by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D
___________________________
Today we are going to make a transverse analysis between what is supposed about reincarnation, Buddha's clarification...and Roswell.
And as usually, this article has to be taken as a masterpiece of imagination of course : id est "Just science-fiction" !
******
Nowadays reincarnation has become a fashionable belief worldwide, including among Christians.
It is certainly due to the very strong imprint of the New Age movement : it is appearing as a vast and syncretic spiritual movement which started in the Sixties, and was influenced by "Theosophy" and "Gnosis".
Normally, the main point of Christianity is resurrection, not reincarnation.
With resurrection, the same person is rebirthing in the same body. The best known example is Jesus Christ.
With reincarnation, on the contrary, we are supposed to be reborn in a different body as a baby, after an undertermined period following death.
The main problem about reincarnation, is the deep amnesia we are suffering when we are reborn.
In that way, it can appear as a very illogical system.
As reincarnation is officially based upon the law of Karma (litteraly "action"), it is implying reward or punishment in connection with the good or bad actions of our past lives.
But the problem is everybody has to improve in this present life according to this law of retribution...without knowing what he or she did in another life.
And this paradoxical and uneasy process can last a very long time.
A very famous man made, circa the VIth or Vth century BC, a clarification about reincarnation : the married Prince Siddhartha Gautama from Nepal, better known under the name of Buddha ("the Awakened").
The most annoying with Karma is its very appearent unfairness, and its flock of sufferings said to be due to desires.
You are supposed to perfect yourself in a new life, when you ignore totally what you might have done in a previous life.
As a matter of fact, when you are reborn with a new "Vehicle" (your new body), you have normally completely forgotten your anterior life.
To be precise, this is not entirely true, as we are said to keep memory of our previous life till we become 2 years old.
The problem is that as a baby, nobody will listen to you, or understand your lisps.
And if you are in the rarest case - by remembering until 6 years old -, everybody will think your child imagination is too strong !
About this "amnesia" we have got every time we are reborn, Buddha made a determining clarification, and intended to bring beginnings of solution.
You can use special techniques (meditation, good food and drinks, tantras, mudras, sutras, mantras...) to find back the memory of who you were, and definitively free yourself from the wheel of reincarnations !
Hence, Buddha is very important for the noticeable mantra "OM MANI PADME HUM" ("the jewel of lotus").
The latter when repeated numerous times constantly, is said to give back memory about our previous life...and even our previous lives if recited quite a lot ! The only problem is not to stay locked around 2 years old (when you were a baby), in this present life !
The final way of Buddha is based upon Dharma ("what is sustaining"), not Karma ("action"... provoking a reaction, often interpreted as a punishment) !
Buddha's life is not always well known by some buddhists.
We remember an anecdote of the past, when a buddhist man asked us to teach him who was exactly Buddha ? We answered, it should be him to explain us who he was, and not us as we were not buddhist.
But he insisted, so we told him what we knew about him, by trying to be objective (non judgemental).
He didn't know he had more than 32 teeth (40 in fact !) and some other peculiarities - a very long tongue for instance - showing he was presdestined to be a charismatic spiritual leader.
Nowadays, there is a story about his left canine which would have escaped his incineration after his death. It is officially kept in the "Temple of the Tooth Relic" in Kandy (Sri Lanka).
Amazingly, such a tooth is symbolizing a way to directly access the "Library of our lost memories". But, it's not sure people take it this way.
As he smiled, we added that Buddha himself was sometimes a fun, by not taking himself too seriously, and accepting not to be perfect.
And we pointed out the striking moment he suddenly reached the final awakening, under his banian fig tree : someone just sat down close to him, and started to eat and drink as if he wasn't there, which was rather provocative as he was starving and so thirsty.
Buddha then said : "How hard it is not to eat when you are hungry, and how hard it is not to drink when you are thirsty !" And he stopped immediately his very long meditation of two years.
Obviously just after, he ate and drank a lot to catch back the lost time. With this small excess, he felt suddenly better and reviving. After that, good food and drinks, as well as a behavior spousing nature stayed always of special importance for him : that's why he is habitually represented smiling with a big tummy !
The fact he had predicted himself the final transmutation of his new path (for Now as it seems), with a new Buddha - not necessarily oriental - called "Milefo", is connecting him to something from beyond the Cosmos.
At this point, you may wonder what reincarnation and Buddha have got to do with Roswell ?
In July 1947, when there was the Roswell accident of flying saucers everybody has heard in New Mexico (USA), among the survivors there was of course a Zeta (the famous "J. Rod"), but also a female ET of another specie calling herself "Airl".
Her civilization she was naming "the Domain", appears wider than Andromeda.
Generally, we are taught she was injured and died sometimes after, with a controversial autopsy.
The big problem is that it seems it wasn't caused by the accident with "J.Rod", but by the electroshocks of bad scientists to make her speak at the end - about the secret technology of flying saucers.
When she was well treated at the beginning, she gave a lot of interesting informations by telepathy to the military nurse who was kindly looking after her.
But, when scientists started to interfere she refused to communicate anymore by warning humans : they should always be careful with cunning scientists and their scenarios to reach supreme power !
She told the military nurse human beings don't understand anything to their real origin, as well as their true history.
And the reason is connected to the deliberate amnesia, imposed upon them once they are reborn.
Earth in her presentation is just a "Jail Planet" to exile banished people.
Then the way reincarnation is usually introduced is completely wrong. And the question of personal improvement has never been the real point : the true point is to prevent people to remember...and escape !
Anyhow, if your only aim is to improve yourself, it's not a bad thing in itself. And you are welcome of course.
Yet to her, the reincarnation process is only linked to the survival of the remains of the "Ancient Empire" !
In that acception, she added that her coming on Earth was connected to her brothers and sisters stuck on Earth from this ancient time : the time of the "Annunaki" - "the Offsprings of (the God) Anu" coming from the Sky - in Sumer (presently Iraq).
In her message, she was counting on benevolent people of Earth to help her disclosing it.
She came on Earth as a pilot and an engineer, but also as a representative of her highly developped civilization...to bring a message of hope to the 3000 remainers of an "ET batallion" lost on Earth thousands of years ago. She knew they spread on all Earth since that time, which made complicated to find them back all.
She explained a lot about the kind of silicone composing her apparent skin and body, by quoting it was just an enveloppe or a practical "vehicle" she could leave anytime !
She said that, at the opposite of her, those 3000 super-intelligent creatures were stuck in their enveloppe because of the very strong Earthling "Force-Field".
They had stayed for too long on Earth. And that was why they had never been able to leave it, and to come back home. But she wanted to tell them they are neither abandoned, nor forgotten !
In conclusion, "Airl" unveiled the secret of those 3000 ETs connected to the old Annunaki of Sumer, who are stuck on Earth since that time, by being prisoners of their human enveloppe and the unescapable mechanism of reincarnation.
Her message is now making sense with the return of old Gods on our planet, after a so long time.
It might have secretly been made possible at the favor of the confining imposed willy-nilly on Earth presently, by avoiding human curiosity. The top arrival occurred on last April 29th, when some observers made a confusion between their huge Vessel and an enormous asteroid - which didn't hit Earth obviously. They might have used a "Rakshasa Generator of Phase Change", making them able to travel in the space at a speed reaching ten times the speed of light !
Airl was thus describing reincarnation as a prison of the mind and accessorily of the body. According to her, it has absolutely not the challenging aim to improve human beings through Karma, but on the contrary to emprison for ever people on Earth, considered as a "Jail Planet" (Hell). Sometimes, it is also true it can appear as a zoo for the tourism of ETs (Purgatory). So then, to her Earth is rarely a source of happiness, even it may happen occasionally (Paradise).
Hence, the potential coming back of old Annanuki's Gods on our planet could be a complex issue, for a New Phase of History : a new balance of presence and power would have to emerge with other important ET species and Earthlings.
She repeated the most important for human beings and her lost comrades, was to tear the veil of the deliberate amnesia imposed upon them once they are reborn.
Earth in her presentation was just initially an isolated planet to punish people called the "Divergents", who were used to exploit gold, copper and other important minerals. And sometimes, it was used to give entertainment for fun also.
Then, the way reincarnation is usually presented is wrong, and very partial.
And the question of personal improvement has never really been the main point : the true point is to prevent people to remember...and free over suddenly themselves !
You must remember your past lives to realize who you really are, before you can suddenly free from your mental jail...and possibly get out of your body to travel anywhere you want in the Cosmos !
In that way the concept of "Vehicle" (for the body) you can travel from, used by Buddha, was luminous.
And this is what Buddha, who was one of them according to "Airl", has clearly accomplished !
What is new now is that Rakshasas (the old Gods of the ancient Annunaki, sometimes considered to be behind the Mithraic religion too) have changed their mind about Earth.
It is important to quote that they are foes of Zetas - small Greys -, who are the most numerous group of ETs on our planet (around 50% of the total).
Thus, it could be important to keep the eyes on the Sky, rather empty at the moment, to watch any unusual movement.
Everyday people are heavily repeating on TV that tomorrow will be different from yesterday, after the world confining - as if it was almost a wish : they could happen to be right, but in a way they didn't expect after last March ("Mars" in French ) !
Friday, May 1, 2020
Thursday, April 2, 2020
Histoire uchronique VI : dans la Prison de la Conciergerie, une fleur peut en cacher une autre !
par Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Docteur en Géographie Economique, Ph. D
traduit et adapté de l'anglais et de l'italien par lui-même
__________________________
Après les versions anglaise et italienne de notre récit, respectivement publiées sur "Global Politics and Economics" les 30 août 2019 ("Uchronic history VI : in the Conciergerie Jail, a flower can hide another one ! ") et 1er novembre 2019 ("Storia u-Cronaca VI : nella Prigione della Conciergerie, un fiore puo' nasconderne un altro ! "), voici leur traduction et adaptation tant attendues en français.
*****
Durant la nuit du 1er au 2 août 1793, autour de quatre heures du matin, la Reine Marie-Antoinette fut transférée de la Prison du Temple à l'angoissante "Prison des Condamnés", la Conciergerie.
*****
Ce nouvel article pourrait vous émouvoir davantage que d'habitude, parce que nous allons révéler des détails-clés sur l'un des mystères les plus sensibles de l'Histoire.
Nous ne voulons pas vous bouleverser, mais cela peut arriver !
Comme il y a plusieurs parties dans notre article, vous pouvez faire une pause si vous vous sentez un peu sans dessus dessous.
C'est aujourd'hui - le vendredi 30 août 2019, NDLR - le 226ème anniversaire de l'évasion de la Reine Marie-Antoinette de la Prison de la Conciergerie à Paris : il s'agit d'un événement "seulement pour vos yeux" (resté top secret donc).
Il a impliqué non seulement le Baron de Batz qui fut accusé après coup d'avoir été son organisateur suprême, mais aussi plusieurs autres acteurs inattendus dans une situation très embrouillée et si périlleuse.
En prenant connaissance d'éléments-clés qui vont vous être révélés, vous serez en mesure de vous faire votre propre opinion, bien sûr.
Mais en premier lieu, préparez-vous à quelque chose que vous n'auriez absolument jamais imaginé s'être déroulé ainsi !
*****
Beaucoup de gens ont lu "Le Chevalier de Maison-Rouge", publié par Alexandre Dumas en 1846. Dans ce roman historique, après avoir échoué à sauver la Reine dans la Prison du Temple à Paris, il se cachait dans la "Maison Dixmer", et voulait encore une fois tenter de la sauver...
Le vrai nom de ce Chevalier, qui fut un acteur controversé de la Révolution Française, était Alexandre Gonsse de Rougeville (1761 - 1814). En fait, Dumas a changé le nom de "De Rougeville" en "De Maison Rouge", à sa requête personnelle.
Mais depuis le tout début, il y avait une confusion notable entre deux personnages historiques : cet homme, et le Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822).
Cette confusion vint probablement de l'opération de sauvetage de la Reine, à la Prison de la Conciergerie justement, qui impliqua comme organisateur parallèle notre chanceux Baron, parfois aussi appelé Jean-Pierre de Batz. Nous parlons bien sûr de l'imbroglio estampillé "Conspiration de l'Oeillet".
Dans cette nouvelle prison, la Reine fut complètement isolée, car ses enfants et sa belle-soeur Madame Elisabeth (1764 - 1794) étaient restés à la Prison du Temple, après la séparation effective du 2 août 1793.
La cellule actuelle montrée aux touristes à la prison de la Conciergerie n'est pas précisément la sienne, parce que la conformation des lieux a été complètement modifiée depuis lors.
Difficilement abritée derrière un paravent, la Reine était surveillée jour et nuit par deux gardes. Son seul mobilier était un fauteuil de canne, deux chaises, une simple table et un petit lit.
Une autre confusion venait du fait que, la soit-disant "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" ait été attribuée au Baron de Batz.
En réalité, l'idée originale est venue de façon surprenante du Comité de Salut Public, pour des raisons de haute politique.
En effet, c'était seulement un subterfuge visant à discréditer davantage la Reine avant sa mort planifiée, en utilisant le malchanceux et un peu naïf De Rougeville : il se démènerait en vain pour une illusion de sursaut.
Mais par dessus tout, c'était une façon d'en finir avec la légende de Sauveur du Baron de Batz, qui n'aurait pas la possibilité de faire quoi que ce soit !
Ce plan tortueux et cruel prévoyait de laisser d'abord De Rougeville approcher la Reine et lui proposer de s'évader, pour refermer le jeu sur elle au dernier moment !
En tant que Maître-Espion, le Baron de Batz qui était au courant du projet de De Rougeville, sentit que quelque chose n'allait pas la conception de son plan : il lui paraissait être à courte vue, et trop facile. Et il doit être ajouté aussi, qu'il se sentait personnellement défié !
