid by Philip of Orleans to organize this "carnival" March on Versailles. Actually, he witnessed the two of them talking on the way to Versailles, before her final arrival. Just like he saw equally Philip speaking with Lafayette, to ask him not to intervene immediately on October 5th, 1789 to stop this violent march of heckling on Versailles !</p><p>Without the remarkable courage of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette, a drama could have easily happened to them on that day. And when he decided at last to finally arrive on October 5th, 1789 around midnight, La Fayette told the King he had to follow those "women" to Paris with his family. With his numerous troops, he decided he couldn't do much to maintain order...which wasn't true at all according to Jean de Batz on site. General La Fayette had showed in America that he was able to energically intervene to change an apparently lost situation (Battle of the River Brandywine in Philadelphia area where he was injured - September 11th, 1777), if he wanted to do it ! <i>But he had personal grudges against the Queen, who once laughed at him during a ball as a bad dancer. Above that, she was finding him "moche" in French (ugly in English), which he couldn't stand ! </i></p><p><br /></p><p>Thus, at the issue of those two fateful days, the Royal Family was obliged, more by <i>La Fayette</i> than really by the angry Parisian "Women" led by Madame Beauprez (Madame Girard from her real name, according to the Baron de Batz), to leave Versailles for Paris (Tuileries). <i>It's him who tipped the scales against them : our special envoy insisted on that point.</i> In France, political exaggerated mess is often a sneaky way to hide an inexorable agenda. And it was the real beginning of the end for them. Conforming with the Baron de Batz, the plan of Philip of Orleans (who nicknamed himself "Philip Equality") was initially to make killed by the crowd the Royal Family, as La Fayette didn't come with his troops of the National Guard as soon as he could have done it. But, this at least totally failed, due to the very courageous reactions of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette ! They even recognized the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen of August 26th, 1789 on this occasion, which calmed a bit the crowd totally surprised !</p><p>Madame Beauprez (Girard) wasn't a poor Parisian woman, but a well off "bourgeoise" of Paris in reality. She was even boasting to be rich and well introduced in the circle of the Duke of Orleans. She could pay easily for her bread, and she didn't lack anything in fact ! She was just bought by Philip Equality to organize the March of "Women" for bread on Versailles, with the bloody riot and the massacre of Swiss guards which ensued. It must be added that Philip Equality had diverted a large stock of flour to provoke this artificial crisis against his hated cousin. It was the logic following of the call for Revolution which had started beside his home in Palais Royal on July 12th, 1789, and had preceded the famous Bastille Storming on July 14th, 1789. The Duke of Orleans is the one who had triggered the Revolution from Palais Royal in Paris on the fateful day of July 12th, 1789 under the pretext of the dismissal of Necker (1732 - 1804) by the King. He thought he could use his fellow men like Camille Desmoulins (1760 - 1794) and others, as well as Illuminism to provoke a dynastic change at his profit !</p><p>Philip Equality is the one who had organized the days of October 5th and 6th, 1789, with "Madame Beauprez" to harm the Royal family in Versailles or to bring it back to Paris. He is also the one who had the idea of emprisoning his cousin, Louis XVI and his family in the Temple's dungeon on August 13th, 1792, by using the story of a "Templar revenge" against the Capetians coming from the XIVth century ! But he had forgotten he was himself too a very indirect Capetian, connected to the Iron King, Philip IV the Fair (1268 - 1314). And the "monster" he had-even of many contributed to create just devoured him on November 6th, 1793, when he was himself guillotined. It was just three weeks after the execution of Queen Marie-Antoinette or of her Double, Cornélia de Galéan (October 16th, 1793) ; and it was less than 10 months after the one of King Louis XVI or of his Belgian Double, a Monk (January 21st, 1793), with the strange episodes of the 52 rue Beauregard and of the very proximate 95 rue de Cléry in Paris. <i>In both cases, an overlooked doubt is coming from the Impossible Missions of rescue led by Jean de Batz, the daredevil Baron (Carnation Counter-Operation of the Conciergerie Jail in the night of August 30th, 1793, preceded by the intervention of the Last Chance on the cold morning of January 21st, 1793) ! </i></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Philip-Equality could never take the coveted place of his cousin Louis XVI, never ! And it is absolutely astonishing that until now no cineast in France had made any known movie about the Baron Jean de Batz. His subsequent and successful interactions with the Revolution and its various factions for the actual recognition of basic human rights, were due to t<i>he inner revolt he felt during the days of October 5th and 6th, 1789.</i> He systematically acted thereafter on the same disruptive mode as his enemies (from the shadow). <i>Perhaps an American cineast could make a blockbuster about him, on the "Impossible Mission" mode ? </i></p><p><i>However, more and more people want to know precisely the hidden structure of the Revolution, and why it went so wrong. </i>They feel very confused about this topic they have learnt at school, without really understanding what it changed between the Rich bourgeois and the Poor wretch, or between the Powerful and the Weak. It's even a special concern for the jaded and wary people of suburbs and elsewhere, who dare to demand today its promises to be true and tangible. They do not allow themselves to be told. And yet they are not usually accounted among the "new Chouans" ! </p><p>Of course, they don't realize the Equality promised in 1789 was very quickly set aside by <i>new revolutionary rules of the triumphant bourgeoisie, </i>depriving several million men of the lower people of the right to vote. In a way, it wasn't really contradictive with the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, which was stressing that "Social distinctions can only be founded on common utility" (second part of article 1). And that's probably the reason why people didn't pay enough attention to this legal bias : an astute intellectual pirouette establishing an intermediary system succeeding to the abolished Feudality... returning today in a new form ! </p><p><i>A Censitary Vote for men above 25 was thus established by the Constitution of September 3rd, 1791, between other conditions excluding people in a state of domesticity from citzenship. This was just following the abolition of the ancient pre-revolutionary rights of Strike and Coalition by the "Law Le Chapelier" of June 14th, 1791 ! And concerning the liberated Peasants, it must be added that those ones had to buy back feudal rights to their lords (till 1793) under the Decree of July 3rd, 1790 : the latter was taken in application of the famous and partly misunderstood law of August 4th, 1789, which had abolished those rights under this condition justly. Revolution was founded on the idea of Fundamental Change, even there was from the beginning a confusion between the concept and its actual concretization !</i></p><p>In parallel, millions of women about them wouldn't be recognized any right to vote before the Liberation in 1944, by General de Gaulle (1890 - 1970) as a reward for their engagement and braveness to free France. To fill this legal void, <i>the actress and writer Olympe de Gouges (1748 - 1793) had yet written a Declaration of the Rights of Woman and Citizen (September 14th, 1791), which was addressed to Queen Marie-Antoinette,</i> as the wife of King Louis XVI (the man who had freed her swiftly from La Bastille in 1785, and her truly beloved King).<i> Marie-Antoinette talked a lot about it with her husband, and both of them accepted this unusual Declaration of Rights (also providing for the Freedom of the French colonies' Slaves) with grace. But, it wasn't at all the case of the Jacobins, </i>who sharply rejected it, like Robespierre (1758 - 1794), her deadliest enemy ! And unhappily, in 2014 she was ultimately denied the honour of entering the Pantheon in Paris for unclear reasons, which seemed ideologically keen on her excessive feminine sensitivity towards the King, despite the very long lapse of time !</p><p>Presently, even if People are directly concerned by the complex and tangled pension reform ongoing, they are not aware that the very first special schemes (Marine, Public Works, French Comedy, Opera, Civil Servants, and Army) created between 1673 and 1709 by King Louis XIV (1638 - 1715), should nevertheless be kept ! It would not affect much either the De Castries ordinance signed by King Louis XVI in 1784, instauring the definitive system of invalidity and old age pensions for the merchant marine and sailors in general. And there is a strange historical paradox concerning that, when people usually think they are owing everything to the Great Revolution ! </p><p>In fact, you are obliged to recognize that the act of creation nowadays, for a movie for instance, necessitates a certain amount of boldness and clarity. To be really committed implies a minimum of risk-taking and not to break down already open doors ! It's true it's not easy to keep a free and unformatted mind.<i> It's far easier to be a non-individual by blindly following the collective mind like a mutton...and still miss the chance of your life ! </i>That's why you will count on only one hand the very minute number of people able to do it. Nowadays, you can find easily many people showing off for their selfies or for the planet (as an abstraction submitted to the New dominant Green Capitalism and to the concealed war of hyper-polluting rare-earths), but almost nobody for such audacity. <i>Daredevil is just an almost forgotten hero of Marvel !</i></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-19332432257056310272023-02-09T12:00:00.000-08:002023-02-19T11:48:26.158-08:00Uchronic history XVIII : Cathars were just ordinary Christians according to Atheist historians !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p><br /></p><p>Very recently a new vision of Catharism has spread out. Some Cathar documents would have been found in Northern Italy, which would wholly change the perspective about Catharism.<i> It would make Cathars just ordinary Christians among others</i> for Atheist (or "Scientific") historians. After all, they were just calling themselves "Good Christians" or "Bonshommes et Bonnes femmes", and never "Cathars" which was a nickname given by the Catholic Church. <i>Another nickname was "Patarins", as they were using only "Pater noster" as a prayer.