Il savait que cet ancien "Chevalier du Poignard" était certainement un homme d'action, même s'il le considérait comme impressionnable et quelque peu imprévoyant.
Il pensait d'ailleurs que dans cette circonstance, il était vraisemblablement manœuvré par son compatriote d'Arras : Maximilien de Robespierre (1758 - 1794).
C'est pourquoi, il décida de piéger ce dernier ainsi que son Comité, dans leur fausse "Conspiration de l'Oeillet".
Après tout, cela lui fournissait l'opportunité inattendue qu'il recherchait pour sauver la Reine, avec un plan simple mais ingénieux : court-circuiter le Comité avec une intervention anticipée, en utilisant toutes les facilités artificiellement créées par ce même Comité pour le succès de sa contre-opération.
Simultanément, l'avantage pour lui était qu'il resterait fidèle à sa légende !
De Rougeville visita Marie-Antoinette le mercredi 28 août 1793, avec l'Inspecteur des Prisons et Chef de la Police Jean-Baptiste Michonis (1735 - 1794), qui était aussi membre de la Commune de Paris et limonadier. A cette occasion, De Rougeville laissa tomber au sol un tout petit message dissimulé derrière les deux œillets de sa boutonnière, où il lui proposait de s'évader.
Et c'est ainsi que très naturellement ces fleurs donnèrent leur nom à la "Conspiration", qui était en réalité déjà en train d'être piratée par le Baron de Batz. Mais, il n'apparaît pas que De Rougeville s'en soit rendu compte : il prenait le Baron de Batz pour un très riche banquier Royaliste essentiellement, et pas pour un maître d'œuvre. D'ailleurs, il pensait qu'il n'avait pas besoin de lui, car ses économies (400 Louis d'or et un grand nombre d'assignats) lui paraissaient suffisantes pour acheter les gardes.
Or, juste avant cette surprenante visite, la Reine Marie-Antoinette avait eu vent que De Batz préparait quelque chose : le changement d'attitude de ses deux gardes les plus proches et les paroles qu'ils avaient laissées s'échapper, montraient qu'il les avait tout simplement achetés parmi d'autres personnes, en cette période de disette. Et elle avait éperdument confiance dans le Baron.
C'est pourquoi, elle fit un signe discret d'acquiescement à De Rougeville lors de cette fameuse visite, pour lui montrer qu'elle acceptait de s'échapper, cette fois-ci.
Le même jour, l'un des gardes lui dit d'ailleurs de se préparer pour "la répétition de vendredi soir à 11 heures et demie".
"Le prochain vendredi soir" était le 30 août 1793, et non la nuit du lundi 2 au mardi 3 septembre 1793, planifiée par De Rougeville et Michonis durant leur nouvelle visite du même jour.
Elle était un peu déroutée, mais elle pensait que quelqu'un cherchait à garantir le succès de l'opération.
Quoi qu'il en soit, durant la nuit elle put passer tous les guichets sans incident... et même la sortie qui donnait sur la rue. Elle était si délicieusement surprise de pouvoir faire quelque pas dans la rue librement, dans l'obscurité !
Quand elle voulut retourner à l'intérieur à la fin de "la répétition", une femme cachée dans l'ombre la stoppa gentiment : elle lui souffla à l'oreille de s'en aller tranquillement en suivant son ami le Baron, qui était à côté d'elle .
Il allait être minuit. Et cette femme qui lui ressemblait beaucoup et était habillée comme elle, entra alors dans la Prison de la Conciergerie à sa place : c'était Cornélia (Cornélie) de Galéan, qui était prête à donner sa vie pour la Reine.
Le plan de génie de De Batz avait été de greffer sa propre intervention sur la fausse "Conspiration de l'œillet" du Comité, en utilisant intelligemment les facilités créées pour l'occasion. C'est pourquoi, il avait procédé à cette Substitution avec un Sosie, juste avant la mise en œuvre du projet de De Rougeville et de Michonis.
En même temps, il avait planifié de laisser De Rougeville essayer de sauver la fausse Reine, Cornélia de Galéan. Et s'il réussissait miraculeusement cette fois-ci, elle aussi pourrait finalement être rescapée, même si elle était prête à mourir à la place de la Reine.
De cette façon, elle ne serait restée que trois jours entiers à la Prison de la Conciergerie !
La nuit du lundi 2 au mardi 3 septembre 1793, De Rougeville et Michonis revinrent pour leur opération. Tout semblait se passer à merveille ; ils purent passer tous les guichets très facilement avec la prisonnière, jusqu'à la grille de la sortie. Elle donnait sur la "rue de la Barillerie", maintenant appelée "Boulevard du Palais" (depuis 1864)...et sur la Liberté.
Mais le garde changea soudainement d'avis et empêcha la fausse Reine de sortir.
De Rougeville et Michonis insistèrent pour qu'elle puisse sortir dans la rue selon leur plan, mais il refusa obstinément. Eux, ils pouvaient s'en aller ensemble, mais la "Citoyenne Capet" devait être ramenée à sa cellule !
De Rougeville pensa immédiatement qu'il n'avait pas donné assez d'argent au garde.
Quoi qu'il en soit, le fait est que De Rougeville et Michonis abandonnèrent !
Et le 3 septembre 1793, ce garde fit un rapport de l'incident à son supérieur, qui informa à son tour le Comité de Salut Public. La soit-disant "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" était amenée en pleine lumière, même si c'était une fausse, et le jeu semblait terminé.
C'est aussi la raison pour laquelle l'intervention de De Rougeville n'est pas proprement considérée comme une vraie par quelques historiens, qui doutent de sa réalité.
Ils peuvent, car s'il avait utilisé la force comme à son accoutumée, il aurait probablement pu sortir et s'enfuir avec la fausse Reine (donc pas la vraie Marie-Antoinette).
A sa décharge pour ce second échec, il semble qu'il ait été complètement cloué sur place par l'attitude autoritaire du garde, qui fut si soudaine et si définitive.
Pour conclure, le dernier garde avait fait semblant d'être acheté, selon le scénario mis en place. Et le Comité de Salut Public, après une rapide vérification, célébra l'échec de sa fausse "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" en riant à gorge déployée, totalement certain que la Reine ne s'était pas échappée de son mauvais tour !
Chose étrange, De Batz fut ensuite accusé d'avoir été son organisateur suprême, et donc ni le Comité évidemment, ni De Rougeville directement. Pourtant, Michonis, rapidement arrêté quant à lui comme complice, finira guillotiné le 17 juin 1794.
Et presque quarante jours après le soit-disant "échec" de cet embrouillamini, le 12 octobre 1793, la prisonnière fut interrogée sur sa "trahison" de la Nation et sur "son" fils, et on lui dit brutalement qu'elle serait jugée trois jours plus tard, le 15 octobre 1793.
Rapidement condamnée à mort, elle fut exécutée le 16 octobre 1793 à 12 heures 15 au lieu du matin. En effet, Robespierre, Maître du Comité, voulait éviter l'ennuyeuse mésaventure du 21 janvier 1793 à propos du Roi et de son Sauveur de dernière minute le long du "52 rue de Beauregard" à Paris, le Baron de Batz.
Pourtant à sa grande surprise, le Baron ne fit aucune apparition et il commença à se demander pourquoi, en craignant de façon soudaine d'avoir commis une énorme erreur !
Il avait tout à fait raison de penser ça, parce que Jean de Batz n'avait aucune raison d'intervenir pour sauver une Reine déjà sauvée !
La fausse "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" avait en fait été doublée très astucieusement par son opération anticipée de Déception : la "Contre-opération des deux Oeillets", où Robespierre et ses acolytes s'étaient faits complètement avoir !
En tant qu'épilogue uchronique, la seconde "Cornélia de Galéan, Marquise de Janson" (1755 - 1834), alias Marie-Antoinette mourut naturellement à 79 ans à Paris, alors que la Révolution était terminée, et que Robespierre et ses plus proches comparses avaient été guillotinés depuis longtemps !
L'Histoire peut vraiment être si ironique parfois !
Bien sûr, il vous appartient de penser et de repenser à cette "Black Op" du Baron de Batz, qui fut si étonnante. Mais souvenez-vous qu'un œillet blanc peut facilement cacher un autre œillet blanc, pour des raisons évidentes de succès, quand l'honneur et la renommée d'une légende vivante sont défiés !
"L'homme invisible" comme le surnommait Robespierre, avait encore frappé !
traduit et adapté de l'anglais et de l'italien par lui-même
__________________________
Après les versions anglaise et italienne de notre récit, respectivement publiées sur "Global Politics and Economics" les 30 août 2019 ("Uchronic history VI : in the Conciergerie Jail, a flower can hide another one ! ") et 1er novembre 2019 ("Storia u-Cronaca VI : nella Prigione della Conciergerie, un fiore puo' nasconderne un altro ! "), voici leur traduction et adaptation tant attendues en français.
*****
Durant la nuit du 1er au 2 août 1793, autour de quatre heures du matin, la Reine Marie-Antoinette fut transférée de la Prison du Temple à l'angoissante "Prison des Condamnés", la Conciergerie.
*****
Ce nouvel article pourrait vous émouvoir davantage que d'habitude, parce que nous allons révéler des détails-clés sur l'un des mystères les plus sensibles de l'Histoire.
Nous ne voulons pas vous bouleverser, mais cela peut arriver !
Comme il y a plusieurs parties dans notre article, vous pouvez faire une pause si vous vous sentez un peu sans dessus dessous.
C'est aujourd'hui - le vendredi 30 août 2019, NDLR - le 226ème anniversaire de l'évasion de la Reine Marie-Antoinette de la Prison de la Conciergerie à Paris : il s'agit d'un événement "seulement pour vos yeux" (resté top secret donc).
Il a impliqué non seulement le Baron de Batz qui fut accusé après coup d'avoir été son organisateur suprême, mais aussi plusieurs autres acteurs inattendus dans une situation très embrouillée et si périlleuse.
En prenant connaissance d'éléments-clés qui vont vous être révélés, vous serez en mesure de vous faire votre propre opinion, bien sûr.
Mais en premier lieu, préparez-vous à quelque chose que vous n'auriez absolument jamais imaginé s'être déroulé ainsi !
*****
Beaucoup de gens ont lu "Le Chevalier de Maison-Rouge", publié par Alexandre Dumas en 1846. Dans ce roman historique, après avoir échoué à sauver la Reine dans la Prison du Temple à Paris, il se cachait dans la "Maison Dixmer", et voulait encore une fois tenter de la sauver...
Le vrai nom de ce Chevalier, qui fut un acteur controversé de la Révolution Française, était Alexandre Gonsse de Rougeville (1761 - 1814). En fait, Dumas a changé le nom de "De Rougeville" en "De Maison Rouge", à sa requête personnelle.
Mais depuis le tout début, il y avait une confusion notable entre deux personnages historiques : cet homme, et le Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822).
Cette confusion vint probablement de l'opération de sauvetage de la Reine, à la Prison de la Conciergerie justement, qui impliqua comme organisateur parallèle notre chanceux Baron, parfois aussi appelé Jean-Pierre de Batz. Nous parlons bien sûr de l'imbroglio estampillé "Conspiration de l'Oeillet".
Dans cette nouvelle prison, la Reine fut complètement isolée, car ses enfants et sa belle-soeur Madame Elisabeth (1764 - 1794) étaient restés à la Prison du Temple, après la séparation effective du 2 août 1793.
La cellule actuelle montrée aux touristes à la prison de la Conciergerie n'est pas précisément la sienne, parce que la conformation des lieux a été complètement modifiée depuis lors.
Difficilement abritée derrière un paravent, la Reine était surveillée jour et nuit par deux gardes. Son seul mobilier était un fauteuil de canne, deux chaises, une simple table et un petit lit.
Une autre confusion venait du fait que, la soit-disant "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" ait été attribuée au Baron de Batz.
En réalité, l'idée originale est venue de façon surprenante du Comité de Salut Public, pour des raisons de haute politique.
En effet, c'était seulement un subterfuge visant à discréditer davantage la Reine avant sa mort planifiée, en utilisant le malchanceux et un peu naïf De Rougeville : il se démènerait en vain pour une illusion de sursaut.
Mais par dessus tout, c'était une façon d'en finir avec la légende de Sauveur du Baron de Batz, qui n'aurait pas la possibilité de faire quoi que ce soit !
Ce plan tortueux et cruel prévoyait de laisser d'abord De Rougeville approcher la Reine et lui proposer de s'évader, pour refermer le jeu sur elle au dernier moment !
En tant que Maître-Espion, le Baron de Batz qui était au courant du projet de De Rougeville, sentit que quelque chose n'allait pas la conception de son plan : il lui paraissait être à courte vue, et trop facile. Et il doit être ajouté aussi, qu'il se sentait personnellement défié !
Il savait que cet ancien "Chevalier du Poignard" était certainement un homme d'action, même s'il le considérait comme impressionnable et quelque peu imprévoyant.
Il pensait d'ailleurs que dans cette circonstance, il était vraisemblablement manœuvré par son compatriote d'Arras : Maximilien de Robespierre (1758 - 1794).
C'est pourquoi, il décida de piéger ce dernier ainsi que son Comité, dans leur fausse "Conspiration de l'Oeillet".
Après tout, cela lui fournissait l'opportunité inattendue qu'il recherchait pour sauver la Reine, avec un plan simple mais ingénieux : court-circuiter le Comité avec une intervention anticipée, en utilisant toutes les facilités artificiellement créées par ce même Comité pour le succès de sa contre-opération.