</i> So then, their specificities would be rather gummed... which looks a bit weird in truth ! </p><p>The Cathar Manicheism (a dualism opposing a bad God and a good God, like the famous Zarathustra) would have appeared in reaction, only some time after the crusade of the Papacy (1209- 1229), between 1241 and 1321. And about the link with the Bogomiles ("the friends of God") of Bulgaria, it is now put in question, as well as the "Chart Niquinta" of 1167 which was concluding the coming of Nicetas (also called "Niquinta"), the Orthodox bishop of Constantinople in Saint Félix de Caraman - now denominated Saint Félix de Lauragais. He was there to arbitrate a dispute between the Cathar churches of Toulouse and Carcassonne, and it is very difficult to deny it in reality ! </p><p><i>With those modifications of appreciation, nobody can understand anymore why the Papacy lead the bloody crusade mentioned above against the Albigeois - Cathars - in Languedoc (South of France)</i>, and even after in 1244 in Montségur (Ariège in Occitania, Kingdom of France) thus. Again, why in that case the last "Parfait", the Cathar bishop Guilhem Bélibaste (c. 1280 - 1321) was he burnt alive in Villerouge-Termenès (near Narbonne) in 1321 then, after the treason of his Cathar friend, the cobbler Arnaud Baille or Sicre ? Were really Cathars so "scientifically" ordinary among Christians ? "Theologically" anyway, the answer is no !</p><p><br /></p><p>For Atheist historians, Cathars believed in fact that <i>Jesus had come on Earth</i> not really to save mankind, but<i> to save Fallen Angels lost among bad human beings with their Earthly offspring (for their Redemption then)</i>. It would appear through the new documents found. That's quite an unusual and original point of view ! And<i> this is implying Jesus Christ, Prince of Orion, would have just wanted to bring all the Fallen Angels (symbolized by the number 144) and their offspring back to the real Eden of Cosmos, id est Orion ! </i>But, this new position is entering in contradiction with the sacrament of "<i>Consolamentum" (</i>"Consolation") opened equally to everybody - except if Cathars were considering themselves to be among the 144,000 elect. It was the only sacrament recognized by Cathars (without water and by laying on of hand), and it allowed the soul of all the faithful to attain directly Paradise !</p><p>The strange paradox of the Atheist vision about Cathars, is that it could almost lead to a miraculous reconciliation of Catharism with Catholic religion, and even of Templars with Catholicism in reaction ! It would be a real feat, as those various spiritual groups are fundamentaly considered for centuries as irreconciliable enemies ! Yet, as an aside, there is indeed a rumor of possible recreation of the Templars Order by the Papacy, with all the consequences it would imply for their old possessions scattered in Europe... and more specifically in Eastern Europe !</p><p>But may be those people that Atheist historians are identifying as Cathars from Northern Italy connected to the new documents, who were just ordinary Christians, were not Cathars in reality, but another group of dissidents ? Perhaps are they making a confusion, especially if they were taking in consideration all the Gospels of the Church and not uniquely the Gospel according to Saint John ! Let's recall that Cathars were stressing <i>the predominance of the Gospel according to Saint John, like Templars,</i> <i>even they ended up to be not so friendly to each other : the famous story of the "Patarin" Guilhem or Guillaume de Nogaret </i>(born c. 1260 in Saint Félix de Caraman - died in Paris in 1313) demonstrated it under Philip IV the Fair (1285 - 1314), King of France !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>Was Catharism (born discretely around the year Mil), after all "a simple vegetarian movement of religious protest with spontaneous vocation" ? If it took a rather long time for the</i> Papacy to denounce it as an Heresy in the beginning of XIIIth century, the crusade it finally lead after the failure of various proposals of talks seems to clearly demonstrate the opposite. And if Inquisition was especially created in Toulouse (Kingdom of France) on April 20th, 1233 to combat methodically Catharism, then <i>Cathars can hardly be taken as ordinary Christians among others !</i></p><p>We don't know if by two years now (in 2025 then), <i>the prophecy of the "Perfect" Guilhem Bélibaste, the last Cathar bishop </i>will come true, and thus if Catharism will be brightly reborn in the Kingdom of France (perhaps with the help of Vegans, in the double meaning of the word) ? And it's the same about the still inexistent OTH (Order of the Temple of Hattin) !</p><p>About the final opposition of the famous descendant of Cathar, Guilhem or Guillaume de Nogaret towards Templars, we have given the reasons in a previous article, published on Global Politics and Economics on January 21st, 2016 : <i> "Rediscovering famous characters III : Guilhem, the hidden revanchist Cathar !"</i></p><p>A lot of unforecasted changes are affecting presently the World, so not only Eastern or Western Europe but also the Asia-Pacific area. And the Atheist approach of Catharism is certainly provocative and surprising, but it's not uninteresting. It raises completely unexpected questions, which is perhaps not a bad thing in a time as chaotic as it seemed boring ! </p><p>Usually people think there is an invisible hand guiding those changes, but never a simple Chinese balloon. Yet the changes are possible in most cases, because deep down people are calling for them, without an outside hand. In a way, people create the world which is surrounding them, more powerfully than any invisible hand which cannot always handle everything - especially when things are coming from the world of Fantasy !</p><p>Concerning the civilization of Orion, the authors of science-fiction consider it is mainly populated by Vegans (from Vega) justly, and then Lyrians, Pleiadians, Alpha Dracos and Greys essentially. Just a minority think about Venusians which are influencing Spatial China. The assessments made on Orion are perfectly ambivalent in truth. That's why it is so complicated for a human being, to be able to understand what is exactly representing the world of Orion !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-59381920778985238812023-01-18T23:27:00.001-08:002023-02-02T01:00:02.350-08:00 Just science-fiction LVII : "Planet 9", Aldebaran and Alcyone (from the Pleiades) !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>This new article of Just science-fiction may be intriguing for you, as it is melting "Planet 9", Aldebaran and Alcyone (from the Pleiades) with present events on Earth. Of course, you just have to take it as coming from our rather fertile imagination, as usually,<i> id est</i> Just science-fiction !</p><p> ******</p><p><i>"Planet 9" is one of the most extraordinary anomalies of our Solar System. </i>Until now it wasn't supposed to exist, as Earthling astronomers were supposed to have identified all the planets of Solar System. Normally, our very high tech instruments of observation should have been able to overcome the Sumerian astronomy of the Annunaki, involving the undiscovered planet Nibiru (with its ellipse of 3,600 years). Yet, there is presently an unprecedent competition lead by NASA among Earthling astronomers, whatever they are professionnals or simply amators to discover it...at last !</p><p>"Planet 9" which is less and less an hypothesis, is an aggressive planet : it is even the most aggressive planet of our Solar System. A lot of specialists are considering it could be a kind of "Super Earth"- which shows in the hollow the inefficiency of the best optical instruments of Earth. <i>Its presence in our Solar System is guessed through the strange clustering orbits of Trans-Neptunian objects.</i> It has to be known. And it's not wishable nor advisable to find it. Most likely human beings wouldn't really find it. It could be the opposite : who knows if "Planet 9" wouldn't find (or refind) Earth, may be as soon as this year (2023) ?</p><p>Strange signals have been sent to "Planet 9" in 2022 from the Seven pyramids of Crimea, which is a very disputed land between Russia and Ukraine (which symbol is <i>the trident of Poseidon - or Neptune</i> for the Romans). Those pyramids are recalling the Seven Sisters of the Pleiades from the Constellation of Taurus (even they are actually more numerous). Our article untitled "Just science-fiction LVI : the unveiling of Poseidon's secrets !", published last November on Global Politics and Economics, just pointed out among other things this overlooked peculiarity of Crimea ! As an aside, "Poseidon" is also the name of a strange Russian drone-torpedo, which could be able to provoke a nuclear tsunami on any targeted country !</p><p><br /></p><p>Coming back to the pyramids of Crimea, their control could be far more important than people imagine, not only for Sirians (from Sirius), but also of course <i>for Alcyone or Aldebaran more particularly</i> ! Both ot the latters are among the Seven Sisters, even they represent <i>nowadays two opposite camps :</i> the one of the Pleiadian Federation, and the one of the "Black Fleet" from Antarctica (Territory of Queen Maud). As we explained in the past, Aldebaran left the Pleiadian Federation <i>after the nuclear bombing of Mars ordered by the Pleiadian Sovereign 120,000 years ago,</i> in protest !</p><p>Since 2004, Aldebaran and the Pleiadian Federation are again at war, an unterminable war between ex-brothers, just like Ukraine and Russia on a more Earthling plane. Aldebaran is animating the "Black Fleet" in Antarctica with a Martian core of descendants of survivors, and human beings with a guttural accent. It is the one which was successful in forbiding America to continue Apollo missions on the Moon, in the Seventies. But Alcyone, which has also got its entries in the USA, has been able to provoke a rebalancing of powers in favor of Spatial conquest in direction of the Moon and even Mars, those last years ! </p><p>As a hint of imagination, the date of March 22nd, 2023 seems to be important for the secret War between the "Black Fleet" and the Pleiadian Federation lead by Alcyone, as well as for the open War between Russia and Ukraine with the potentially disruptive use of <i>"scalar weapons".</i> Again a potential surging of "Planet 9" is not to be excluded either on this year. "Planet 9" would have ten times the mass of Earth, and four times its diameter. It would be an icy planet, able to change Earth climates from hot to cold. In fact, nobody knows if the glaciation of Würm period with its three phases (c. 115,000 - c. 11,700 AP) was a collateral consequence of Mars nuclear bombing by Pleiadians, or due to the passage of the "Planet 9" ? But a colder weather would surely please the "Eco-Fearful". The latters who are frightened by a slightly hotter weather, will certainly be content with warm clothing instead ! Brrr! Brrrr !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>In a way "Planet 9" is astonishingly echoing the belief in the 9 worlds of Ancient Vikings. </i>And 2023 could be the year Thor, God of Thunder and Protection, will recover his full powers. As a matter of fact, "Planet 9" seems to be similar to the famous Jotunheim, the icy world of darkness populated by the Ice Giants he was fighting from Asgard (Kingdom of Gods) or even from Midgard (Earth) !</p><p><i>"Eco-Fearful" people</i> who can become too easily "Eco-Demolishers" without any guilt - while being often covered by a shameless virtual impunity -, could see their dream come true. Earth could be no longer hotter, but on the opposite over suddenly colder. It wouldn't be at all connected to their actions "zero carbon", but to the "Planet 9" action, called "zero oxygen". But themselves, if they hardly survive could take profit of the freezing which could ensue, by<i> becoming "Eco-Eskimos" !