Simultanément, l'avantage pour lui était qu'il resterait fidèle à sa légende !
De Rougeville visita Marie-Antoinette le mercredi 28 août 1793, avec l'Inspecteur des Prisons et Chef de la Police Jean-Baptiste Michonis (1735 - 1794), qui était aussi membre de la Commune de Paris et limonadier. A cette occasion, De Rougeville laissa tomber au sol un tout petit message dissimulé derrière les deux œillets de sa boutonnière, où il lui proposait de s'évader.
Et c'est ainsi que très naturellement ces fleurs donnèrent leur nom à la "Conspiration", qui était en réalité déjà en train d'être piratée par le Baron de Batz. Mais, il n'apparaît pas que De Rougeville s'en soit rendu compte : il prenait le Baron de Batz pour un très riche banquier Royaliste essentiellement, et pas pour un maître d'œuvre. D'ailleurs, il pensait qu'il n'avait pas besoin de lui, car ses économies (400 Louis d'or et un grand nombre d'assignats) lui paraissaient suffisantes pour acheter les gardes.
Or, juste avant cette surprenante visite, la Reine Marie-Antoinette avait eu vent que De Batz préparait quelque chose : le changement d'attitude de ses deux gardes les plus proches et les paroles qu'ils avaient laissées s'échapper, montraient qu'il les avait tout simplement achetés parmi d'autres personnes, en cette période de disette. Et elle avait éperdument confiance dans le Baron.
C'est pourquoi, elle fit un signe discret d'acquiescement à De Rougeville lors de cette fameuse visite, pour lui montrer qu'elle acceptait de s'échapper, cette fois-ci.
Le même jour, l'un des gardes lui dit d'ailleurs de se préparer pour "la répétition de vendredi soir à 11 heures et demie".
"Le prochain vendredi soir" était le 30 août 1793, et non la nuit du lundi 2 au mardi 3 septembre 1793, planifiée par De Rougeville et Michonis durant leur nouvelle visite du même jour.
Elle était un peu déroutée, mais elle pensait que quelqu'un cherchait à garantir le succès de l'opération.
Quoi qu'il en soit, durant la nuit elle put passer tous les guichets sans incident... et même la sortie qui donnait sur la rue. Elle était si délicieusement surprise de pouvoir faire quelque pas dans la rue librement, dans l'obscurité !
Quand elle voulut retourner à l'intérieur à la fin de "la répétition", une femme cachée dans l'ombre la stoppa gentiment : elle lui souffla à l'oreille de s'en aller tranquillement en suivant son ami le Baron, qui était à côté d'elle .
Il allait être minuit. Et cette femme qui lui ressemblait beaucoup et était habillée comme elle, entra alors dans la Prison de la Conciergerie à sa place : c'était Cornélia (Cornélie) de Galéan, qui était prête à donner sa vie pour la Reine.
Le plan de génie de De Batz avait été de greffer sa propre intervention sur la fausse "Conspiration de l'œillet" du Comité, en utilisant intelligemment les facilités créées pour l'occasion. C'est pourquoi, il avait procédé à cette Substitution avec un Sosie, juste avant la mise en œuvre du projet de De Rougeville et de Michonis.
En même temps, il avait planifié de laisser De Rougeville essayer de sauver la fausse Reine, Cornélia de Galéan. Et s'il réussissait miraculeusement cette fois-ci, elle aussi pourrait finalement être rescapée, même si elle était prête à mourir à la place de la Reine.
De cette façon, elle ne serait restée que trois jours entiers à la Prison de la Conciergerie !
La nuit du lundi 2 au mardi 3 septembre 1793, De Rougeville et Michonis revinrent pour leur opération. Tout semblait se passer à merveille ; ils purent passer tous les guichets très facilement avec la prisonnière, jusqu'à la grille de la sortie. Elle donnait sur la "rue de la Barillerie", maintenant appelée "Boulevard du Palais" (depuis 1864)...et sur la Liberté.
Mais le garde changea soudainement d'avis et empêcha la fausse Reine de sortir.
De Rougeville et Michonis insistèrent pour qu'elle puisse sortir dans la rue selon leur plan, mais il refusa obstinément. Eux, ils pouvaient s'en aller ensemble, mais la "Citoyenne Capet" devait être ramenée à sa cellule !
De Rougeville pensa immédiatement qu'il n'avait pas donné assez d'argent au garde.
Quoi qu'il en soit, le fait est que De Rougeville et Michonis abandonnèrent !
Et le 3 septembre 1793, ce garde fit un rapport de l'incident à son supérieur, qui informa à son tour le Comité de Salut Public. La soit-disant "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" était amenée en pleine lumière, même si c'était une fausse, et le jeu semblait terminé.
C'est aussi la raison pour laquelle l'intervention de De Rougeville n'est pas proprement considérée comme une vraie par quelques historiens, qui doutent de sa réalité.
Ils peuvent, car s'il avait utilisé la force comme à son accoutumée, il aurait probablement pu sortir et s'enfuir avec la fausse Reine (donc pas la vraie Marie-Antoinette).
A sa décharge pour ce second échec, il semble qu'il ait été complètement cloué sur place par l'attitude autoritaire du garde, qui fut si soudaine et si définitive.
Pour conclure, le dernier garde avait fait semblant d'être acheté, selon le scénario mis en place. Et le Comité de Salut Public, après une rapide vérification, célébra l'échec de sa fausse "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" en riant à gorge déployée, totalement certain que la Reine ne s'était pas échappée de son mauvais tour !
Chose étrange, De Batz fut ensuite accusé d'avoir été son organisateur suprême, et donc ni le Comité évidemment, ni De Rougeville directement. Pourtant, Michonis, rapidement arrêté quant à lui comme complice, finira guillotiné le 17 juin 1794.
Et presque quarante jours après le soit-disant "échec" de cet embrouillamini, le 12 octobre 1793, la prisonnière fut interrogée sur sa "trahison" de la Nation et sur "son" fils, et on lui dit brutalement qu'elle serait jugée trois jours plus tard, le 15 octobre 1793.
Rapidement condamnée à mort, elle fut exécutée le 16 octobre 1793 à 12 heures 15 au lieu du matin. En effet, Robespierre, Maître du Comité, voulait éviter l'ennuyeuse mésaventure du 21 janvier 1793 à propos du Roi et de son Sauveur de dernière minute le long du "52 rue de Beauregard" à Paris, le Baron de Batz.
Pourtant à sa grande surprise, le Baron ne fit aucune apparition et il commença à se demander pourquoi, en craignant de façon soudaine d'avoir commis une énorme erreur !
Il avait tout à fait raison de penser ça, parce que Jean de Batz n'avait aucune raison d'intervenir pour sauver une Reine déjà sauvée !
La fausse "Conspiration de l'Oeillet" avait en fait été doublée très astucieusement par son opération anticipée de Déception : la "Contre-opération des deux Oeillets", où Robespierre et ses acolytes s'étaient faits complètement avoir !
En tant qu'épilogue uchronique, la seconde "Cornélia de Galéan, Marquise de Janson" (1755 - 1834), alias Marie-Antoinette mourut naturellement à 79 ans à Paris, alors que la Révolution était terminée, et que Robespierre et ses plus proches comparses avaient été guillotinés depuis longtemps !
L'Histoire peut vraiment être si ironique parfois !
Bien sûr, il vous appartient de penser et de repenser à cette "Black Op" du Baron de Batz, qui fut si étonnante. Mais souvenez-vous qu'un œillet blanc peut facilement cacher un autre œillet blanc, pour des raisons évidentes de succès, quand l'honneur et la renommée d'une légende vivante sont défiés !
"L'homme invisible" comme le surnommait Robespierre, avait encore frappé !
Tuesday, March 10, 2020
Just science-fiction XLI : beyond the Princely Pleiadian Revolution, the NESARA/GESARA, and Princess Pocahontas !
by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph.D
__________________________
This is a new article of our mascot series "Just science-fiction", dedicated to global economics and finance.
You may be totally surprised by our narration, which is also including a mysterious Pleiadian Prince, as well as Princess Pocahontas.
Anyhow get ready, and fasten your seatbelt !
Obviously, we wrote it in the form of "fantastic realism". That's why it has to be taken as in its generic title : id est "just science-fiction".
******
The Pleiadians are among the most important leaders of the Galactic Federation in our universe.
And they are officially representing it as prominent ET leaders on our planet, Earth, through their mysterious Prince : that's why we are talking today about their Princely present Revolution.
It has to be added they are intervening in human history periodically, by reorganizing the world, their world as well as ours. At the difference of most other groups of ETs, they don't like to stay neutral.
In 2016, they backed the election of the Republican Donald J. Trump to the US presidency, who won at the general surprise.
One month before (on October 3rd, 2016), we published an article on "Global Politics and Economics" about this election to come, untitled "Just Science-fiction XIV : Trump, the Pleiades' option and the message RIVATIVJ !".
He was actually elected just a few days after the GESARA (Global Economic Security And Reformation Act) was fully accepted by G20 in China, on November 1st, 2016.
The GESARA is the logic following of the NESARA of year 2000 in the USA : the NESARA is standing for the National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act.
With the NESARA, the USA are finally conquering their real independence from the Queen's Bank of England and the Bank of Vatican.
The NESARA can appear as the reactivation of the Executive Order n°11110 taken by President John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1917 - 1963), on June 4th, 1963. It was just several months before he died tragically in Dallas (Texas, USA), on November 22nd, 1963.
The idea of Kennedy was to put an end to the biased system of USA Inc. (created in 1871 after the end of the Secession War), and the one of FED (founded in 1913 on the Jekyll island, USA), which established a lasting dependence towards the Crown and the Vatican.
Actually, if the NESARA law was initiated by the Congress in the year 2000, it stayed unapplied till very recently. In fact it's only after the GESARA was accepted by all the countries registered in the UN in 2016, that President Donald J. Trump (born in 1946 in New York, USA) took the Executive Order n°5404 on March 22nd, 2018. So then he reinitiated the NESARA in its present shape. It seems he attaches great importance to honouring the memory of his predecessor, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who was a Democrat about him.
The creation of a new note called US Note (USN), based upon Gold and Assets in parallel with the fiduciary currency of the FED, is in fact revolutionary.
It is stopping the payment of interests on US Dollars notes emitted by the FED, which means the USA are now at last owners of their currency.
This huge reorganization of the "Planet Finance", was accompanied by the creation of a new reserve currency for whole Africa, the "Zim" (the new currency of Zimbabwe, ex-British Rhodesia).
This was the result of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act (ZIDERA) of 2001, amended in 2018, and signed by President Donald J. Trump.
Coincidentally or not, it has to be quoted that at the end of last year, France was lead to abandon the old system of "Franc CFA" for its ex-colonies of Africa.
As a result, the full enforcement of the NESARA/GESARA system is only dating back to January Ist, 2020, with its final touch : the VAT single rate (14%) created in the USA, to replace direct taxes by indirect taxes.
The GESARA would deserve a subsequent development, but let's say today that it has cancelled in its first clausus a huge part of the States' Debts (mortgages, other loans, and so on) !
This is benefitting not only America (the first Debtor in the world), but also the other States registered in UN !
All this is resulting of the Pleiadian initiative, which was finally followed by a final agreement with Alpha Dracos, another non-neutral group on Earth. As a matter of fact, the Galactic Federation decided to reset the Earth financial system, in order to make it healthier !
In that acception, the present BREXIT can appear as a way for the Crown to stabilize (or re-assess) its power in the world, over the 16 kingdoms it has sovereignty on, and obviously on the 53 states of Commonwealth (around 1/4 of all the States registered in the UN), and their counterparts.
It has to be quoted that Mozambique and Rwanda, which are not at all ex-British colonies, rejoined respectively in 1995 and 2009 "the Commonwealth of Nations" : it was created in 1931, and rebaptized this way without the word "British" in 1949 to help the transmutation of the ex-British Empire. Presently, this super-entity of 31 Million sq. km (for 2.4 Billion inhabitants) has still got four more countries on its waiting list : Madagascar, Yemen, Algeria, and Sudan.
India which has become the 4th Economic Power two years ago, is already an old member (since 1947, year of its independence) of this world organization, often misunderstood in France.
The aim of London is actually to stay the financial capital of the world, as it was until now, since the loss of Canada and India by the Kingdom of France (Treaty of Paris, 1763). Everything must change so then nothing changes.
Strangely in France, some people seem to ignore that Canada is a Kingdom, and not a Republic.
It is lead by a Prime Minister elected democratically of course, but the Head of State is Queen Elisabeth II (born in 1926 in London, UK).
Over there, she is represented by a Governor General, like in Australia and New Zealand, as well as in all her other overseas dominions (Statute of Westminster, 1931). And it has to added she is too the Head of Commonwealth.
In parallel of BREXIT (which stands for "Britain Exit" of the European Union), which happened last January 31st, and its aftermath of surprising negotiations, a vast agreement has to be made with America.
But, of course here, we are talking about the "New America", benefitting from the NESARA/GESARA system.
The commercial agreement planned between the Crown and the USA, is also a mean to keep alive some remains of the old Virginia Company and its specific maritime rules.
The Virginia Company was founded in 1606 in the honour of Queen Elisabeth I (1533 - 1603), equally called the "Virgin Queen". It established from May 13th, 1607, in the newly founded "Jamestown" (in "Virginia" then) : it was on the land of the father of the Indian Princess Pocahontas Matoaka (c. 1595 - 1617). She was a Powhatan and believed in "Kitchi Manitou" - the "Great Spirit" keeping the amazing secrets of Tobacco.