</i></p><p>Another question is remaining : where the present rupture of the fragile balance of powers between the "Black Fleet" and Alcyone will lead on Earth ? If about Space, we know already that many countries or even private agencies desire to have their share in the envisaged exploitation of the Moon or Mars, this potentially illusory share is more questioned about Eastern Europe without...or with a new iron curtain ! </p><p>As a matter of fact, "Planet 9" is echoing <i>the fateful "Wormwood Star" </i>("l'Etoile Absinthe" in French, and "Tchernobyl" in Ukrainian) of the Apocalypse of Saint John (VIII-11). It would be strangely connected with a sudden raspberry smell in the atmosphere. <i>At a time when statues of Saint Michael (Protector of France) and Maria the Virgin (Protectress of France) can be publicly banned in France for idle reasons recalling the Terror of 1793, Help may no longer come from Heaven !</i></p><p>There were serious warnings of <i>Our Lady of Fatima in 1917 (Portugal)</i> about a Third World War involving Russia, as well as repeatedly renewed tears of <i>Our Lady of Akita</i> on a long period from 1975 to 1981 (not very far from Fukushima, <i>in Japan</i>) concerning the Doomsday. But they haven't really been heard. And many people were just seeing that as a kind of Catholic folklore, without any clear impact on the Earth and its ashes. So then, seeing at last the actual face of Iahve could be a terrific shock !</p><p><br /></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-47397122401950766552022-12-10T04:32:00.003-08:002022-12-12T04:32:26.662-08:00Histoire Uchronique n° XV : "Ranae regem petunt" ou la surprise ratée de Robespierre !<p>par Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Docteur en Géographie Economique, Ph. D</p><p>traduit et adapté de l'anglais par lui-même</p><p>___________________________</p><p>Voici la traduction et l'adaptation en français de notre article intitulé 'Uchronic history XV : "Ranae regem petunt" or the missed surprise of Robespierre !', publié sur Global Politics and Economics le lundi 4 octobre 2021, avant les élections présidentielles de 2022.</p><p> ******</p><p>Il se peut que ce nouvel article d'Histoire Uchronique vous surprenne profondément, avec les détails que nous allons donner, car on ne les a jamais soulignés auparavant.</p><p>Si vous ressentez le besoin de reprendre votre souffle, vous pouvez faire une pause après chaque partie de notre récit.</p><p>Pour l'heure, asseyez-vous bien dans votre siège, et préparez-vous à découvrir les secrets les plus énigmatiques et les plus cachés de l'histoire de France !</p><p><span> </span><span> ******</span></p><p>On peut traduire "Ranae regem petunt" par "Les grenouilles veulent un roi". Cette célèbre citation provient à l'origine de la fable 66 d'Esope. Donc initialement, elle n'a rien à voir avec la France ni le peuple français, qui n'existaient pas encore à son époque. Clovis le Mérovingien (vers 465 - 511) devint Roi des Francs Saliens de Tournai originellement <i>(Belgique Seconde) </i>seulement en 481 ou 482, et <i>son étendard portait des crapauds plutôt que des grenouilles. </i>Il était le fils de Childéric Ier (vers 436 - 481 ou 482), lui-même fils de Mérovée. <i>La singularité de Childéric Ier , le "Roi voyant", venait de ce qu'il avait très probablement pu regagner son trône perdu grâce à l'usage fructueux de sa boule de cristal - retrouvée en 1653 dans sa tombe à Tournai.</i> Quant à Esope (vers 620 av. J.-C. - vers 564 av. J.-C.), il avait vécu au millénaire précédent. C'était un célèbre écrivain grec de fables, natif de Phrygie (en Anatolie). Et il fut en vogue dans tout le monde romain ensuite, ce qui explique pourquoi la fable des grenouilles qui veulent un roi fut reprise par Phèdre (vers 14 av. J.-C. - 50 après J.-C.) sous la présente forme latine... ou encore longtemps après par Jean de la Fontaine (1621 - 1695).</p><p>Pourtant, le souvenir de la Phrygie devint soudainement très important sous la Révolution Française, avec le célèbre Bonnet Phrygien (un bonnet rouge). Il était présenté comme le symbole des esclaves libérés. Or durant le règne des Amazones seulement semi-mythiques, qui dominèrent autrefois l'Anatolie aussi bien que le Sud de la Russie et l'Ukraine jusqu'en 320 avant Jésus-Christ, les esclaves Gagariens mâles - des Scythes - étaient autorisés à porter occasionnellement ce bonnet. Ils arboraient comme elles le bonnet phrygien à l'occasion du "Festival de printemps", la saison spéciale des Amours qui durait deux mois entiers ! Mais habituellement, le sujet du bonnet phrygien révolutionnaire comme symbole hérité de l'Antiquité est présenté sous un jour différent et de manière beaucoup plus vague, et pour le moins tronquée ou édulcorée, il est vrai ! </p><p>Maximilien de Robespierre (1758 -1794), comme les autres révolutionnaires était fortement influencé par l'histoire de l'Antiquité, et faisait souvent des citations de célèbres maximes, comme celle d'Esope à propos des grenouilles : on sait à cet égard qu'il était en contradiction avec lui-même concernant l'idée de république. Le 21 septembre 1792, deux jours après le souper diplomatique de Brunswick arrosé de diamants ayant précédé la canonnade de Valmy, s'il admit l'abolition de "la monarchie de Louis XVI" très exactement, il refusa néanmoins de façon surprenante de proclamer la république. En discutant et en argumentant avec Georges Danton (1759 - 1794) à ce sujet, il lui répondit qu<i>'"il ne comprenait pas ce mot"!</i> Ils ne la proclamèrent donc pas, et après être parvenus à un compromis, ils décidèrent à la place de créer un calendrier païen débutant le 22 septembre 1792 (début de l'An I), appelé le "calendrier républicain" avec des semaines de 10 jours. L'idée fut immédiatement reprise par le "Montagnard" Jacques-Nicolas Billaud-Varenne (1756 - 1819), qui avait abandonné sa particule (Billaud de Varenne originellement). La Ière République naquit donc de façon indirecte. Et Danton, avec tous les efforts qu'il avait faits pour voler les diamants du "Garde-Meuble de la Couronne" pour le Duc de Brunswick (1735 - 1806), Chef des Prussiens lourdement endetté, suspecta Robespierre d'être un parfait hypocrite aspirant au pouvoir personnel sur le mode dynastique !</p><p><br /></p><p>Robespierre qui avait de la suite dans les idées, avait planifié une grande surprise pour la France dans son quartier général secret de Choisy-Le-Roi, près de Paris. Elle était prévue pour le 10 Thermidor An II ! Il voulait ce jour-là faire arrêter et condamner à la guillotine tous ses opposants (ou supposés tels) à la Convention Nationale, et au Comité de Sûreté Générale...ainsi que quelques membres du Comité qu'il présidait, le Comité de Salut Public. Ceci aurait été grandement facilité par la loi liberticide de 22 Prairial An II (10 juin 1794), qu'il venait de faire voter. La liste complète en avait été dressée par son ami Louis-Antoine de Saint Just (1767 - 1794) du Comité de Salut Public, qui siégeait dans la chambre à coucher de la Reine Marie-Antoinette (1755 - 1793 ou 1834 ?) aux Tuileries.</p><p><br /></p><p>Dans son discret quartier général de Choisy-Le-Roi, Robespierre eût aussi de secrètes rencontres avec la "Mère de Dieu", Catherine Théot (1716 - 1794), qui le considérait comme le "nouveau Messie", le Souverain Pontife de l'Etre Suprême ! Cette étrange médium l'avait initié à son nouveau culte, qui rappelait pour partie la religion de Cybèle de Phrygie justement, et pour partie la religion catholique. Il s'agissait d'un culte éminemment synthétique car elle aimait se faire appeler également la "nouvelle Eve". Et la magnifique fête de l'Etre Suprême du 20 Prairial An II (8 juin 1794), sur le Champ de Mars à Paris, était juste un avant-goût de l'ère nouvelle. Car elle avait prédit que Robespierre allait ramener "l'Age d'Or" en France...et même sur Terre ! Et il semble bien qu'il ait prononcé la célèbre sentence dérivée d'Esope à l'une de ces occasions : "Ranae regem petunt" ! Son plan, selon Vadier qui le dénonça à la tribune de la Convention Nationale le 9 Thermidor An II (27 juillet 1794), était de mettre un terme définitif à la Révolution, en instaurant une Monarchie fantoche au nom d'un Louis XVII (1785 - 1795 ou 1860 ?) temporairement installé.</p><p>En se mariant rapidement avec sa soeur, la Princesse Marie-Thérèse (1778 - 1851) qu'il gardait prisonnière à la Prison du Temple, il entrerait dans la famille Capétienne. Et avec la mort à venir de cet enfant très malade détenu dans la même Prison [qui n'était pas réellement le Dauphin, déjà sauvé secrètement en fait par le Comte de Courtenay et son assistante des Services Secrets Britanniques, Miss Barett - NDLR], il pourrait devenir le nouveau Roi de France ! Marc-Guillaume Vadier (1736 - 1828) n'hésita pas à enflammer la Convention Nationale, car il savait qu'il était parmi les premiers devant être éliminés sur la liste de Saint Just, en tant que Président du Comité de Sûreté Générale ! De plus, Robespierre qui se comportait comme un dictateur, avait protégé Catherine Théot et ses adeptes, en interdisant de les guillotiner, après que Vadier les eût faits arrêter entre temps. Vadier traitait ses ennemis de <i>"Crapauds des Marais", avec une claire allusion aux origine Franques de la Monarchie Française, et en analogie avec les "Grenouilles" de Robespierre !</i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p>Comme beaucoup de gens le savent, Robespierre fut mis en accusation par la Convention Nationale séance tenante le 9 Thermidor An II :<i> ce n'était vraiment pas de chance pour quelqu'un qui avait planifié un coup d'Etat pour le lendemain - son opération "Ranae" si nous lui donnions un nom de code ! </i>Et au lieu de triompher le 10 Thermidor An II (28 juillet 1794), il fut guillotiné avec sa mâchoire rendue complètement inutilisable pour un quelconque usage. Il mourut avec son jeune frère Augustin surnommé "Bonbon", Saint Just, Georges Couthon (1755 - 1794), et ses principaux supporters. Même si la Révolution n'était pas encore totalement terminée, <i>Thermidor est souvent considéré comme le début même de sa fin. </i>Tout le monde se sentait libéré après ces exécutions symboliques et les langues se déliaient. Le Peuple voulait avant tout du pain et son Roi ! L'année suivante, un nouveau régime fut créé pour établir une transition et apaiser la France : le Directoire. Il fut suivi par le Consulat (1799 - 1804). Et cela mena finalement à un nouveau type de Monarchie, le Ier Empire de Napoléon Bonaparte devenu Napoléon Ier (1804 - 1814 et les "Cent Jours" en 1815). </p><p>Durant la Restauration qui suivit (1814-1815 ~ 1815 - 1830), les frères Bourbons de Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?) essayèrent de rétablir durablement la Royauté traditionnelle avec certains aménagements. Et l'une des décisions les plus surprenantes de Louis XVIII (1755 - 1824) notamment, concernait Charlotte de Robespierre (1760 - 1834), la soeur de feu Maximilien de Robespierre : il lui servit une rente trimestrielle pour services rendus (lesquels ?). Il fit également faire une enquête sur Cornélia (Cornélie) de Galéan, Marquise de Janson. Il voulait savoir qui elle était exactement : la vraie Cornélia qui avait juste voulu sauver la Reine, ou bien la Reine Marie-Antoinette elle-même ayant pris son apparence, après s'être échappée de la Prison de la Conciergerie le 30 août 1793, durant l'étrange "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" attribuée à l'audacieux Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) ? </p><p>Comme la "Marquise de Janson" qui vivait à Paris, déclara à la Police que la Reine Marie-Antoinette avait finalement abandonné l'idée d'une substitution avec elle (qui était son très évident sosie), il choisit de laisser courir. Car il avait déjà un autre problème à gérer avec un Moine Belge, qui proclamait être le vrai Louis XVI, sauvé le long du 52 rue Beauregard à Paris le matin du 21 janvier 1793, par le même Baron de Batz. Il choisit d'ignorer la divine menace de son "frère" potentiel, prédisant la chute finale de ses frères royaux qui l'avaient constamment trahi ! Mais, il reconnut néanmoins en Jean de Batz un éminent Royaliste. Et il le récompensa avec la Croix de Saint Louis, et le titre de Maréchal de France comme son lointain parent D'Artagnan (Charles de Batz - 1611~1615 - 1673) ! Le double problème dynastique et familial causé par la "Marquise de Janson" et le "Moine Noir en gris" prédit par Nostradamus (1503 - 1566) dans ses Centuries - Quatrain IX - 20 - fut enterré et oublié dans l'intérêt supérieur de la Monarchie restaurée. Pour être précis, "Moine Noir" était une allusion de Nostradamus au fait que Louis XVI avait prévu d'abolir l'Esclavage comme "non-chrétien" dans les colonies françaises d'outre-mer - ce qui lui valut l'inimitié fatidique du "Parti des Colons". Pour Louis XVIII, son frère aîné et sa belle-soeur serait donc toujours deux épines plantées dans ses pieds endoloris !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>Pour conclure, il est important de remarquer que le co-leadership révolutionnaire entre Danton et Robespierre se termina justement le 21 septembre 1792. </i>Si le matin de ce jour Danton pouvait apparaître triomphant, les choses furent fort différentes pour lui à la fin de la journée, avec le refus de Robespierre mentionné supra. Ce dernier qui avait encore de fort principes, n'aima pas la façon déloyale utilisée par Danton pour se débarrasser de la Monarchie de Louis XVI, avec la question des diamants volés de la Couronne et l'embrouillamini de Valmy. Dès lors, à partir du 21 septembre 1792, Robespierre put émerger comme le seul leader de la France révolutionnaire !</p><p>Robespierre était un incroyable activiste de la cause de<i> l'Abolition de la peine de mort, depuis 1789 : </i>il était si "incroyable", qu'il envoya un nombre incalculable de personnes à la Guillotine ! Et ceci incluait son ex-camarade Danton ainsi que son ami d'enfance du lycée Louis-Le-Grand à Paris, Camille Desmoulins (1760 - 1794). Pour mémoire, le lycée Louis-Le-Grand était le lieu-même où Robespierre avait reçu les félicitations du Roi en personne, pour ses très bons résultats d'élève-boursier ! <i>Et Camille Desmoulins était celui-là même qui avait harangué la foule avec succès </i>- en dépit de son bégaiement habituel - dans les jardins du Palais Royal à Paris, pour qu'elle se soulève contre le Roi après le renvoi de Necker (12 juillet 1789)...<i>ce qui mena deux jours après à la Prise de la Bastille, le 14 juillet 1789 !</i></p><p>En guise d'épilogue à la période post-révolutionnaire, l'avènement de Louis-Philippe, Duc d'Orléans (1773 - 1850), comme "Roi des Français" et non plus "Roi de France" en 1830, démontra la faiblesse de la Monarchie des Bourbons depuis la disparition de Louis XVI. La question de la lignée de Louis XVI fut embrouillée délibérément. De là, sa branche cousine reçut le trône pour quelques temps, du fait de la soudaine ré-implication de Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de la Fayette (1757 - 1834) !</p><p>Très étonnamment, il doit être souligné quelque chose d'habituellement non remarqué ou de passé sous silence à propos des "Trois Glorieuses" (27, 28 et 29 juillet 1830), quand Charles X fut détrôné : si vous faites attention aux dates, elles commencèrent clairement le 9 Thermidor, juste comme la chute inattendue de Robespierre ! Etait-ce par un caprice du ciel, ou en accord avec l'avertissement fatidique du "Moine Noir en gris" ?</p><p>Depuis lors, la France a toujours hésité concernant son système politique, hérité à la fois de l'époque de la Royauté et de celles de la Révolution et de l'Empire très paradoxalement. C'est pourquoi notre présent système peut apparaître comme le résultat d'une synthèse dialectique, et donc particulièrement hybride. Par conséquent, la seule trouvaille restante est la persistance de l'antique fable citée par Robespierre : "Ranae regem petunt" ("Les grenouilles veulent un roi") !</p><p>De nos jours, on peut présumément appeler ce roi un "monarque-président" sous la Constitution Gaulliste de 1958, depuis le référendum de 1962 pour son élection au suffrage universel. Et le fait est que la lutte politique pour le pouvoir suprême en France, devient soudainement très chaude lorsque les élections présidentielles approchent. C'est le temps des slogans renouvelés et de l'utopie, mais aussi du réalisme pragmatique pour éviter la dislocation irrémédiable de la base et de l'héritage Francs - dans les occurrences les plus étonnantes ! </p><p><br /></p><p><i><br /></i></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-27721163270237242742022-11-19T03:11:00.009-08:002022-11-28T01:33:17.542-08:00Just science-fiction LVI : the unveiling of Poseidon's secrets !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>The story we are going to narrate today, centered around the character of God Poseidon, is surprising and complex. It necessitates to be able to come back before what we call history, so very far in the past. Of course, as usually what we will describe has to be taken as just science-fiction, nothing else ! So enjoy your reading !</p><p><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> ******</span><br /></p><p>In general, Atlantis ("l'Atlantide" in French) is associated with Alpha Centaurians, who are Amphibians. But it musn't be forgotten that those ETs came to Earth between others at the same time as Sirians - another type of Amphibians - and Arcturians, under the supervision of Pleiadians. The commander-in-chief of the mission to recreate a highly developped life on Earth 21 000 years ago, was a Pleiadian prince of the Royal House of the Pleiades : this happened towards the end of the strong climatic change of the Würm period (Glaciation provoked by the Sun). <i>"Pleiadians" </i>were called this way by the Greeks, as they were considered as <i>"Navigators" in Space...and Earth.</i> And the now famous Poseidon was among the same team !</p><p>They arrived on Earth on the day of Halloween. That's why this celebration has remained so important for them through ages. And at that time, the new year was happening the day after, on november 1st, with a very clement weather. So it's not astonishing to have a rather mild weather on that day even now, when you know that Pleiadians are retaking presently their power on Earth. Nowadays, they are difficult to recognize among the normal population, except sometimes for their unusual powers or abilities...and their young age in old age ! And Poseidon had certainly exceptional powers and abilities !</p><p><br /></p><p>What people intend to connect to the present "Climatic Change" with a sickly frenzy, is just a return to an antediluvian weather ! Earth is just being reconnected to the Pleiadian time and weather ! It doesn't mean at all it is dying...but quite reviving on the contrary ! The present weather conditions are now better and better for their skin and their breathing. As a matter of fact, "good boys" and "good girls" are working for them, without knowing it, on the climate topic - with an excess in ignorance they don't always like yet. Of course, the latters have at least an excuse : a still backward science founded on prejudices, blended with a deep misunderstanding of the basic needs of photosynthesis in term of CO2 to produce our Oxygen in spite of deforestation !</p><p>So very naturally, the brilliant civilization of Atlantis is owing its genesis to this prospect. According to what we know, it seems <i>Poseidon (the "Soil Shaker" for Greeks) </i>was connected himself to the royal house of the Pleiades, and at the same time to the one of Alpha Centauri. And it's not surprising to discover then that he was the one chosen to create this legendary thalassocracy, with its antic prolongations marked by pyramids in Africa, in Americas, and in Eurasia (Crimea, China, Japan...). And the ten offsprings (five pairs of twins) he had with the famous mortal Clitô, became the ten first co-kings of Atlantis !</p><p><br /></p><p>Thus, the God of Seas, Oceans, Earthquakes and Sources was not only a Pleiadian ruler, but also an Alpha Centaurian one because of his double kinship and blue blood. At this point, we have to recall that a Pleiadian or an Alpha Centaurian is possessing more than five senses : usually, both of them have at least eight senses (our five senses plus telepathy, psychokinesis, and foresight), or even more concerning princes and princesses. Only human beings believe that there are only five senses, due to their usual self-centered limitations. However, it's true the most advanced of them recognize the existence of a "sixth sense", encompassing in fact several other guessed senses !</p><p>In connection with the Pleiades, it has to be added they are localized in the Constellation of Taurus. This localization is the key to understand the development of so many civilizations on Earth. And a lot of people know how the cult of Taurus (or Buffalo for American natives) has been important in antic civilizations, including in Egypt with the Bull God Apis. And the bullfighting of Atlantis (in the antediluvian time) or Creta (thereafter) is bearing witness of this cultural inheritage...still very present in Spain and the South of France with Corrida ! The hidden permanence of Pleiadian culture is really something extraordinary in present time. It is also quite strong, even in France where the combat against Corrida has been lost only a few days ago !</p><p><br /></p><p>In the religious field, the Mithraïc cult (centered around the Bull) that has blended with the early Christianity, is also a lasting observable fact. Our main Christian celebration of Christmas on December 25th (very important in Mithraism too) based upon the Roman Saturnalia as well, is an astonishing common point with the Pleiadian civilization - and the complete one of Orion equally ! In fact, Christianity has been the result of a kind of synthesis between several religious currents at the Roman time, just like the character of Jesus Christ. And the latter would certainly have difficulties to recognize himself, after the excessive conquests of Paulinism, where so many people are allowed to marry except him - in total contradiction with Saint John Gospel, III-27 sq ! Poor Maria-Magdalena !</p><p>So, even we don't worship anymore God Poseidon, he is still staying quite powerful in the Atlantic Ocean or in all the Oceans and Seas of the globe, as well as in Rivers and Sources. And in a way, Poseidon is also reigning occasionally on inhabited lands too as the "Soil Shaker". Anyhow, he is remaining the original creator of the empire of Atlantis. Through him, the "Navigators of Space" have become the "Navigators of Earth". And if some places out of the Atlantic Ocean have been confused with Atlantis itself, in total contradiction with "the Timaeus" and "Critias" of Plato (c. 428 - c. 347 BC), it's because they were remarkable colonies or extensions on Earth ! </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As an epilogue, the history of Atlantis is both connected to Pleiadians and Alpha Centaurians. For instance, nowadays a city called the "Complex T3" is established below the water along the airport of Sao Miguel island (the main island of Azores). And it is said to be secretely co-managed by the American Navy and Alpha Centaurians, with the presence of a Pleiadian supervisor. </p><p>When we visited Sao Miguel on Christmas 2016, we could see the lights of this submarine city from the plane, at the departure from the airport of Ponta Delgada. As we didn't visit the Complex, we cannot confirm these assumptions. But, at the same time neither can we deny them. Azores (Portugal) since the works of the German Jesuit Athanasius Kircher (1602 - 1680) are still considered to be a part of the remains of the lost continent of Atlantis, by some specialists. So Atlantis musn't be confused with the island of Thera, an ancient Atlantean colony near Creta, in the Mediterranean Sea as for it !