Hence, the Virginia Company greatly benefitted from the beautiful romance of this very sentimental woman with the British captain John Smith, she saved from death. And after various upheavals and conflicts in connection with the sudden and secret departure of John Smith for England, it lead to the definitive establishment of British immigrants in what became the USA.
Very strangely, people have never noticed that the Indians lead by Pocahontas' father (Wahunsunacock, also called "King Powhatan"), were said to be descendants of Pleiadians in their legends !
Coming back to the new global financial system, it has to be actuated again to work well.
As you can see, we are definitely in a very global perspective, where the Pleiadians through their Prince of Earth, are integrating (or reintegrating ?) our planet to the Galactic Federation.
The new American presidential election of the first Tuesday of November 2020 is then extremely important for the continuing of the vast changes introduced as quoted above.
If there was a grain of sand of any kind in the ongoing process, it is very likely that an economic and financial world crisis would occur.
It would almost certainly be worse than the ones of 1929 or 2008. And it could happen obviously in 2020, this year then, by acting as a reset.
We don't know if the "Great Spirit" of Princess Pocahontas is behind the biggest reorganization of America, England and the world since 1607 ? She died under the Christian name of Mrs Rebecca Rolfe, in Gravesend (Kent, England) in 1617 - probably of pneumonia -, when she wanted to return to Virginia and see again her Indian homeland.
The Powhatans were Virginia Algonquins. And it appears that Pocahontas' father was the "King" of all their confederacy.
It has to be underlined that the Powhatans were said to be able to master very strong divine forces, and to call the shots, by provoking heavy rain...as well as good weather !
But we must admit this world is really amazing and full of incredible events.
People intend to think world history as linear, when it's not at all.
Princess Pocahontas, now called the "Mother of the American Nation" wouldn't have denied that !
And it's clear that Pleiadians want to print again their mark on the destiny of America, and Earth as well : they have all the time of the world !
Amazingly, the story of Princess Pocahontas continued till nowadays. And an official genealogy has even been made to follow her descendance.
For instance, not many people in Europe know Edith Bolling Galt (1872 - 1961), who became the second wife of the famous US President Woodrow Wilson (1856 - 1924), was from the lineage of this very important Indian Princess. She was at his side when he negociated the Treaty of Versailles (June 28th, 1919), just after the end of the First World War !
__________________________
This is a new article of our mascot series "Just science-fiction", dedicated to global economics and finance.
You may be totally surprised by our narration, which is also including a mysterious Pleiadian Prince, as well as Princess Pocahontas.
Anyhow get ready, and fasten your seatbelt !
Obviously, we wrote it in the form of "fantastic realism". That's why it has to be taken as in its generic title : id est "just science-fiction".
******
The Pleiadians are among the most important leaders of the Galactic Federation in our universe.
And they are officially representing it as prominent ET leaders on our planet, Earth, through their mysterious Prince : that's why we are talking today about their Princely present Revolution.
It has to be added they are intervening in human history periodically, by reorganizing the world, their world as well as ours. At the difference of most other groups of ETs, they don't like to stay neutral.
In 2016, they backed the election of the Republican Donald J. Trump to the US presidency, who won at the general surprise.
One month before (on October 3rd, 2016), we published an article on "Global Politics and Economics" about this election to come, untitled "Just Science-fiction XIV : Trump, the Pleiades' option and the message RIVATIVJ !".
He was actually elected just a few days after the GESARA (Global Economic Security And Reformation Act) was fully accepted by G20 in China, on November 1st, 2016.
The GESARA is the logic following of the NESARA of year 2000 in the USA : the NESARA is standing for the National Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act.
With the NESARA, the USA are finally conquering their real independence from the Queen's Bank of England and the Bank of Vatican.
The NESARA can appear as the reactivation of the Executive Order n°11110 taken by President John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1917 - 1963), on June 4th, 1963. It was just several months before he died tragically in Dallas (Texas, USA), on November 22nd, 1963.
The idea of Kennedy was to put an end to the biased system of USA Inc. (created in 1871 after the end of the Secession War), and the one of FED (founded in 1913 on the Jekyll island, USA), which established a lasting dependence towards the Crown and the Vatican.
Actually, if the NESARA law was initiated by the Congress in the year 2000, it stayed unapplied till very recently. In fact it's only after the GESARA was accepted by all the countries registered in the UN in 2016, that President Donald J. Trump (born in 1946 in New York, USA) took the Executive Order n°5404 on March 22nd, 2018. So then he reinitiated the NESARA in its present shape. It seems he attaches great importance to honouring the memory of his predecessor, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who was a Democrat about him.
The creation of a new note called US Note (USN), based upon Gold and Assets in parallel with the fiduciary currency of the FED, is in fact revolutionary.
It is stopping the payment of interests on US Dollars notes emitted by the FED, which means the USA are now at last owners of their currency.
This huge reorganization of the "Planet Finance", was accompanied by the creation of a new reserve currency for whole Africa, the "Zim" (the new currency of Zimbabwe, ex-British Rhodesia).
This was the result of the Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act (ZIDERA) of 2001, amended in 2018, and signed by President Donald J. Trump.
Coincidentally or not, it has to be quoted that at the end of last year, France was lead to abandon the old system of "Franc CFA" for its ex-colonies of Africa.
As a result, the full enforcement of the NESARA/GESARA system is only dating back to January Ist, 2020, with its final touch : the VAT single rate (14%) created in the USA, to replace direct taxes by indirect taxes.
The GESARA would deserve a subsequent development, but let's say today that it has cancelled in its first clausus a huge part of the States' Debts (mortgages, other loans, and so on) !
This is benefitting not only America (the first Debtor in the world), but also the other States registered in UN !
All this is resulting of the Pleiadian initiative, which was finally followed by a final agreement with Alpha Dracos, another non-neutral group on Earth. As a matter of fact, the Galactic Federation decided to reset the Earth financial system, in order to make it healthier !
In that acception, the present BREXIT can appear as a way for the Crown to stabilize (or re-assess) its power in the world, over the 16 kingdoms it has sovereignty on, and obviously on the 53 states of Commonwealth (around 1/4 of all the States registered in the UN), and their counterparts.
It has to be quoted that Mozambique and Rwanda, which are not at all ex-British colonies, rejoined respectively in 1995 and 2009 "the Commonwealth of Nations" : it was created in 1931, and rebaptized this way without the word "British" in 1949 to help the transmutation of the ex-British Empire. Presently, this super-entity of 31 Million sq. km (for 2.4 Billion inhabitants) has still got four more countries on its waiting list : Madagascar, Yemen, Algeria, and Sudan.
India which has become the 4th Economic Power two years ago, is already an old member (since 1947, year of its independence) of this world organization, often misunderstood in France.
The aim of London is actually to stay the financial capital of the world, as it was until now, since the loss of Canada and India by the Kingdom of France (Treaty of Paris, 1763). Everything must change so then nothing changes.
Strangely in France, some people seem to ignore that Canada is a Kingdom, and not a Republic.
It is lead by a Prime Minister elected democratically of course, but the Head of State is Queen Elisabeth II (born in 1926 in London, UK).
Over there, she is represented by a Governor General, like in Australia and New Zealand, as well as in all her other overseas dominions (Statute of Westminster, 1931). And it has to added she is too the Head of Commonwealth.
In parallel of BREXIT (which stands for "Britain Exit" of the European Union), which happened last January 31st, and its aftermath of surprising negotiations, a vast agreement has to be made with America.
But, of course here, we are talking about the "New America", benefitting from the NESARA/GESARA system.
The commercial agreement planned between the Crown and the USA, is also a mean to keep alive some remains of the old Virginia Company and its specific maritime rules.
The Virginia Company was founded in 1606 in the honour of Queen Elisabeth I (1533 - 1603), equally called the "Virgin Queen". It established from May 13th, 1607, in the newly founded "Jamestown" (in "Virginia" then) : it was on the land of the father of the Indian Princess Pocahontas Matoaka (c. 1595 - 1617). She was a Powhatan and believed in "Kitchi Manitou" - the "Great Spirit" keeping the amazing secrets of Tobacco.
Hence, the Virginia Company greatly benefitted from the beautiful romance of this very sentimental woman with the British captain John Smith, she saved from death. And after various upheavals and conflicts in connection with the sudden and secret departure of John Smith for England, it lead to the definitive establishment of British immigrants in what became the USA.
Very strangely, people have never noticed that the Indians lead by Pocahontas' father (Wahunsunacock, also called "King Powhatan"), were said to be descendants of Pleiadians in their legends !
Coming back to the new global financial system, it has to be actuated again to work well.
As you can see, we are definitely in a very global perspective, where the Pleiadians through their Prince of Earth, are integrating (or reintegrating ?) our planet to the Galactic Federation.
The new American presidential election of the first Tuesday of November 2020 is then extremely important for the continuing of the vast changes introduced as quoted above.
If there was a grain of sand of any kind in the ongoing process, it is very likely that an economic and financial world crisis would occur.
It would almost certainly be worse than the ones of 1929 or 2008. And it could happen obviously in 2020, this year then, by acting as a reset.
We don't know if the "Great Spirit" of Princess Pocahontas is behind the biggest reorganization of America, England and the world since 1607 ? She died under the Christian name of Mrs Rebecca Rolfe, in Gravesend (Kent, England) in 1617 - probably of pneumonia -, when she wanted to return to Virginia and see again her Indian homeland.
The Powhatans were Virginia Algonquins. And it appears that Pocahontas' father was the "King" of all their confederacy.
It has to be underlined that the Powhatans were said to be able to master very strong divine forces, and to call the shots, by provoking heavy rain...as well as good weather !
But we must admit this world is really amazing and full of incredible events.
People intend to think world history as linear, when it's not at all.
Princess Pocahontas, now called the "Mother of the American Nation" wouldn't have denied that !
And it's clear that Pleiadians want to print again their mark on the destiny of America, and Earth as well : they have all the time of the world !
Amazingly, the story of Princess Pocahontas continued till nowadays. And an official genealogy has even been made to follow her descendance.
For instance, not many people in Europe know Edith Bolling Galt (1872 - 1961), who became the second wife of the famous US President Woodrow Wilson (1856 - 1924), was from the lineage of this very important Indian Princess. She was at his side when he negociated the Treaty of Versailles (June 28th, 1919), just after the end of the First World War !
Monday, March 2, 2020
Riscoprendo personaggi famosi VII : Maria e Claudia, o il felice de un dramma coniugale !
per Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Dottore in Geografia Economica, Ph. D
tradotto ed adattato dell'inglese all'italiano per se
____________________________
Ecco la traduzione del nostro articolo intitolato "Rediscovering famous characters VII : Maria and Claudia, or the happy end of a marital drama !", pubblicato Martedi` 17 Settembre 2019 su "Global Politics and Economics".
******
Oggi, dietro il titolo di questo articolo, puntiamo anche a parlare di un uomo molto famoso nel mondo.
Lo conoscete certamente, ma l'angolazione che abbiamo scelto per riscoprirlo vi sorprenderà !
Provate ad indovinare di chi stiamo parlando, scoprendo cose sorprendenti su quelle donne estremamente importanti sia per lui che per la Storia, Maria e Claudia !
E preparatevi per incredibili rivelazioni !
******
La storia inizia in Palestina, in un'epoca in cui era una provincia romana.
Un uomo innocente è stato condannato a morte alla maniera romana, per aver causato problemi all'ordine pubblico Romano.
Il problema per quello che doveva pronunciare questa pena, fu che era totalmente contro la morte per cuesto innocente.
Non lo considerava affatto un nemico di Roma, ma un uomo saggio. E ha fatto del suo meglio per evitare questa bruta fine.
In un attimo, penso` davvero che la scelta finale che diede al popolo lo avrebbe aiutato.
Ma no, le circonstanze avverse lo costrinsero nolens volens a pronunciare questa condanna fatale !
La sua bellissima moglie se stessa, Claudia Procula, intercetto` e cerco` di salvare questo "uomo giusto", ma non poté fare nulla. E quello fu l'inizio del suo dramma coniugale personale.
Due giorni dopo, quindi prima che l'uomo fosse giustiziato, Claudia si separo`da lui e lo lascio` bruscamente perché era molto arrabbiata.
Pensava che lei volesse tornare a Roma, come apparteneva alla famiglia imperiale, e poi a "Narbo Martius" (Narbona in Gallia Romana) dove nacque.
Il centurione che doveva dirigere l'esecuzione pubblica venne a vederlo, e disse che ovviamente le gambe di quest'uomo si sarebbero rotte come di solito in questo caso.
Ma il Grande Romano di qui stiamo parlando, gli ha assolutamente proibito di farlo.
Questa storia infelice ha già causato abbastanza danni nella sua vita privata.
Non voleva ferire di più sua moglie, se un giorno una riconcilazione fosse possibile.
Sapeva che sua moglie era stata estremamente colpita da quest'uomo innocente, lei vedeva come una personalità luminosa - proprio come lui tra l'altro.
E sapeva che Claudia era diventata molto amichevole con la moglie di questo saggio, Maria, una bellissima donna anche.
Voleva saperne di più su di loro, le loro credenze rinfrescanti, e anche le loro precedente stile di vita.
Indovinate che e il nostro personaggio del giorno, in questa fase ? Non ancora probabilmente, ma si sente che sta arrivando !
Dopo la morte di questo innocente, accade qualcosa di estremamente insolito. Girava subito voce che quest'uomo fosse riapparso vivo e senza alcuna lesione sul corpo (piedi, mani, fianchi), a sua moglie Maria prima. Questo evento fu del tutto inaspettato !
Il Grande Romano ha avuto modo di conoscere queste notizie molto rapidemente, e i suoi vicini gli hanno conciliato di aiutarli a spegnerle.