</p><p>And mind yourself when you travel in the Triangle of Bermuda in the Atlantic Ocean, or in the Devil's Sea ("Ma-no-Umi") near Japan, also called the Devil's Triangle or the Formosa Triangle ! Over there, Alpha Centaurians are at work as the remaining heirs of the Atlantean Empire, not totally vanished then. The very recent US-Australian movie "Aquaman" (2018) is subtly centered about this speculation, without mentioning Alpha-Centaurians : it is stressing <i>a silent war between hidden submarine "Atlanteans" and polluters "Surfacians" of Earth </i>! Of course, if you respect them and come friendly, you have nothing to worry for your plane or your boat, as they are usually benevolent !</p><p><br /></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-8599818758556354492022-10-24T22:52:00.011-07:002022-10-25T00:52:56.028-07:00Just science-fiction LV : the mystery of Men with fat calves !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>The tale we are narrating today is just for fun. It must only be taken as an amusement and a masterpiece of imagination then. According to Lucian of Samosata (c. 120 AD - c. 190 AD), the mystery of Men with fat calves is connected to the Moon. The latter was inhabited (just like the Sun or the Pleiades). And over there, babies were produced and carried by Men, not by Women ! </p><p>Most likely from Greek origin, Lucian was born in Syria on the banks of Euphrates (a part of the Roman Empire at his time). And he liked a lot to joke about life. His works were written for fun, and he wanted them... not to be taken seriously !</p><p>The mystery of Men with fat calves is then going to be uncovered again to you, far after the death of Lucian. And it will definitively amaze you, as they sometimes came to Earth on visit to meet beautiful<span> </span>Earthling Women - just like the famous Nephilim's fathers of the Bible !</p><p> *******</p><p>Among other writings, the "True history" Lucian of Samosata wrote led him to the Moon and the Sun, and even further than the famous Pleiades (called "M45" in modern astronomers' language). In his trip to the Moon, Lucian discovered that babies were born from Men swollen calves over there ! Men's pregnancies for reproduction were happening because there was no women, according to him. It can seem strange, but it could be the main reason they wanted to come to Earth to meet beautiful Earthling women !</p><p>Of course, Lucian didn't have any rocket at that time. So the travel he made was just realized through his own imagination and dreams...as well as unpredictables winds. Those unusual winds could be found beyond the Columns of Hercules in the "Atlantic Sea" and what seems to be America (yet unknown at that time), with its Women-Vines ! And obviously, he wasn't at all expecting to be believed. As a warning to his work, he even asked paradoxically readers to consider his "True history" as untrue...which they didn't really do because of the human sense of contradiction !</p><p>This idea of Men of the Moon carrying babies in their calves is recalling a famous Greek myth : the birth of Dionysos who came out Zeus' thig. The supreme God of Greek pantheon is also famous for having given birth to Athena, who came out of his head all armed ! And the concept of parthenogenesis is directly attached to her strange conception. Men being below Zeus (Jupiter for the Romans), it is logic in a way he had placed Moon's babies below the thigh, in calves - inferior members : he showed this way his deference towards the great Zeus !</p><p>The fantasy work of Lucian of Samosata as regards the Men of the Moon, is then highlighting a kind of peculiar parthenogenesis - answering a necessity. He is considered nowadays as an astonishing and pleasant Philosopher of the IInd century with a lot of imagination. Incidentally, he had the peculiarity not to appreciate Aristotle (384 - 322 BC), he found very boring and quite limiting for human thinking : he was considering him as a rather false master to think ! And he was personalizing "Philosophia" as the daughter of Zeus, so not considering it just as a life concept !</p><p>Even Arnold Schwarzenegger (born in Austria in 1947) in his movie "Junior" (1994), is carrying a baby in his belly, and not in one of his calf. "Junior" is an Hollywood fairly recent comedy produced and directed by Ivan Reitman (1946 - 2022). As an aside, Ivan Reitman who was a very creative cineast was born in Slovakia and died in Montecito (California, USA) on last february. And World Cinema will miss him a lot. In "Junior", the Austrian Doctor Alex Hesse (Arnold Schwarzenegger) is making the very funny experiment of being pregnant, to demonstrate the benefits and the safety of his friend's new method, the gynecologist Larry Arbogast (Danny DeVito) !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The work of Lucian of Samosata wasn't just a crazy satyr of society in the IInd century AD (under Pax Romana). He went further than that, as the first known writer of Science-Fiction. And his tone was both humoristic and fair in his very unusual and striking descriptions !</p><p>The evocation of a big War between the inhabitants of the Moon and the ones of the Sun, with a kind of unexpected truce preparing an agreement to finally establish Peace, could be taken as more than an allegory !</p><p>Even nowadays, some specialists of the Cosmos and Earth are discreetly wondering about an interminable Galactic war, notably between the strong Pleiadians and their ex-brothers from Aldebaran sheltered in Antarctica with Martian survivors and a human core (the "Black Fleet")... or Alpha Draconians for the control of Earth, the Moon and Mars, for instance ! </p><p>And we are not talking either of the strong influence of Venusians and the small Zetas in Asia for new technologies and high tech rockets, aircrafts and weapons...or in America and Europe with the "Woke" movement and also the one impulsing "Climatic change" initiated in the Fifties, with Andromedans as well. About the latter, they wanted to be able to breathe better on Earth ! </p><p>Of course this is just another example, as we could have spoken too about the renewed interactions of Sirians - amphibians from Sirius B - in Africa (Mali, Burkina Fasso, Niger, Horn of Africa..) or in Europe equally (to regain control on the 7 energetic pyramids of Crimea, between Sebastopol and Cape Sarych, recalling the 7 Pleiades)... not to mention Alpha Centaurians (equally amphibians) in the Triangle of Bermuda or in the Devil Triangle near Japan !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-490271864376028372022-09-19T03:48:00.005-07:002022-09-28T23:05:51.386-07:00Uchronic history XVII : back to the Merovingian time !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>This uchronic narration could at once remind you of memories, and at the same time confuse you because of some historical elements out of the shadows we decided to add !</p><p> ******</p><p>Present time is strange : it seems we have come back to old time, to the Merovingian one to be more precise. Before France came to existence, there was once a little kingdom in Tournai (Belgium), where a small king was reigning after the death of his father, Childéric I (c. 436 - 481 or 482). It doesn't appear in chronicles that Clovis I (c. 466 - 511) was using a crystal ball like his father. But in fact, nobody knows ! Let's recall that his dad after having totally lost once his kingdom of Tournai, was unexpectedly able to recover it because of the strategic use of his discrete talents of Seer !</p><p>Clovis was certainly a thaumaturge King, but not the same type as his father. He cleverly seized the opportunity of Roman definite decline to build his own power. <i>The main remain of Clovis I is to have passed from a tribal mentality (Salian Franks) to a nation one (all Franks) !</i> He was believing in Odin, Thor, and Freya ! But the new nation he built from Belgium Second to what became Neustria (the ancient kingdom of Syagrius) and more widely Francia was transmutated by a new powerful belief coming from his wife since 493, Princess Clotilda (c. 474 - 545) : she was the niece of Gondebaud, King of Burgunds, and a strong Roman Catholic !</p><p>In 486, Clovis I defeated the Gallo-Roman kingdom of Syagrius (c. 430 - 487) near Soissons, which became so famous for the story of its memorable vase afterwards. Syagrius himself fled away and took refuge at Alaric II (c. 460 - 507), King of Wisigoths. But the latter emprisonned and delivered him in 487 to Clovis I ; then, Syagrius was executed in his previous capital, Soissons, as the last Gallo-Roman King. In 496,King Clovis had also to fight in a very uncertain battle against the Alamans in Tolbiac (Zülpich, Germany nowadays). Having promised Clotilda to make himself Christian if he was able to win the battle with her God's help, he was baptized in Reims by Saint Rémi on Christmas day...with 3000 of his men ! <i>So then King Clovis became "the eldest son of the Church",</i> <i>before France was nicknamed "the eldest daughter of the Church" till nowadays.</i> And he chose Paris to be his capital, not Soissons (Syagrius' capital) !</p><p><span>Eleven years later (507), he forced the road to Aquitania and defeated King Alaric II in Vouillé (near one of my aunts' domain), not far from Poitiers. Alaric II (arian Christian) died during the battle and his famous treasure disappeared mysteriously...before becoming almost mythical in present times. To make an interesting </span>aside, this treasure is often confused nowadays with the one of Cathars (Manicheans rather influenced by Gnostics and arian Christians), or even the one of the abbot Bérenger Saunière (1852 - 1917) from Rennes-le-Château. After the great defeat of Vouillé, Wisigoths were forced to retreat to Spain in the debacle...for a while ! So then, Clovis was able to conquer Aquitania (as wide as present New Aquitania) as well, by extending greatly his kingdom !</p><p><span><br /></span></p><p><span><br /></span></p><p><span><br /></span></p><p>As an epilogue, at the end of his life <i>Clovis I </i>left a surprising kingdom starting from Aquilon (North), but expanding thereafter from West to East, as well as South :<i> he was at the very origin of Francia Occidentalis (now France), and Francia Orientalis (Germany). </i>The divisions of his realm after his death in 511 are due to the fact he left four sons : his big kingdom was divided by inheritage between them. The principle of primogeniture didn't exist among Merovingians. It only came to existence from the Capetians, a long time after. And in between, there was another dynasty partly proceeding by marriages from Merovingians. <i>At that time, being Mayor of the Palace was the most envied and powerful position. </i>And it provoked definitively the first dynastic change, from Merovingians to Carolingians, with Pépin the Brief (meaning Pépin "the Small", 714 - 768) !</p><p>The new France of 2022 is not so different from the France of the beginnings now on. <i>With the return of tribal thinking,</i> it is reapproching what it used to be. This time travel can bring us back at <i>the time of Wamba (c. 633 - c. 688). This last great Wisigoth King (arian Christian)</i> who was forced to become King by his people : he was crowned in Toledo (Spain) on September 21st, 672. King Wamba (most likely a nickname meaning "the Belly") once dominated Septimania - present Occitania very roughly. And he was able to reign on the South of France from Toulouse area to Nîmes. If his French realm didn't survive for long his final abdication, it certainly passed into the hands of his Saracen allies thereafter till another famous battle, near Poitiers again (in 732). This historical battle was won by the Frank Mayor of the Palace, Charles Martel (Karl Martell in German, c. 688 - 741), father of Pépin the Brief, and grandfather of Charlemagne (c. 742 - 814) !