Ma fece esattamente il contrario con la segreta speranza che la donna che amava le perdonasse e tornasse da lui, se lei stesse imparando la "buona notizia".
Era improvvisamente felice e tremante di gioia. Eppure, Claudia non è tornata e si sentiva davvero triste e depresso.
Sullo sfondo, riusci` finalmente a capire che stava confortando Maria, e voleva aiurtarla a lasciare la Giudea per un rifugio più sicuro. Ed è lei che ha suggerito alla sua nuova amica di rifugiarsi nella Gallia Narbonesa, la sua regione natale (fondata nel 118 aC come la più antica colonia Romana).
Maria conobbe infatti delle difficoltà inaspettate con un certo Simone, che era un precedente amico del marito.
Voleva prendere la sua successione, e stava negando questo ruolo a suo cognato Giacobbe, e ovviamente a lei come lei era una donna.
Giacobbe fu assessinato (da un certo Saul). Maria si sentiva più che mai in pericolo di vita, e stava diventando urgente andarsene.
Invece di impedire a Maria di andare, il Grande Romano, nella speranza duratura di recuperare un giorno la sua moglie Claudia, creo`per le sue discrete agevolazioni per emigrare nella Gallia Narbonesa.
E allo stesso tempo, temendo che le succedesse qualcosa di brutto, la protesse nell'ombra con le sue spie.
Maria riusci`finalmente a prendere una barca romana. Pensava che questo fosse dovuto all'unico aiuto di Claudia, ma durante il viaggio a la Gallia Narbonesa, si rese conto che anche suo marito era coinvolto nel suo salvataggio : lei ricevette indirettamente da lui una seconda borsa per le sue spese extra.
Dopo essere atterrata in Gallia Narbonesa, Claudia lei si rallegrava.
Hanno parlato per molto tempo insieme, e Maria le ha chiesto di perdonare suo marito, che non era un uomo cattivo. Claudia pianse allora sulla sua felicità coniugale passata.
Maria ha agiunto che se sue marito è stato costretto da circostanze avverse a fare un difetto, aveva fatto tutto per ripararlo : lei protrebbe testimoniare su di esso. E comunque il suo innocente sposo era di nuovo vivo, cosi`lei stessa lo aveva già perdonato.
Quindi il suo desiderio più profondo era che si reconciliassero e tornassero insieme.
Claudia era comossa nel cuore dalle sue parole pacificanti.
E si sentiva stressata perché il suo amato marito non era accanto a lei.
Ma inaspettatamente gli eventi hanno aiutato Maria a esaudire il suo desiderio intimo.
Mentre i problemi politici si verificavano in Giudea, il marito di Claudia che non poteva fermarli, fu richiamato a Roma...e esiliato a la "Gallia Narbonesa".
Stranamente un sacco di storici attrezzo che come una grande sconfitta per lui...quando fini`per esserre al contrario la sua più grande vittoria nella vita ! La rizurrezione di Gesù definitivamente sposato (San Giovanni, III - 29), aveva provocato alla fine un miracolo totalmente inatteso : la riconciliazione appassionata del nostro carattere misterioso del giorno con sua moglie Claudia.
Dopo aver languito, sono stati riuniti per il bene in totale felicità !
Come epilogo, a causa del felice accidente di questo esilio, il nostro Grande Romano Ponzio Pilato, ex prefetto della Giudea, poté finalmente rivedere la sua amata moglie Claudia Procula, che lo aveva perdonato !
Di conseguenza è diventato uno dei primi "cristiani" come sua moglie, secondo fonti cristiane orientali !
Ecco ora hai il suo nome, ma nuoi abbiamo l'intuizione che avetate già indovinato chi era il nostro misterioso personaggio del giorno : "Ponce Pilate" in French !
Non sapevi solo chi era Claudia Procula, e non hai mai immaginato che questa Principessa Romana fosse una cristiana precoce, in quello che è attualmente il Sud della Francia !
E l'altra donna molto importante chiamata Maria, che acclamo` a questa riconciliazione era Maria Magdalena, compagna di Gesù Cristo : effetivamente attraco` nelle Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, e mori` a La Sainte Baume vicino Massilia (Marsiglia) anni dopo !
La Cristianita ha spesso intrapreso strade inaspettate per vivere finalmente l'ascensione a Roma, e in tutto il mondo. I suoi inizi sono pieni di dettagli sorprendenti, che la maggior parte dei credenti stanno ancora ignorando al giorno d'oggi, due millenari dopo !
La Chiesa Copta d'Egitto, come quella Etiopie celebrano effetivamente la "coppia Pilatus" ogni 25 Giugno, come santi Cristiani, che sembra essere quasi totalmente ignorato in Occidente.
Ma anche San Paolo (in precedenza chiamato Saul di Tarso), che non ha mai mostrato alcuna simpatia per Maria Magdalena, ha riconosciuto nei suoi scritti il ruolo svolto fin dall'inizio da grandi Donne Romane come Claudia - cosi` la chiamava lui !
tradotto ed adattato dell'inglese all'italiano per se
____________________________
Ecco la traduzione del nostro articolo intitolato "Rediscovering famous characters VII : Maria and Claudia, or the happy end of a marital drama !", pubblicato Martedi` 17 Settembre 2019 su "Global Politics and Economics".
******
Oggi, dietro il titolo di questo articolo, puntiamo anche a parlare di un uomo molto famoso nel mondo.
Lo conoscete certamente, ma l'angolazione che abbiamo scelto per riscoprirlo vi sorprenderà !
Provate ad indovinare di chi stiamo parlando, scoprendo cose sorprendenti su quelle donne estremamente importanti sia per lui che per la Storia, Maria e Claudia !
E preparatevi per incredibili rivelazioni !
******
La storia inizia in Palestina, in un'epoca in cui era una provincia romana.
Un uomo innocente è stato condannato a morte alla maniera romana, per aver causato problemi all'ordine pubblico Romano.
Il problema per quello che doveva pronunciare questa pena, fu che era totalmente contro la morte per cuesto innocente.
Non lo considerava affatto un nemico di Roma, ma un uomo saggio. E ha fatto del suo meglio per evitare questa bruta fine.
In un attimo, penso` davvero che la scelta finale che diede al popolo lo avrebbe aiutato.
Ma no, le circonstanze avverse lo costrinsero nolens volens a pronunciare questa condanna fatale !
La sua bellissima moglie se stessa, Claudia Procula, intercetto` e cerco` di salvare questo "uomo giusto", ma non poté fare nulla. E quello fu l'inizio del suo dramma coniugale personale.
Due giorni dopo, quindi prima che l'uomo fosse giustiziato, Claudia si separo`da lui e lo lascio` bruscamente perché era molto arrabbiata.
Pensava che lei volesse tornare a Roma, come apparteneva alla famiglia imperiale, e poi a "Narbo Martius" (Narbona in Gallia Romana) dove nacque.
Il centurione che doveva dirigere l'esecuzione pubblica venne a vederlo, e disse che ovviamente le gambe di quest'uomo si sarebbero rotte come di solito in questo caso.
Ma il Grande Romano di qui stiamo parlando, gli ha assolutamente proibito di farlo.
Questa storia infelice ha già causato abbastanza danni nella sua vita privata.
Non voleva ferire di più sua moglie, se un giorno una riconcilazione fosse possibile.
Sapeva che sua moglie era stata estremamente colpita da quest'uomo innocente, lei vedeva come una personalità luminosa - proprio come lui tra l'altro.
E sapeva che Claudia era diventata molto amichevole con la moglie di questo saggio, Maria, una bellissima donna anche.
Voleva saperne di più su di loro, le loro credenze rinfrescanti, e anche le loro precedente stile di vita.
Indovinate che e il nostro personaggio del giorno, in questa fase ? Non ancora probabilmente, ma si sente che sta arrivando !
Dopo la morte di questo innocente, accade qualcosa di estremamente insolito. Girava subito voce che quest'uomo fosse riapparso vivo e senza alcuna lesione sul corpo (piedi, mani, fianchi), a sua moglie Maria prima. Questo evento fu del tutto inaspettato !
Il Grande Romano ha avuto modo di conoscere queste notizie molto rapidemente, e i suoi vicini gli hanno conciliato di aiutarli a spegnerle.
Ma fece esattamente il contrario con la segreta speranza che la donna che amava le perdonasse e tornasse da lui, se lei stesse imparando la "buona notizia".
Era improvvisamente felice e tremante di gioia. Eppure, Claudia non è tornata e si sentiva davvero triste e depresso.
Sullo sfondo, riusci` finalmente a capire che stava confortando Maria, e voleva aiurtarla a lasciare la Giudea per un rifugio più sicuro. Ed è lei che ha suggerito alla sua nuova amica di rifugiarsi nella Gallia Narbonesa, la sua regione natale (fondata nel 118 aC come la più antica colonia Romana).
Maria conobbe infatti delle difficoltà inaspettate con un certo Simone, che era un precedente amico del marito.
Voleva prendere la sua successione, e stava negando questo ruolo a suo cognato Giacobbe, e ovviamente a lei come lei era una donna.
Giacobbe fu assessinato (da un certo Saul). Maria si sentiva più che mai in pericolo di vita, e stava diventando urgente andarsene.
Invece di impedire a Maria di andare, il Grande Romano, nella speranza duratura di recuperare un giorno la sua moglie Claudia, creo`per le sue discrete agevolazioni per emigrare nella Gallia Narbonesa.
E allo stesso tempo, temendo che le succedesse qualcosa di brutto, la protesse nell'ombra con le sue spie.
Maria riusci`finalmente a prendere una barca romana. Pensava che questo fosse dovuto all'unico aiuto di Claudia, ma durante il viaggio a la Gallia Narbonesa, si rese conto che anche suo marito era coinvolto nel suo salvataggio : lei ricevette indirettamente da lui una seconda borsa per le sue spese extra.
Dopo essere atterrata in Gallia Narbonesa, Claudia lei si rallegrava.
Hanno parlato per molto tempo insieme, e Maria le ha chiesto di perdonare suo marito, che non era un uomo cattivo. Claudia pianse allora sulla sua felicità coniugale passata.
Maria ha agiunto che se sue marito è stato costretto da circostanze avverse a fare un difetto, aveva fatto tutto per ripararlo : lei protrebbe testimoniare su di esso. E comunque il suo innocente sposo era di nuovo vivo, cosi`lei stessa lo aveva già perdonato.
Quindi il suo desiderio più profondo era che si reconciliassero e tornassero insieme.
Claudia era comossa nel cuore dalle sue parole pacificanti.
E si sentiva stressata perché il suo amato marito non era accanto a lei.
Ma inaspettatamente gli eventi hanno aiutato Maria a esaudire il suo desiderio intimo.
Mentre i problemi politici si verificavano in Giudea, il marito di Claudia che non poteva fermarli, fu richiamato a Roma...e esiliato a la "Gallia Narbonesa".
Stranamente un sacco di storici attrezzo che come una grande sconfitta per lui...quando fini`per esserre al contrario la sua più grande vittoria nella vita ! La rizurrezione di Gesù definitivamente sposato (San Giovanni, III - 29), aveva provocato alla fine un miracolo totalmente inatteso : la riconciliazione appassionata del nostro carattere misterioso del giorno con sua moglie Claudia.
Dopo aver languito, sono stati riuniti per il bene in totale felicità !
Come epilogo, a causa del felice accidente di questo esilio, il nostro Grande Romano Ponzio Pilato, ex prefetto della Giudea, poté finalmente rivedere la sua amata moglie Claudia Procula, che lo aveva perdonato !
Di conseguenza è diventato uno dei primi "cristiani" come sua moglie, secondo fonti cristiane orientali !
Ecco ora hai il suo nome, ma nuoi abbiamo l'intuizione che avetate già indovinato chi era il nostro misterioso personaggio del giorno : "Ponce Pilate" in French !
Non sapevi solo chi era Claudia Procula, e non hai mai immaginato che questa Principessa Romana fosse una cristiana precoce, in quello che è attualmente il Sud della Francia !
E l'altra donna molto importante chiamata Maria, che acclamo` a questa riconciliazione era Maria Magdalena, compagna di Gesù Cristo : effetivamente attraco` nelle Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, e mori` a La Sainte Baume vicino Massilia (Marsiglia) anni dopo !
La Cristianita ha spesso intrapreso strade inaspettate per vivere finalmente l'ascensione a Roma, e in tutto il mondo. I suoi inizi sono pieni di dettagli sorprendenti, che la maggior parte dei credenti stanno ancora ignorando al giorno d'oggi, due millenari dopo !
La Chiesa Copta d'Egitto, come quella Etiopie celebrano effetivamente la "coppia Pilatus" ogni 25 Giugno, come santi Cristiani, che sembra essere quasi totalmente ignorato in Occidente.
Ma anche San Paolo (in precedenza chiamato Saul di Tarso), che non ha mai mostrato alcuna simpatia per Maria Magdalena, ha riconosciuto nei suoi scritti il ruolo svolto fin dall'inizio da grandi Donne Romane come Claudia - cosi` la chiamava lui !
Tuesday, February 4, 2020
Rediscovering famous characters VIII : the hypothesis of Martin Luther about "A" !
by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph D.
___________________________
Today, we are going to help you rediscovering a troubling famous man, who was living in the Ist century AD : we will just call him "A" to start.
He was almost contemporary of Jesus Christ, and quite certainly of Saul of Tarsus (now called Saint Paul). He is said to have met the latter when he studied in Tarsus.
His personality and his life had many common points with the ones of Jesus. And a few searchers even thought it could have been him, not without some ulterior motives usually.