</p><p>Again, it is not clearly known if <i>the once famous Bathilda (c. 630 - 680), who was bought to Danish pirates as a Slave by Erchinoald (580 - 658 or 661), Mayor of the Palace of Neustria, was in fact originally an Anglo-Saxon Princess ? </i>But she changed totally her status - or recovered it - when she happened to finally marry King Clovis II "the Lazy" (633 - 657). She would have deserved to be far more remembered because of what she accomplished during the life of her husband, and continued as Queen Regent after his death. As a matter of fact, <i>under her strong influence and rule, Slavery was totally forbidden in the Frank kingdom...so far before the unsuccessful project of King Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), </i>which is the the real and well hidden reason of his dramatic fall, provoked by the very discrete but influential Colonists "Party" !</p><p>One doesn't know exactly when toads - often confused with frogs - were replaced by marsh iris and then by lilies, to symbolize French Monarchy since King Clovis I. It may be connected to the fact this King converted to Catholic religion by following his wife Clotilda (from Christmas 496). Toads can be found in marshes beside iris (the first Merovingian flowers), and lilies (the second Merovingian flowers) are associated to Mary the Virgin, who is so important for her miracles on the impossible in Catholicism. Strangely, lilies were also a symbol of power, faith, and rebirth for Pharaohs ! And unexpectedly, the "Agenda 2030" of the World Economic Forum of Davos (Switzerland) is symbolized by a multicolored Crown surmonted by a Lily ! The "Great Reset" announced could be a resurrection one then !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-29416912138362297372022-08-28T01:27:00.007-07:002022-11-20T09:59:32.937-08:00 Just science-fiction LIV : the way of Lemming !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>The dramatic developments of the War in Ukraine, with the very high risk of a nuclear leaking [or even massive explosion (s)] of the nuclear plant of Zaporijjia (presently held by Russia), whoever is in reality bombing its closest surroundings, have inspired us this article of anticipation.</p><p> ******</p><p>The nearest cousin of human beings among mammals isn't monkey, but the lemming in reality. The specialists of the so-called Evolution, following Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882), are wrong. And Human Beings, males or females, are involuting and not at all evolving, by looking for their own disappearing.</p><p>Cleverness and wiseness aren't the main characteristics of real humans. It's not true ! Human beings are at the summit of the alimentary chain because they are superpredators, that's all. On other planets, for instance, they are not at all at the top, and that's why they are so easily denying the existence of intelligent beings overthere ! Their fake science and knowledge are just an easy excuse.</p><p><br /></p><p>With human beings, it is not difficult to make predictions or even prophecies, because of human nature. Say a human being whatever the gender has got three options, a wise one, a stupid one, and a stupid and dangerous one. What do you think he or she will choose in 90% cases ? The surprising answer is the most stupid and dangerous one !</p><p>Nowadays, some so-called specialists of Lemmings are claiming that those small aggressive, or even very aggressive rodents of Artic areas, are not suiciding in mass during their migration. But it is hard to believe ! The fact is this species is almost disappearing from Nature every four years, by being almost extinguished then. Lemmings seem guided from Cosmos towards an agreed meeting point, and are drowned en route in the fjords. So then, it is exact at least, that they do not fall systematically from cliffs ! Anyhow, their travel to more consciousness is then ending badly !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>To conclude, after our metaphor about Lemmings, it is certainly time to explain to the general public and to pupils at school what to do in case of nuclear accident (...if not bombing). At the moment, it is yet not done !</p><p>About the winds around Zaporijjia (central Ukraine, area of Enerhodar), they can be oriented towards the East (Eastern Ukraine, Russia and Asia), as well as the West (Western Ukraine, Central and Western Europe, France included). And nobody knows if the leaking of radioactive materials hasn't in reality already started from the damaged giant nuclear plant (consisting of six reactors...or potential nuclear bombs), when following the warnings of Energoatom !</p><p>The planned visit of the fourteen representatives from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is then quite important. And international measures must be taken to secure the site for the preservation of Eurasia ! The memories of the nuclear catastrophe of the smaller Plant of Tchernobyl, near Kiev (in 1986) are still vivid !</p><p>A distribution of potassium iodide should be prepared and implemented, as it has been done prevently in Belgium at the beginning of this War of lethal stubborness...which has become a World War of Energy, Cereals and Raw Materials ! And of course, Peace instead of War (extremely dangerous for the security of Eurasia and the World), should be absolutely researched. Because, it is already obvious there may be no winner but only desperate losers throughout this major conflict ! </p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-52474097610786816542022-07-25T01:30:00.024-07:002023-10-05T09:25:57.538-07:00Rediscovering famous characters X : the greatest dentist of Central America !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>You will certainly have difficulties in finding who is our character of the day, as this man is incidentaly known in history for totally opposite things than dentistry. </p><p>He was living in Central America in the VIIth century. He was a Maya of the city-state of Palenque (Chiapas, Mexico). But in fact, he remained unknown for centuries till 1952, with the discovery and the excavation of his tumb (also called "the Temple of inscriptions") ! </p><p>Let's rediscover together this astonishing man, who has been able to recently stress the whole world with his strange oracle abilities, founded on Venusian computation and astrology !</p><p> *******</p><p>Of course, you are puzzled because you have never heard about our mysterious character of the day as a dentist...even since 1952. The reason is his vocation has been largely hidden till now. Him, he was just happy when operating with the pretty Tz'akb'u, his sparkling assistant...and wife. He was a specialist of bridges of really any kind, from obsidian to emerald (the stone of Venus)! </p><p>His technique was very comparable to the one of the best dentists of Etruria (presently Tuscany, Italy) from the VIIIth century BC. The devices he made were so solid, than you can find them practically intact on bodies decomposed by time. Actually, they are what you can see first ! It has to be added also that "Venusian" emerald bridges were of the latest chic in the Mayan civilization. Yet they were not the most common !</p><p>Unclear circumstances in connection with the observation of anomalies on Planet Venus built his sudden destiny. Because of his lineage and the call of Cosmos, he was in a way forced by the Sun Great Priest to become King (615 - 683) at twelve, as well as a kind of holy Venusian oracle for Mayas thereafter, </p><p>Do you guess at this stage who we are talking about ? It's difficult, especially if you are not a specialist of Central America in the precolombian time. So we better uncover his name : nowadays he is called Pacal Votan (603 - 683), King - "Ahau" or "Sovereign" - of the Mayan city-state of Palenque !</p><p>Pacal Votan (K'inich Janaab' Pakal or "Shield against the Radiating Sun") is remaining famous nowadays for the "Telektonon", also better nicknamed "the Prophecy of the Vth Sun" concerning the destiny of whole mankind. This prophecy stressed a lot the whole world at the approach of December 21st, 2012 ! </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>In conclusion, many specialists have totally missed what Pacal considered as his true vocation : the art of dentistry ! And they missed as well t</i><i>he rule of 9 years plus one of this King also nicknamed "the Magician of Time"! </i></p><p>And as they were misleaded by the Moon, by calling his prophecy "the prophecy of the thirteen moons", they totally underestimated the power of the Sun on world climate change and mega fires all over the world we can presently observe !</p><p>Besides, the dentistry technique of Pacal ("the Shield") hasn't been studied enough till now. It is certain we have a lot to learn from him. By comparison, the best modern bridges are guaranteed only 15 years. They are not at all expected to last centuries after the death of the patient, at the difference of the ones of King Pacal !</p><p>It has to be added the touch of the pretty Tz'akb'u, his assistant, was certainly determining in the quality of dental amalgams. Tz'akb'u was in fact a Mayan princess who had a strong sense of service. In Nah Chan (the real Mayan name of Palenque), she was the subject of a certain devotion during her lifetime !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-89262811767835522362022-06-06T09:06:00.004-07:002022-07-02T23:48:32.008-07:00Rediscovering famous characters IX : the surprises of Figaro and the Countess de Bartholo !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>By seeing the name of Figaro, you may think we intend to talk a lot about Beaumarchais (1732 - 1799) who wrote "The crazy day, or the marriage of Figaro" (1778). Yet, it's not at all the case in fact. Of course, we will present him quickly. But he is not the famous character we want you to rediscover today.</p><p>In reality, his famous play is just an unexpected angle to help you rediscovering two of his occasional actor and actress. Those two persons were quite improbable to play what was a very strong criticism of the old system of orders in the Old Regime (Nobility, Clergy, and Third Estate).</p><p>In this avant-garde play taking place in Sevilla (Andalucia, Spain), two main characters are appearing to us : firstly, Figaro who is just a servant, angry against his master Count Almaviva who wants to use his right of lord on his beloved Suzanne before their marriage ; secondly, the Countess de Bartholo (previously called simply Rosine in "the Barber of Sevilla") whose servants are encouraging her with difficulty to have affair to ignore her husband, the Count de Bartholo - her ex-tutor who had obliged her to marry him and was yet rejecting her. For the latter, she was rather encouraged to behave like a man would do in her situation. The bridge between Figaro and the Countess de Bartholo, is resulting from the hidden fact that the Count de Bartholo is in fact the real father of Figaro !</p><p>Both Figaro and the Countess de Bartholo, are rather acting as if they should be naturally equal in front of love, each one on his side into a very hierarchichal society (with a division in the three unequal orders quoted above). And this was really revolutionary. By comparison, nowadays writers are far more frilous about the unsaid and underlying subdivisions of our still unequal and newly feudalistic society : they just search to be the most politically correct they can be !</p><p>And when you will know who we are talking about, by giving the names of the actor and actress who interpreted with success this play in Versailles, you may fall from your seat ! So get ready to enter the incredibly bold XVIIIth century, and make an enormous and amazing discovery ! You are leaving this rather jellyfied beginning of XXIst century for a time travel into a daredevil epoch !</p><p> ******</p><p>Initially, Pierre Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais was a watchmaker like his father. But he made a very good marriage with a wealthy widow, which helped him to approach the daughters of Louis XV (1710 - 1774). He was amusing for them, and quite a good musician. Later he became a secret agent of the Black Cabinet of this King, and an arms dealer. During the reign of Louis XVI (1754- 1793 ?), he provided weapons to the Insurgents of America. And as secondary activity, he became famous as a play writer with two great comedies, "The Barber of Sevilla" (1775) and its following ,"The crazy day, or the marriage of Figaro" (1784).</p><p>When you see those two different dates for "The marriage of Figaro" (1778 and 1784), you can realize it took Beaumarchais around six years for his masterpiece to be really launched, but not yet accepted. Hence, we have to quote the final acceptation was only possible afterwards under conditions. To be played in Versailles after Odeon theater in Paris, and to circumvent the obstacles of censorship (coming from the vehement protests of Nobility), he had to accept two precise persons to be able to play ! Don't forget the play had been forbidden on March 7th, 1785 as scandalous and too daring, and yet especially re-authorized on August 16th, 1785 for his representation in the Theater of Menus Plaisirs of Versailles !</p><p>At this stage, do you guess who we are talking about ? Perhaps, you have a strange sensation, but not yet ! You probably still wonder who were those two improbable, but important actor and actress. In order to help you finding, try to imagine the most unlikely characters...really the most improbable for such a daring comedy ! Of course, you will have to admit those two occasional players were quite bold, provocative, or playful to play such a sulphurous comedy promoting Equality of rights and genders, if not natural children for the time !</p><p>Well, it's now time to lift the curtain and stop the suspense. In Versailles Court, in front of King Louis XVI, Figaro was interpreted by his younger brother, the Count of Artois, future Charles X (1757 - 1836), and the Countess de Bartholo by Queen Marie-Antoinette herself (1755 - 1793 or 1834 ?). The Count of Artois wasn't himself very admirative of the nobles from the Court of Versailles, and it's him who decided the Queen to participate the comedy together !</p><p>A lot of people nowadays are ignoring that the Count of Artois was at that time rather original and provocative. Above that, he was getting on very well with his sister-in-law he appreciated far more than his other brother, Louis Stanislas Xavier, Count of Provence, the future Louis XVIII (1755 - 1824). In a way, through this comedy he wanted to show Marie-Antoinette, that she had a proximate and real French friend in the Court of Versailles, him !</p><p>Marie-Antoinette about her was fed up with the unfair, boring, and unstraight attitude of many nobles in the Court, and she was still a mischievous pretty young woman coming from the Court of Vienna, in Austria ! Above that, on March 27th, 1785, she had happily given birth to a second potential Dolphin, Louis-Charles, Duke of Normandy (future Louis XVII : 1785 - Northern England in UK 1794 - 1860 most likely in reality) and reassured her position in France. So, it wasn't difficult for her to be convinced by her brother-in-law, Charles, to have fun for once. Don't forget the music of the play was from Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756- 1791) from Vienna too !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>After having attended this very politically incorrect play,</i> clearly directed against the privileges of Aristocracy and claiming for Equality, <i>Louis XVI</i> seemed to just take it as a satire. But yet, he couldn't prevent <i>saying rather propheticallly :</i> <i>"the representation could be nothing but an unwelcome inconsistency, unless the Bastille was destroyed" !</i> Everybody knows today he was absolutely right in his strange insight !</p><p>Let's add as an epilogue, that the Count of Artois played indirectly<i> nolens volens</i> a role in the coming Revolution ...and Counter-Revolution as well ! <i>Jean-Paul Marat (1743 - 1793), his doctor, </i>became afterwards an important revolutionary. <i>And the Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822),</i> equally from his house was chosen to be his Deputy at the General Estates of May 1789. And he became a top leader of the Counter-Revolution, as the last Secretary of the Black Cabinet of King Louis XVI -<i> id est </i>his last Chief of French Secret Services !</p><p>Still about the incredibly bold Baron Jean de Batz, it's him who organized two operations of the last chance, two operations of rescues for their Majesties : the first one happened in the very morning of January 21st, 1793 along the 52 rue Beauregard in Paris with a Double of the King, a Belgian monk, and the second in the night of August 30th, 1793, at the way out of the Conciergerie Jail in Paris with a Double of the Queen, Cornélia de Galéan, during the uncommon "Carnation Conspiracy" ! Still nowadays, it is extremely difficult to know in reality if those black operations failed...or on the contrary succeeded by luck, as they are still considered as Ultra Top Secret - <i>"for your eyes only" ! So, don't repeat !</i></p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-30212798187671121382022-05-20T15:28:00.026-07:002022-05-27T11:06:29.628-07:00Just science-fiction LIII : the resurgence of God Râ !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>This new article of one of our mascot series, "Just science-fiction", is dedicated to the alien God Râ, and the strange manifestations of his supreme power throughout centuries till now. Of course, as usually you can take it as a masterpiece of imagination, and nothing else.</p><p><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><span> ******</span><br /></p><p>At the time of Pharaoh Snefru (circa 2670 BC ? - c. 2589 BC ?), Ist Pharaoh of the IVth dynasty, Râ wasn't yet the supreme God of the Egyptian pantheon : the dominant clergy was still the one of Ptah ("the one who created") in Memphis, from which is deriving the very name of Egypt. One event, seemingly of small importance, changed everything for centuries and centuries...till now. And that's the most astonishing, when you think about it !</p><p>One day Snefru was terribly bored, and he asked an adviser what to do. This adviser was a famous Egyptian magician called Djedjaemonkh. The latter just suggested him to have a little cruise on the Nile river with twenty pretty girls. This didn't seem especially magical, but it became so because of an incident : one of the young women playing around suddenly dropped her hair-jewel in the Nile, and it seemed lost for ever.</p><p>She was so sad, that Snefru asked for the help of Djedjaemonkh to recover it. The magician did it. He just invoked an alien God, Râ (still a challenger of God Ptah at that time), and did something incredible : he was able to open the Nile in two where the loss had happened, and on the over suddenly dried part, he could easily find the precious hair-jewel of the pretty young woman in front of Snefru, his son Souphis-Chembes (future Pharaoh Khufu, Kheops in Greek), and the twenty pretty girls, among other witnesses !</p><p><br /></p><p>This apparently anecdotal event impressed a lot the future Pharaoh Kheops, who changed wholly the hierarchy of Gods when he came to power : he made Râ, God of the Sun with a head of Falcon, the supreme God of the Egyptian pantheon, and then sidelined the previously dominant clergy of Ptah in Memphis. Hence, he encouraged the quick development of Râ's clergy by writing the "Holy Books" (according to Manetho, IVth century - IIIrd century BC). And it became the dominant one radiating from Heliopolis about it, till...nowadays for ancient Egypt !</p><p>Râ is noticeably associated with the personal protection of Pharaohs. His efficiency has always been recalled through the persistent enigma of the curse of Pharaohs ! This curse has become particularly famous, after the spectacular discovery of Tutankhamun's magnificent tumb by Howard Carter (1874 - 1939) and Lord George Herbert Carnavon (1866 - 1923) in 1922. Tutankhamun was an enigmatic Pharaoh of the end of the XVIIIth dynasty (c. 1345 - c. 1327 BC), who died around 18 in very unclear circumstances. Anecdotally, his dagger which was recovered with his rich treasure was made of a strange unknown alloy on Earth !</p><p>Nowadays, cartesians and debunkers are easily negating this curse, which was precisely the following : <i>"Death will fall with its wings on whoever disturbs Pharaoh's rest !" </i>This heavy sentence was found on a tablet disposed beside Pharaoh Tutankhamun, as a warning of God Râ ! And in spite of the long sequence of suprising and fateful deaths which happened after the opening of Tutankhamun's tumb as far as London or anywhere else, their logic has been to treat them as mere coincidences. And when Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859 - 1930), was attributed the origin of the "legend" of the malediction of Pharaohs, a lot of people were quoting he was just a famous novelist ("Sherlock Holmes"...). But they had forgotten his original job was to be a Doctor in medicine ! And as a Doctor, he just wanted to point out strange and common anomalies in the numerous and successive deaths registered : all of them affected invariably the respiratory system !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>To conclude, the God Râ is straightly associated with the possibility of life on Earth, as the Sun is in itself the source of every life. And the teachings of Râ are recalling human beings their fragility in front of him. The Sun has always been stronger than human creatures to allow life on Earth, plants included. And whatever their technology or bad use of modernity could be, Râ (meaning directly "the Sun" in old Egyptian) is remaining so ! If entire civilisations were disappearing over suddenly due to the imminent IIIrd World War, or in terrible civil wars - because of an unwise stubborness as well as a worrysome and encouraged community spirit -, the Sun otherly called Râ would remain in the Sky with his power unchanged !</p><p>Coming back to the curse of Pharaohs, observers noticed that Howard Carter, the co-discoverer of Tutankhmun's tumb (KV62) with Lord Carnavon, didn't die from lungs sudden illness about him. At the difference of so many people connected to their discovery in the Valley of Kings, he survived without any problem. And to them, it's an evidence the malediction of Pharaohs is a complete invention. Of course, they are forgetting he did something special when he discovered Tutankhamun's mummy : he took out his ring and put it on one of his finger... and kept it this way. This ring which happened to be protective was called <i>"the ring of Râ" !