But generally, people stopped the identification on someone else, Saint Paul precisely, who had been attributed the writing of various "Epistles" ("Letters") in ancient Greek of the New Testament.
And that was the case of Martin Luther (1483 - 1546), the great Reformer of Christianity during the Renaissance time.
Martin Luther was first a Catholic monk in quest of truth and purity - an Augustinian monk in Erfurt (Thuringia, Germany). In 1520, he became the Protestant leader we know, when he burnt the Papal Bull threatening him to be excommunicated if he didn't retract his "95 thesis" of 1517.
As a flasback, in 1505 - when a teenager- , a curious event happened to him : a lightning fell right next to him during a powerful storm. He was neither touched nor injured, but as he could have been struck down, he felt a very strong emotion. And he was never able to forget what happened.
Here lies the link he established with Saint Paul, and may be also the connection some people could establish between him and Saint Paul - the refounder of Christianity.
As a matter of fact, the latter which original name according to his hagiography was Saul of Tarsus, is said to have been stricken by a lightning : "the lightning of Jesus Christ", on the way of Damas. And the official story taught us he totally changed his life and reversed his beliefs, after having stayed blind for three days. He was transfigurated !
Generally, what is studied about Luther is the genesis of Protestantism, with his numerous criticisms about the Church of his time and the power of Popes : his "95 thesis" placarded on the door of the Church of Wittenberg in Saxony, on Saturday, October 31st, 1517 precisely.
That's why people intend to forget the very original identification he made between the one he took as the real author of most "Epistles", and our character of the day.
He didn't deny Saul of Tarsus dramatically changed after the accident of the lightning on the way of Damas. But, by studying and identifying the style of most Epistles in the New Testament, he saw some appearent differences. And, as an exegete, those ones lead him to think, that Saul of Tarsus couldn't have written all of what he was attributed. Beside the observable variations in style, he thought this man coming from Cilicia, who was first a denunciator of Christians to the Romans, wasn't qualified and cultured enough to have written most of them. And by investigating who was at that time, he became convinced it was our mysterious "A", whom life and knowledge were partly similar to those of Jesus Christ.
Luther recognized the passion and the energy Saul of Tarsus (aka "Paulus", the "Small") put in the development of Christianity.
But at the same time, he made the hypothesis that there was another "Paul", in parallel with Saul.
And the other one, was according to him, a famous wise man in the Antiquity with miraculous powers. His personality was luminous. From Greek origin, his name was just shortened in "Pol", which could explain the quiproquo.
We guess, at this stage you don't know yet whom we are talking about. So, let's give more details about him !
The other "Pol", which speech can often look similar to the one of Jesus Christ, is appearing nowadays to have been born in the beginning of the Ist century AD in Cappadocia, and to have died in Ephesus around 97 or 98 AD.
Like the Christ he had apostles (the "Caduceus Carriers"), at the number of 7 about him, and a friend called Damis. Coincidentaly, Saint Paul had a friend called "Demas", which is rather proximate as a name.
Hence if we follow this logic, "Pol" was a contraction of "Appolonios" (from Apollo's name). And if we add he was precisely born in Tyana, you got it : you now know we are talking about Appolonios of Tyana !
This man was able to read in the thoughts of people and to prophesy.
To conclude about Appolonios of Tyana, we must say he was certainly a suprising man.
Usually, he is presented as a neopythagorician and a Magus with strange and incredible powers (resurrection of the dead, clairvoyance, bilocation...).
Various Roman emperors revered him, except Domitian (81- 96 AD). Noticeably, he could never forgive anything to the latter, an attitude which is then quite different from the forgiveness preached by Jesus Christ.
And he stayed famous in all the Roman Empire, for more than two centuries after his death.
Apollonios of Tyana was born in a rich family, and he didn't have difficulties to travel far and stay at good places.
With his friend Damis, they visited India where they could attend levitation sessions, and even try themselves.
It is also said that they were invited in a normally inaccessible kingdom of deep Asia, where they were served meals by automats (robots then)... and this almost two thousand years ago !
He had an opened conflict with the Roman Emperor Domitian quoted above, and was tried as an enemy of Rome for this reason.
But something amazing happened at the beginning of the trial. When the act of accusation had to be read in the court, all the charges retained against him spectacularly disappeared from the tablet of the scribe. He was then acquitted and released, which was again far different from Jesus' destiny. And this miraculous event increased enormously his fame and aura !
It is obvious that if we admit such an identification of Appolonios of Tyana with "Pol" (for Paul), we have also to admit Christianism has been from the right beginning a vast synthesis between several similar or very proximate religious currents.
It is not really impossible, as we know already there was a strong influence of Mithraïsm for instance, so why not a discrete influence of Apollonios of Tyana too ?
Following the same logic, the historicity of Jesus himself, sometimes doubted nowadays, would derive more in fact from his Partner in life, Maria-Magdalena, and the spouses Pilatus (Pontius Pilatus and his beloved wife, the Roman princess Claudia Procula), rather than only from the four traditional Evangelists.
And the same goes for his Resurrection and his recognized Divinity !
___________________________
Today, we are going to help you rediscovering a troubling famous man, who was living in the Ist century AD : we will just call him "A" to start.
He was almost contemporary of Jesus Christ, and quite certainly of Saul of Tarsus (now called Saint Paul). He is said to have met the latter when he studied in Tarsus.
His personality and his life had many common points with the ones of Jesus. And a few searchers even thought it could have been him, not without some ulterior motives usually.
But generally, people stopped the identification on someone else, Saint Paul precisely, who had been attributed the writing of various "Epistles" ("Letters") in ancient Greek of the New Testament.
And that was the case of Martin Luther (1483 - 1546), the great Reformer of Christianity during the Renaissance time.
Martin Luther was first a Catholic monk in quest of truth and purity - an Augustinian monk in Erfurt (Thuringia, Germany). In 1520, he became the Protestant leader we know, when he burnt the Papal Bull threatening him to be excommunicated if he didn't retract his "95 thesis" of 1517.
As a flasback, in 1505 - when a teenager- , a curious event happened to him : a lightning fell right next to him during a powerful storm. He was neither touched nor injured, but as he could have been struck down, he felt a very strong emotion. And he was never able to forget what happened.
Here lies the link he established with Saint Paul, and may be also the connection some people could establish between him and Saint Paul - the refounder of Christianity.
As a matter of fact, the latter which original name according to his hagiography was Saul of Tarsus, is said to have been stricken by a lightning : "the lightning of Jesus Christ", on the way of Damas. And the official story taught us he totally changed his life and reversed his beliefs, after having stayed blind for three days. He was transfigurated !
Generally, what is studied about Luther is the genesis of Protestantism, with his numerous criticisms about the Church of his time and the power of Popes : his "95 thesis" placarded on the door of the Church of Wittenberg in Saxony, on Saturday, October 31st, 1517 precisely.
That's why people intend to forget the very original identification he made between the one he took as the real author of most "Epistles", and our character of the day.
He didn't deny Saul of Tarsus dramatically changed after the accident of the lightning on the way of Damas. But, by studying and identifying the style of most Epistles in the New Testament, he saw some appearent differences. And, as an exegete, those ones lead him to think, that Saul of Tarsus couldn't have written all of what he was attributed. Beside the observable variations in style, he thought this man coming from Cilicia, who was first a denunciator of Christians to the Romans, wasn't qualified and cultured enough to have written most of them. And by investigating who was at that time, he became convinced it was our mysterious "A", whom life and knowledge were partly similar to those of Jesus Christ.
Luther recognized the passion and the energy Saul of Tarsus (aka "Paulus", the "Small") put in the development of Christianity.
But at the same time, he made the hypothesis that there was another "Paul", in parallel with Saul.
And the other one, was according to him, a famous wise man in the Antiquity with miraculous powers. His personality was luminous. From Greek origin, his name was just shortened in "Pol", which could explain the quiproquo.
We guess, at this stage you don't know yet whom we are talking about. So, let's give more details about him !
The other "Pol", which speech can often look similar to the one of Jesus Christ, is appearing nowadays to have been born in the beginning of the Ist century AD in Cappadocia, and to have died in Ephesus around 97 or 98 AD.
Like the Christ he had apostles (the "Caduceus Carriers"), at the number of 7 about him, and a friend called Damis. Coincidentaly, Saint Paul had a friend called "Demas", which is rather proximate as a name.
Hence if we follow this logic, "Pol" was a contraction of "Appolonios" (from Apollo's name). And if we add he was precisely born in Tyana, you got it : you now know we are talking about Appolonios of Tyana !
This man was able to read in the thoughts of people and to prophesy.
To conclude about Appolonios of Tyana, we must say he was certainly a suprising man.
Usually, he is presented as a neopythagorician and a Magus with strange and incredible powers (resurrection of the dead, clairvoyance, bilocation...).
Various Roman emperors revered him, except Domitian (81- 96 AD). Noticeably, he could never forgive anything to the latter, an attitude which is then quite different from the forgiveness preached by Jesus Christ.
And he stayed famous in all the Roman Empire, for more than two centuries after his death.
Apollonios of Tyana was born in a rich family, and he didn't have difficulties to travel far and stay at good places.
With his friend Damis, they visited India where they could attend levitation sessions, and even try themselves.
It is also said that they were invited in a normally inaccessible kingdom of deep Asia, where they were served meals by automats (robots then)... and this almost two thousand years ago !
He had an opened conflict with the Roman Emperor Domitian quoted above, and was tried as an enemy of Rome for this reason.
But something amazing happened at the beginning of the trial. When the act of accusation had to be read in the court, all the charges retained against him spectacularly disappeared from the tablet of the scribe. He was then acquitted and released, which was again far different from Jesus' destiny. And this miraculous event increased enormously his fame and aura !
It is obvious that if we admit such an identification of Appolonios of Tyana with "Pol" (for Paul), we have also to admit Christianism has been from the right beginning a vast synthesis between several similar or very proximate religious currents.
It is not really impossible, as we know already there was a strong influence of Mithraïsm for instance, so why not a discrete influence of Apollonios of Tyana too ?
Following the same logic, the historicity of Jesus himself, sometimes doubted nowadays, would derive more in fact from his Partner in life, Maria-Magdalena, and the spouses Pilatus (Pontius Pilatus and his beloved wife, the Roman princess Claudia Procula), rather than only from the four traditional Evangelists.
And the same goes for his Resurrection and his recognized Divinity !
Tuesday, January 7, 2020
Storia u-cronaca VIII : il "Cammino dell'Alba", lascito di De Batz e di Boissy d'Anglas !
per Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Dottore in Geografia Economica, Ph. D
tradotto ed adattato dell' inglese all' italiano per se
_________________________
Ecco la traduzione del nostro articolo intitolato 'Uchronic history VIII : the "Dawn path, a legacy of De Batz and Boissy d'Anglas !', e pubblicato su "Global Politics and Economics" il 1° Gennaio 2020.
*****
Una corrente trasversale ignorata potrebbe periodicamente dare il sopravvento alla vita politica, sociale ed economica francese dopo la Rivoluzione : quello del Barone Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) e del Conte Boissy d'Anglas (1756 - 1826).
Lo chiamiamo "il Cammino dell'Alba", come il suo obiettivo sarebbe quello di migliorare la vita quotidiana anche se l'apertura di un nuovo giorno dopo l'alba, con un pragmatismo ottimista.
Abbiamo già attirato la vostra attenzione con quei due uomini d'eccezione, con il nostro articolo originale pubblicato su "Global Politics and Economics" il 2 agosto 2019 : "Storia u-cronaca V : De batz - Boissy d'Anglas, una amicizia trascurata !"
La loro corrente potenzialmente restante è del Sud, ma ha anche toccato tutto l'Atlantico Ovest, e anche la "Città senza Nome" che ha terribilmente sofferto sotto i Giacobini tra gli altri, sul lato oposite della Francia (Lyon). La particolarità di Lyon è che perse anche il suo nome, durante la Rivoluzione !
I nostri due protagonisti venivano infatti dal Sud-Ovest della Francia per il primo (castello di Gouts, richiamando la parola "Guts" in inglese), e dal Sud-Est per il secondo (Annonay).
La loro tendenza commune è stata caratterizzata da tolleranza, una provata intraprendenza, e una notevole ingegnosità per addatarsi e sopravvivere ad un periodo estremamente pericoloso e caotico.
E sotto molti aspetti, questo Cammino utile e pratico (in un tempo simile) apparirebbe paradossalmente cosi' moderato e discreto nei fatti, che molti osservatori non avrebbero mai potuto identificarlo, per più di due secoli !
Sarebbe la Via di Mezzo : quella della Riconciliazione Francese.
Non troppo prepotenti, ma abili e giovali, quei due Nobili diedero il sapore del terroir dimenticato e del cuore della Francia.
Si sono opposti fin dall'inizio ai supremazisti Giacobini una resistenza sorpredente ma di successo, con il loro modo focalizzato : alla cecità iniqua, massacri ripetuti, e crudeltà, si sono opposti alla loro abilità, il loro tatto, la loro efficienza...e ultima ma non ultima la loro umanità !
Di fatto, la Corrente geniale e genuina che ci hanno dato per lascito storico, basata semplicemente sulla volontà, l'auto-aiuto e il buon senso, non cercherebbe di sottomettere brutalmente gli individui - chiunque essi siano -, a diktat incomprensibili e inumani.
Prenderebbe semplicemente le persone come sono, rispetando i loro diritti fondamentali, indipendentemente dal genere, dall'età, o dall'origine.
Essa considera la Francia sopratutto, come un'entità geografica realmente viva che merita grande rispetto.
Quindi, paradossalmente, anche se non prometteva una "Grande Serata", avrebbe portato in sé la "Grande Serata" !
Alcuni ottimi osservatori potrebbero anche vedere in esso le stupefazioni, impercettibilmente intrecciate e espressioni del vecchio mondo di un idealizato "Regalismo" (come cavalleresco, ordinato e glorioso), e il "Sermone sulla Montagna" con le sue beatitudini suggerite (San Matteo, V-7), completamente mescolati !
Apparirebbe come una Corrente sottoreana trascedente, con le sue influenze incrociate e discrete che fanno (o annulo) una Maggioranza.
Impercettibile ed enigmatico, solo le menti più illuminate sarebbero in grado di seguire (...o indovinare) i suoi meandri. Infatti, sembra piuttosto furtivo, anche se preciso come una forza motrice sconosciuta.
Trarrebbe la sua potenza impressionnante ed efficace, dalla sua forza di coesione attiva : interagirebbe come un "collagene" politico e sociale, per dare un'immagine abbastanza espressiva della Rigenerazione !
Questo "Sentiero dell'Alba" potrebbe essere quello di una Francia eterna che rifiuta di morire, e mostra ogni giorno con una penetrante ostinazione quanto essia sia viva e perenne.
Sarebbero le anime e la capacità riscoperte, e non la dispersione !
A volte, la sua improvvisa audacia potrebbe quasi apparire come il sueno mezzo scherzo di un moschettiere della Guascogna. Infatti, durante tutta la sua vita avventuroza e molto ricca, Jean de Batz ha cercato di comportarsi come un altro uomo molto famoso nella sua famiglia, Charles de Batz - meglio conosciuto con il nome di D'Artagnan (1611~1615 - 1673).
E come lui, mori`con il altamente onorevole titolo di "Maresciallo del Re", con i segreti delle sue sfide più formidabili e delle sue storiche risultati.
Tornando a nostri due eroi del giorno, il Barone Jean de Batz e il Conte François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas, è importante ricordare un aneddoto trascurato.
E`claro oggi che il rapido rilascio di Jean de Batz con un abbandono di tutte le cariche, dopo il brevissimo sussulto monarchico del 13 Vendemiario anno IV (5 ottobre 1795), non è stato solo a causa dell'aiuto segreto di la Signorina "Désirée" Thilorier (la sua futura moglie) e la Marchesa di Janson (alias Marie-Antoinette), ma anche al discretissimo intervento del influente Conte Boissy d'Anglas !
Per concludere, questo percorso straordinario trarrebbe la sua forza e la sua potenza da una terra di abbondanza ("pays de cocagne" in francese), che non è mai stato del tutto imaginario !
Rappresenterebbe la luce di fronte all'oscurità, anche se non avrebbe paura del grido del gufo di Chouani da una notte senza luna !
Come Creatore Riconosciuto di Richezza, il Barone Jean de Batz non avrebbe certamente negato l'impatto della misteriosa lettera "k", che Lord John Maynard Keynes, Barone di Tilton (1886 - 1946) ha messo in evidenza molto tempo dopo, come moltiplicatore di richezza per il maggior numero di persone.
Il fatto che il nostro "nuovo D'Artagnan" ha creato la prima Compagnia di Assicurazione sulla Vita in Francia, è un'altra particolarità.
In questo nuovo campo, è stato in grado di sviluppare una rete internazionale sullo sfondo.
Come era un uomo molto convinto, il Barone de Batz si è assicurato il successo di questa attività per le persone Reali.
E`intervenuto di persona nelle due operazioni audaci di salvataggio del Re Louis XVI (lungo il "52 rue de Beauregard" in Parigi, la mattina del 21 gennaio 1793), e della Regina Marie-Antoinette (vicino alla via d'uscità della Prigione della Conciergerie anche a Parigi, nella notte decisiva del 30 agosto 1793).
Per proseguire, bisogna aggiungere che ha salvato molte persone proibite. Prima che potessero rifugiarsi all'estero, li ha messo al sicuro nella sua residenza discreta della "rue de Charonne", o in uno dei suoi amici luogo, "rue de Cléry" per esempio. La seconda si trova proprio dietro la "rue de Beauregard" quando si passa il vicolo più corto di Parigi, (5,75 metri di lunghezza), tra i numeri "50" e "52 rue de Beauregard" giustamente : la "rue des degrés", che è scala. Avrebbe dovuto essere chiamata la "rue du miracle de la Vierge" (la strada "del miracolo della Vergine"), data la sua importanza storica in un slancio piuttosto determinante.
Contro ogni previsione, l'alleanza sacra e molto discreta che il Barone de Batz e il Conte Boissy d'Anglas forgiarono più di due secoli fa, sarebbe ancora operando come il cuore santo di un archetipo al servizio della Francia eterna.
Ha funzionato creativamente mettendo fine alla Rivoluzione, con il regime molto originale del Direttorio (1795 - 1799).
Questa Corrente ecumenica sarebbe davvero molto paradossale, ma sopratutto sarebbe Serenità, Gioia della Vita, e Serendipità in questo mondo di ricreazione permanente !
Nella nostra prima Cronaca della "Storia u-cronaca", quando abbiamo parlato della forza trascurata dei presunti inesistenti "Nuovi Chouani" per le elezioni prezidenziali, avevamo ovviamente una tale Corrente ignorata in mente.
Rileggete cio` che abbiamo scritto il 1° Febbraio 2017, nel nostro articolo intitolato 'L'ondata di "nostalgia" nella nueva Francia : una storia u-cronaca per la fantasia dal 2017 !'
Con una distanza di quasi tre anni, si puo` vedere come effetivo è diventato quello che abbiamo indovinato.
Abbiamo concluso in particolare sulle elezioni presidenziali che dovevano arrivare tre mesi dopo, che "la nostalgia è la chiave segreta per capire il popolo francese".
E oggi la fiducia nel fascino euristico della tacca, potrebbe essere aggiunto !
tradotto ed adattato dell' inglese all' italiano per se
_________________________
Ecco la traduzione del nostro articolo intitolato 'Uchronic history VIII : the "Dawn path, a legacy of De Batz and Boissy d'Anglas !', e pubblicato su "Global Politics and Economics" il 1° Gennaio 2020.
*****
Una corrente trasversale ignorata potrebbe periodicamente dare il sopravvento alla vita politica, sociale ed economica francese dopo la Rivoluzione : quello del Barone Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) e del Conte Boissy d'Anglas (1756 - 1826).
Lo chiamiamo "il Cammino dell'Alba", come il suo obiettivo sarebbe quello di migliorare la vita quotidiana anche se l'apertura di un nuovo giorno dopo l'alba, con un pragmatismo ottimista.
Abbiamo già attirato la vostra attenzione con quei due uomini d'eccezione, con il nostro articolo originale pubblicato su "Global Politics and Economics" il 2 agosto 2019 : "Storia u-cronaca V : De batz - Boissy d'Anglas, una amicizia trascurata !"
La loro corrente potenzialmente restante è del Sud, ma ha anche toccato tutto l'Atlantico Ovest, e anche la "Città senza Nome" che ha terribilmente sofferto sotto i Giacobini tra gli altri, sul lato oposite della Francia (Lyon). La particolarità di Lyon è che perse anche il suo nome, durante la Rivoluzione !
I nostri due protagonisti venivano infatti dal Sud-Ovest della Francia per il primo (castello di Gouts, richiamando la parola "Guts" in inglese), e dal Sud-Est per il secondo (Annonay).
La loro tendenza commune è stata caratterizzata da tolleranza, una provata intraprendenza, e una notevole ingegnosità per addatarsi e sopravvivere ad un periodo estremamente pericoloso e caotico.
E sotto molti aspetti, questo Cammino utile e pratico (in un tempo simile) apparirebbe paradossalmente cosi' moderato e discreto nei fatti, che molti osservatori non avrebbero mai potuto identificarlo, per più di due secoli !
Sarebbe la Via di Mezzo : quella della Riconciliazione Francese.
Non troppo prepotenti, ma abili e giovali, quei due Nobili diedero il sapore del terroir dimenticato e del cuore della Francia.
Si sono opposti fin dall'inizio ai supremazisti Giacobini una resistenza sorpredente ma di successo, con il loro modo focalizzato : alla cecità iniqua, massacri ripetuti, e crudeltà, si sono opposti alla loro abilità, il loro tatto, la loro efficienza...e ultima ma non ultima la loro umanità !
Di fatto, la Corrente geniale e genuina che ci hanno dato per lascito storico, basata semplicemente sulla volontà, l'auto-aiuto e il buon senso, non cercherebbe di sottomettere brutalmente gli individui - chiunque essi siano -, a diktat incomprensibili e inumani.
Prenderebbe semplicemente le persone come sono, rispetando i loro diritti fondamentali, indipendentemente dal genere, dall'età, o dall'origine.
Essa considera la Francia sopratutto, come un'entità geografica realmente viva che merita grande rispetto.
Quindi, paradossalmente, anche se non prometteva una "Grande Serata", avrebbe portato in sé la "Grande Serata" !
Alcuni ottimi osservatori potrebbero anche vedere in esso le stupefazioni, impercettibilmente intrecciate e espressioni del vecchio mondo di un idealizato "Regalismo" (come cavalleresco, ordinato e glorioso), e il "Sermone sulla Montagna" con le sue beatitudini suggerite (San Matteo, V-7), completamente mescolati !
Apparirebbe come una Corrente sottoreana trascedente, con le sue influenze incrociate e discrete che fanno (o annulo) una Maggioranza.
Impercettibile ed enigmatico, solo le menti più illuminate sarebbero in grado di seguire (...o indovinare) i suoi meandri. Infatti, sembra piuttosto furtivo, anche se preciso come una forza motrice sconosciuta.
Trarrebbe la sua potenza impressionnante ed efficace, dalla sua forza di coesione attiva : interagirebbe come un "collagene" politico e sociale, per dare un'immagine abbastanza espressiva della Rigenerazione !
Questo "Sentiero dell'Alba" potrebbe essere quello di una Francia eterna che rifiuta di morire, e mostra ogni giorno con una penetrante ostinazione quanto essia sia viva e perenne.
Sarebbero le anime e la capacità riscoperte, e non la dispersione !
A volte, la sua improvvisa audacia potrebbe quasi apparire come il sueno mezzo scherzo di un moschettiere della Guascogna. Infatti, durante tutta la sua vita avventuroza e molto ricca, Jean de Batz ha cercato di comportarsi come un altro uomo molto famoso nella sua famiglia, Charles de Batz - meglio conosciuto con il nome di D'Artagnan (1611~1615 - 1673).
E come lui, mori`con il altamente onorevole titolo di "Maresciallo del Re", con i segreti delle sue sfide più formidabili e delle sue storiche risultati.
Tornando a nostri due eroi del giorno, il Barone Jean de Batz e il Conte François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas, è importante ricordare un aneddoto trascurato.
E`claro oggi che il rapido rilascio di Jean de Batz con un abbandono di tutte le cariche, dopo il brevissimo sussulto monarchico del 13 Vendemiario anno IV (5 ottobre 1795), non è stato solo a causa dell'aiuto segreto di la Signorina "Désirée" Thilorier (la sua futura moglie) e la Marchesa di Janson (alias Marie-Antoinette), ma anche al discretissimo intervento del influente Conte Boissy d'Anglas !
Per concludere, questo percorso straordinario trarrebbe la sua forza e la sua potenza da una terra di abbondanza ("pays de cocagne" in francese), che non è mai stato del tutto imaginario !
Rappresenterebbe la luce di fronte all'oscurità, anche se non avrebbe paura del grido del gufo di Chouani da una notte senza luna !
Come Creatore Riconosciuto di Richezza, il Barone Jean de Batz non avrebbe certamente negato l'impatto della misteriosa lettera "k", che Lord John Maynard Keynes, Barone di Tilton (1886 - 1946) ha messo in evidenza molto tempo dopo, come moltiplicatore di richezza per il maggior numero di persone.
Il fatto che il nostro "nuovo D'Artagnan" ha creato la prima Compagnia di Assicurazione sulla Vita in Francia, è un'altra particolarità.
In questo nuovo campo, è stato in grado di sviluppare una rete internazionale sullo sfondo.
Come era un uomo molto convinto, il Barone de Batz si è assicurato il successo di questa attività per le persone Reali.
E`intervenuto di persona nelle due operazioni audaci di salvataggio del Re Louis XVI (lungo il "52 rue de Beauregard" in Parigi, la mattina del 21 gennaio 1793), e della Regina Marie-Antoinette (vicino alla via d'uscità della Prigione della Conciergerie anche a Parigi, nella notte decisiva del 30 agosto 1793).
Per proseguire, bisogna aggiungere che ha salvato molte persone proibite. Prima che potessero rifugiarsi all'estero, li ha messo al sicuro nella sua residenza discreta della "rue de Charonne", o in uno dei suoi amici luogo, "rue de Cléry" per esempio. La seconda si trova proprio dietro la "rue de Beauregard" quando si passa il vicolo più corto di Parigi, (5,75 metri di lunghezza), tra i numeri "50" e "52 rue de Beauregard" giustamente : la "rue des degrés", che è scala. Avrebbe dovuto essere chiamata la "rue du miracle de la Vierge" (la strada "del miracolo della Vergine"), data la sua importanza storica in un slancio piuttosto determinante.
Contro ogni previsione, l'alleanza sacra e molto discreta che il Barone de Batz e il Conte Boissy d'Anglas forgiarono più di due secoli fa, sarebbe ancora operando come il cuore santo di un archetipo al servizio della Francia eterna.
Ha funzionato creativamente mettendo fine alla Rivoluzione, con il regime molto originale del Direttorio (1795 - 1799).