</i></p><p>A lot of sensational pictures of Hollywood have been made about Pharaohs and their mummies. In the ancient Egyptian beliefs, those Pharaohs under this form...are not really dead. If they survive in the Amenti (Occident), they can surprisingly come back to life under unusual circumstances involving an ancestral religious process. But another thing is sure, they don't like to be touched by impure hands : for example, at the unwrapping of the shroud surrounding the mummy of another famous Pharaoh, Ramses II (1304 - 1213 BC), one of his arm suddenly rose by hitting the face of the unwelcome ! Scientists explained the mystery with a trick involving a ray of the Sun provoking a sudden reflex movement : it wasn't stupid knowing the Sun was justly called Râ by ancient Egyptians !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-26938272462655667822022-04-23T23:30:00.067-07:002022-05-27T11:06:39.112-07:00Just science-fiction LII : Blue Beam and the strange power of ZIM !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>__________________________</p><p>This is a new article of one of our mascot series, "Just science-fiction", where we are going to talk again about Pleiadians. You know very well they are supposed not to exist or even have never existed ! </p><p>Yet, according to what happened mostly in the French Sky on last April 21st, it would be interesting to make a connection with a famous quatrain of Nostradamus (1503 - 1566): <i>"Les dieux feront aux humains apparence, Ce qu'ils seront autheurs de grand conflict : Auant Ciel veu serain espee et lance, Que vers main gauche sera plus grand afflict." </i></p><p>The best for us with this rather clear quatrain which number of quotation is I- XCI, is not to translate it, but to let your own free interpretation be. Just use your reptilian brain, without the filter of your neocortex : it will be much easier, and its meaning will appear clearly !</p><p> ******</p><p>Today, we are going to comment what happened over all France on Thursday, April 21st, 2022 from 10 PM. An important UFO manifestation occurred on all the country, and not just in Seine Maritime, Paris, Lyon, Alsace, Clermond-Ferrand, or Occitania (or even further in the principauty of Andorra). But the best picture has been taken in Lyon, where it looks clearly like a Blue Beam flying at an extremely high speed.</p><p>In our article untitled<i> "Just science-fiction LI : 2022, an astounding and marking year potentially celebrating Blue Beam !" </i>of January 20th, 2022, we were already announcing that event. And we can tell by now it has nothing to do with Space X and Elon Musk (born in 1971 in Pretoria, South Africa). Earthlings haven't got the power of Gods. They are just ordinary beings, and they don't possess the strange power of ZIM !</p><p>Of course, we don't want to diminish the great accomplishments of Elon Musk, as he often impresses us. But in those circumstances, he has nothing to do with what happened over all France. The strange Blue Beam observed is not either coming from the "Blue Beam project" of CIA and NSA. It is absolutely not an Earthling Blue Beam ! Don't forget the very High Tech Technology of America is directly deriving from the ET alliance of 1958 : the "Tau-9 Treaty" we already presented one year ago. Yet, this treaty doesn't include the power of ZIM ... personally owned by the Pleiadians who have always refused to sign it !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As we wrote it, if the Greys (J-rods A and J-rods B for the small ones, and Rigelians for the tall ones) signed the Tau-9 Treaty with America in 1958, among others hiding behind them, Pleiadians (often nicknamed "the Nordics") about them refused to do it. They judged human beings were not wise enough to use their highly developed technology !</p><p>Most ETs on Earth respect or try to respect the principle of non-interference on Earth history (or even geography). But it's not at all the case of Pleiadians. Don't forget they established the original dynasties of Egypt with Pharaohs, at the image of their own royal dynasty ! And they lasted very long...till now with the malediction of Tutankhamun, actually !</p><p>The Blue Beam seen over all France is indicating something probably happened involving a Pleiadian Prince and a bad Earthling (a provocation from the latter in Paris, the capital of France, more and more dirty and unpolite, most likely). With the Pleiadian dynasty the lèse-majesté has never been admitted since immemorial times ! The immediate response is usually affecting history and geography, as well as politics of course in the country concerned ! Now, Pleiadians are back to power on Earth !</p><p>Pleiadians respect a lot René Descartes (1596 - 1650), as he never denied their existence : he believed himself in ETs. And he wanted science to get rid of the tenebrous gangue of religion. That's why they can really mock at his fake heirs, the so-called "Cartesians", who are professing the opposite of his views nowadays without thinking, in fact ! And the ZIM power of the Pleiadian dynasty is a blue power of transformation, if we lift a bit the veil !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3097847128695198943.post-59853886601395605312022-03-21T02:54:00.001-07:002022-03-21T03:05:50.233-07:00Rediscovering famous characters VIII : "Souphis-Chembes" was a far too ordinary name for him in front of History !<p> by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D</p><p>___________________________</p><p>The man we are going to present today was primarily called "Souphis-Chembes". But his name was appearing to him as far too ordinary to face posterity : he wanted an immortal name to be able to mark History. You may think initially you have never heard about him at school...but you are wrong. Anyhow, it's not your fault because no teacher is never calling him under his name of origin usually.</p><p>When you will discover who is hiding behind this unknown name, you will be extremely amazed to realize you know him in fact, but under a totally different name, an "immortal" one dignous of his great pride ! So get ready to be formidably surprised to rediscover a so illustrious man of world History, from an unexpected angle and with puzzling questions !</p><p> *******</p><p>"Souphis-Chembes" is staying still nowadays a mysterious man : <i>he possessed the strange faculty to challenge the Past, the Present, and the Future, just like the "Neteru"</i> (the blue-skinned Wardens of the Sky) of ancient Egypt. He also challenged the Gods, like <i>Anubis</i> that him and his sons didn't respect much. <i>In Giza, Anubis' ears would have been shortened, and its face reshaped as a human one ! N</i>o one dared to change History as much as him, by rewriting it according to his incredible ambition. And till now, most archeologists wrote mainly what he wanted about himself ! Hence nobody really dared to study more accurately the biography of "Souphis-Chembes", as it should be from now on. Specialists are remaining essentially on the totally opposite views of two famous historians of Antiquity : the controversial Egyptian Manetho who wrote in Greek an History of Egypt <i>("Aegyptiaca"),</i> and the Greek Plutarch (who was on the same line as his predecessor Herodotus) ! </p><p>Manetho was a famous scribe who wrote an History of Egypt, by order of Pharaoh Ptolemeus I Soter (367 - 283 BC - cousin and successor of Alexander the Great, but most likely his half-brother). So then, if following Plutarch (circa 46 - circa 125 AD), this priest of God Serapis would have written his exceptional list of Pharaohs between the IVth and the IIIrd century BC. Manetho's name could have meant "Truth of Toth", among other translations. Until recently, his work was only admitted for human Pharaohs, but not for the metamorphic ones of the beginnings like Kings Scorpio, Djed or Aha ! In his famous "Aegyptiaca", "Souphis-Chembes" (IVth dynasty of Ancient Empire) as he called him was a human Pharaoh <i>who ascended to heaven during his lifetime, to reach and meet Râ (symbolized by the Sun) : so not at all after his death uncommonly ! </i>It's him who replaced the previously dominant cult of Ptah (polytheistic), by <i>the</i> <i>more monotheistic cult of Râ</i> (furtherly called Amon-Râ), <i>an alien and supreme God !</i> And "Souphis-Chembes" identified himself during his reign to the Sun-God, by introducing a new paradigm in Egyptian History...as well as<i> Theocracy with his writing of the holy books.</i> It has to be quoted that astonishingly during his reign, the statues of the alien God Râ as well as other divine statues were said to be able to march and talk, which looks totally impossible nowadays ! They were attributed also the more usual power to cure and make miracles !</p><p>For Plutarch, the Greeks, and the Macedonians (Ptolemeus' line was Macedonian), our mysterious character of the day was <i>a rather tyrannic Pharaoh. He was very imposing, clever, sometimes broad-minded, but full of himself, </i>just like human beings in power can be. For most modern egyptologists, he would have reigned between 2620 and 2580 BC approximatively. <i>But this poses a clear problem of inconsistency for the pyramid assigned to him, and officially built around 2560 BC : </i>20 years after his death then ! He was neither green like Osiris, nor blue like Djed (the Snake-Pharaoh). So up to now, you got to know that our character of the day is a famous Pharaoh. And yet, you have certainly never heard his original name. In fact, you only know him under his Greek name of Pharaoh Kheops, and associate him with the Great Pyramid by following Manetho - and may be too with the Sphinx of Giza. Kheops is in fact the way Herodotus (c. 484 - c. 425 BC), the famous Greek geographer and historian, was calling him. That's how he read and deciphered the hieroglyphs of "Khufu" !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>Nowadays, Pharaoh Kheops is more and more called "Khufu" ("the one who protects") or "Khnum Khufu" ("the one Khnum protects"), </i>as he is designed on the Great Pyramid, but never "Souphis-Chembes" like Manetho was calling him. Manetho didn't want to underline his totally human origin, unlike the first pharaohs...or Alexander ! Hence in his list of Pharaohs, Alexander the Great (356 - 323 BC), the first European Pharaoh of History, was at least as divine as him, as a descendant of Zeus-Ammon (Serapis) !</p><p><i>Re-calling Kheops "Souphis-Chembes", would raise the difficult and almost insoluble question of the construction of the Great Pyramid of Egypt...and the Sphinx of Giza as well. </i>As a matter of fact, more and more archeologists and researchers are doubting he ever built the Great Pyramid ! At best, he would have made erased previous Egyptian cartridges on this monument which seem to be far older than supposed, and substituted his own ones - during its restoration ! The topic of the reshaping of the Sphinx with a human face (his face, or the one of his son Kephren) instead of Anubis' one (a Jackal with sharp ears), is not clear-cut. But whatever the solution, this might have been the mark of a rather heretic Pharaoh !</p><p>Following that, Kheops would have been far more a "restorer" or even a "modulator", than a builder ! He would have reappropriated the past prestigious history of Egypt in connection with the legendary Atlantis, to transform his reign in a magnificent one ! <i>With such an attitude, he would in a way have become himself a "Big House" (meaning of the still misunderstood word of "Pharaoh") ! Kheops can appear then as the archetype of Pharaoh , as we still conceive it nowadays. </i>And he would have deeply marked the line of his father Snefru, and his sons Djedefre and Kephren !</p>GLOBAL POLITICS AND ECONOMICShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03482719694061769314noreply@blogger.com0