Questa Corrente ecumenica sarebbe davvero molto paradossale, ma sopratutto sarebbe Serenità, Gioia della Vita, e Serendipità in questo mondo di ricreazione permanente !
Nella nostra prima Cronaca della "Storia u-cronaca", quando abbiamo parlato della forza trascurata dei presunti inesistenti "Nuovi Chouani" per le elezioni prezidenziali, avevamo ovviamente una tale Corrente ignorata in mente.
Rileggete cio` che abbiamo scritto il 1° Febbraio 2017, nel nostro articolo intitolato 'L'ondata di "nostalgia" nella nueva Francia : una storia u-cronaca per la fantasia dal 2017 !'
Con una distanza di quasi tre anni, si puo` vedere come effetivo è diventato quello che abbiamo indovinato.
Abbiamo concluso in particolare sulle elezioni presidenziali che dovevano arrivare tre mesi dopo, che "la nostalgia è la chiave segreta per capire il popolo francese".
E oggi la fiducia nel fascino euristico della tacca, potrebbe essere aggiunto !
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Uchronic history VIII : the "Dawn Path", a legacy of De Batz and Boissy d'Anglas !
by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph.D
___________________________
An ignored transverse Current might periodically give overhong to the French political, social, and economic life since the Revolution : the one of the Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) and the Count François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas (1756 - 1826).
We call it the "Dawn Path", as its aim would be to improve everyday life through the opening of a new day after Dawn, with an optimistic pragmatism.
We attracted already your attention about those two men of exception, with our original article published on "Global politics and economics" on August 2nd, 2019 : "Uchronic history V : De Batz - Boissy d'Anglas, an overlooked friendship !".
Their potentially remaining Current is Southern, but it has also touched all the Atlantic West, and even the courageous "Nameless City" which terribly suffered among others under the Jacobines, on the opposite side of France (Lyon). The unusual peculiarity of Lyon is that it even lost its name, during the Revolution !
Our two protagonists were coming indeed from the South-West of France for the first one (castle of Gouts, recalling the word "Guts" in English), and from the South-East for the second (Annonay).
Their common trend was marked by tolerance, a proven resourcefulness, and a remarkable ingeniosity to adapt and survive an extremely dangerous and chaotic period.
And in many respects, this useful and practical Path (in a similar time) would appear paradoxically so moderate and discreet in the facts, that many observers would have never been able to identify it, for more than two centuries !
It would be the Middle Path : the one of France Appeasement. Not excessively domineering, but smart and jovial fellows, those two noblemen gave the taste of the forgotten terroirs and the heartland of France.
They opposed from the right beginning to the supremacist Jacobines a surprising but successful resistance, with their own focused way : to iniquitous blindness, repeated massacres, and cruelty, they opposed their skill, their tact, and their efficiency...and last but not least their humanity !
As a matter of fact, the ingenious and genuine Current they gave us by Historical Legacy, simply based upon will, self-help, and common sense, wouldn't seek to brutally submit individuals - whoever they are -, to incomprehensible and inhuman diktats.
It would simply take people as they are, by respecting their basic rights whatever the gender, age, or origin.
It considers France, above all, as a truly living geographical entity which is deserving great respect.
So then very paradoxically, though it wouldn't promise any "Great Evening", it would carry in itself the "Great Evening" !
Some fine observers might even see in it the astonishingly intertwined and old-world expressions of an idealized "Royalism" (as chivalrous, orderly, and glorious), and the "Sermon on the Mountain" with its suggested beatitudes (Saint Matthew, V-7), totally mixed up !
It would appear as a transcendent underground Current, with its crossed and discreet influences, making (or unmaking) a Majority. Imperceptible and enigmatic, only the most enlightened minds would be able to follow (...or guess) its meanders. In fact, it seems rather stealthy, although precise as an unknown driving force.
It would draw its impressive and effective power, from its force of active cohesion : it would interact as a kind of political and social "collagen", to give a quite expressive image of Regeneration !
This "Dawn Path" might be the one of an eternal France which is refusing to die, and is showing every day with a penetrating obstination how much it is staying alive and vivid.
It would be the gathering of the rediscovered souls and abilities, and not the dispersion !
Sometimes, its sudden boldness could almost appear as the sound half-joke of a Musketeer from Gascony. In fact during all his adventurous and very rich life, Jean de Batz tried to behave like another very famous man in his family, Charles de Batz - better known under the name of D'Artagnan (1611~ 1615 - 1673). And like him, he died with the highly honourable title of "Marschal of the King", with the secrets of his most formidable challenges and historical achievements.
Coming back to our two heroes of the day, the Baron Jean de Batz and the Count François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas, it is important to recall an overlooked anecdote.
It is clearly thought nowadays, that the rapid release of Jean de Batz with a waiver of all charges, after the very brief Royalist startle of Vendémiaire 13th, Year IV (October 5th, 1795), was not only due to the secret help of Mademoiselle "Désirée" Thilorier (his future wife) and the Marchioness of Janson (aka Marie-Antoinette), but also to the very discreet intervention of the influent Count Boissy d'Anglas !
Active Hope, astuteness as well as incredible luck through realization, and panache, remain their sovereign "Engines" beyond centuries !
They must have felt happy when they retired from life at the Sunset of their astonishing destiny, by contemplating retrospectively all their actions of brilliance and their daring strokes !
To conclude, this amazing Path would draw its strength and stimulating power from a "land of plenty" ("pays de cocagne" in French), which has never been entirely imaginary !
It would be representing the light in front of obscurity, even it wouldn't be afraid of the owl's cry of Chouans on a Moonless night !
As a recognized Wealth Creative Maker, the Baron Jean de Batz wouldn't certainly have denied the unlocking impact of the mysterious letter "k", that Lord John Maynard Keynes, Baron of Tilton (1883 - 1946) put on evidence far after, as the "multiplicator of wealth" for the largest number !
The fact our "new D'Artagnan" created the first Life Insurance Company in France is another peculiarity. In this new field, he was able to develop an international network in the background.
As he was a very convinced man, the Baron de Batz ensured himself the success of this operational activity for Royals. Didn't he intervene in person in the two bold operations of rescue of the King Louis XVI (along the "52 rue de Beauregard" in Paris, in the morning of January 21st, 1793), and the Queen Marie-Antoinette (near the way out of the Conciergerie Jail in Paris too, on the decisive night of August 30th, 1793) ?
To go further, it has to be added that he saved a lot of proscribed people. Before they could take refuge abroad, he sheltered them in his discreet residence of the "rue de Charonne", or at one of his friends' place, "rue de Cléry" for instance. The latter is situated just behind the "rue de Beauregard", when you pass the shortest street of Paris (5.75 meters long) in between the numbers "50" and "52 rue de Beauregard" precisely, the staircase "rue des degrés" : it should have been called the "rue du Miracle de la Vierge" (the "street of the Virgin Miracle"), owing to its historical importance in a quite determining momentum.
Against all odds, the sacred and very discreet alliance the Baron de Batz and the Count Boissy d'Anglas forged more than two centuries ago, would still be operating like the holy heart of an archetype to the service of eternal France.
It worked creatively by putting an end to the Revolution, with the very original regime of Directoire (1795 - 1799).
With a distance of almost three years now, you can see how effective became what we guessed.
We particularly concluded about the presidential election which had to come three months later, that "nostalgy is the secret key to understand French people".
And today, confidence in the alluring heuristic of the notch could be added !
___________________________
An ignored transverse Current might periodically give overhong to the French political, social, and economic life since the Revolution : the one of the Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) and the Count François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas (1756 - 1826).
We call it the "Dawn Path", as its aim would be to improve everyday life through the opening of a new day after Dawn, with an optimistic pragmatism.
We attracted already your attention about those two men of exception, with our original article published on "Global politics and economics" on August 2nd, 2019 : "Uchronic history V : De Batz - Boissy d'Anglas, an overlooked friendship !".
Their potentially remaining Current is Southern, but it has also touched all the Atlantic West, and even the courageous "Nameless City" which terribly suffered among others under the Jacobines, on the opposite side of France (Lyon). The unusual peculiarity of Lyon is that it even lost its name, during the Revolution !
Our two protagonists were coming indeed from the South-West of France for the first one (castle of Gouts, recalling the word "Guts" in English), and from the South-East for the second (Annonay).
Their common trend was marked by tolerance, a proven resourcefulness, and a remarkable ingeniosity to adapt and survive an extremely dangerous and chaotic period.
And in many respects, this useful and practical Path (in a similar time) would appear paradoxically so moderate and discreet in the facts, that many observers would have never been able to identify it, for more than two centuries !
It would be the Middle Path : the one of France Appeasement. Not excessively domineering, but smart and jovial fellows, those two noblemen gave the taste of the forgotten terroirs and the heartland of France.
They opposed from the right beginning to the supremacist Jacobines a surprising but successful resistance, with their own focused way : to iniquitous blindness, repeated massacres, and cruelty, they opposed their skill, their tact, and their efficiency...and last but not least their humanity !
As a matter of fact, the ingenious and genuine Current they gave us by Historical Legacy, simply based upon will, self-help, and common sense, wouldn't seek to brutally submit individuals - whoever they are -, to incomprehensible and inhuman diktats.
It would simply take people as they are, by respecting their basic rights whatever the gender, age, or origin.
It considers France, above all, as a truly living geographical entity which is deserving great respect.
So then very paradoxically, though it wouldn't promise any "Great Evening", it would carry in itself the "Great Evening" !
Some fine observers might even see in it the astonishingly intertwined and old-world expressions of an idealized "Royalism" (as chivalrous, orderly, and glorious), and the "Sermon on the Mountain" with its suggested beatitudes (Saint Matthew, V-7), totally mixed up !
It would appear as a transcendent underground Current, with its crossed and discreet influences, making (or unmaking) a Majority. Imperceptible and enigmatic, only the most enlightened minds would be able to follow (...or guess) its meanders. In fact, it seems rather stealthy, although precise as an unknown driving force.
It would draw its impressive and effective power, from its force of active cohesion : it would interact as a kind of political and social "collagen", to give a quite expressive image of Regeneration !
This "Dawn Path" might be the one of an eternal France which is refusing to die, and is showing every day with a penetrating obstination how much it is staying alive and vivid.
It would be the gathering of the rediscovered souls and abilities, and not the dispersion !
Sometimes, its sudden boldness could almost appear as the sound half-joke of a Musketeer from Gascony. In fact during all his adventurous and very rich life, Jean de Batz tried to behave like another very famous man in his family, Charles de Batz - better known under the name of D'Artagnan (1611~ 1615 - 1673). And like him, he died with the highly honourable title of "Marschal of the King", with the secrets of his most formidable challenges and historical achievements.
Coming back to our two heroes of the day, the Baron Jean de Batz and the Count François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas, it is important to recall an overlooked anecdote.
It is clearly thought nowadays, that the rapid release of Jean de Batz with a waiver of all charges, after the very brief Royalist startle of Vendémiaire 13th, Year IV (October 5th, 1795), was not only due to the secret help of Mademoiselle "Désirée" Thilorier (his future wife) and the Marchioness of Janson (aka Marie-Antoinette), but also to the very discreet intervention of the influent Count Boissy d'Anglas !
Active Hope, astuteness as well as incredible luck through realization, and panache, remain their sovereign "Engines" beyond centuries !
They must have felt happy when they retired from life at the Sunset of their astonishing destiny, by contemplating retrospectively all their actions of brilliance and their daring strokes !
To conclude, this amazing Path would draw its strength and stimulating power from a "land of plenty" ("pays de cocagne" in French), which has never been entirely imaginary !
It would be representing the light in front of obscurity, even it wouldn't be afraid of the owl's cry of Chouans on a Moonless night !
As a recognized Wealth Creative Maker, the Baron Jean de Batz wouldn't certainly have denied the unlocking impact of the mysterious letter "k", that Lord John Maynard Keynes, Baron of Tilton (1883 - 1946) put on evidence far after, as the "multiplicator of wealth" for the largest number !
The fact our "new D'Artagnan" created the first Life Insurance Company in France is another peculiarity. In this new field, he was able to develop an international network in the background.
As he was a very convinced man, the Baron de Batz ensured himself the success of this operational activity for Royals. Didn't he intervene in person in the two bold operations of rescue of the King Louis XVI (along the "52 rue de Beauregard" in Paris, in the morning of January 21st, 1793), and the Queen Marie-Antoinette (near the way out of the Conciergerie Jail in Paris too, on the decisive night of August 30th, 1793) ?
To go further, it has to be added that he saved a lot of proscribed people. Before they could take refuge abroad, he sheltered them in his discreet residence of the "rue de Charonne", or at one of his friends' place, "rue de Cléry" for instance. The latter is situated just behind the "rue de Beauregard", when you pass the shortest street of Paris (5.75 meters long) in between the numbers "50" and "52 rue de Beauregard" precisely, the staircase "rue des degrés" : it should have been called the "rue du Miracle de la Vierge" (the "street of the Virgin Miracle"), owing to its historical importance in a quite determining momentum.
Against all odds, the sacred and very discreet alliance the Baron de Batz and the Count Boissy d'Anglas forged more than two centuries ago, would still be operating like the holy heart of an archetype to the service of eternal France.
It worked creatively by putting an end to the Revolution, with the very original regime of Directoire (1795 - 1799).
This oecumenic Current would be indeed very paradoxical, but above all it would be Serenity, Joy of Life, and Serendipity in this world of permanent recreation !
In our first chronicle of "Uchronic history", when we talked about the overlooked force of the supposingly non-existent "New Chouans" for the presidential election, we had obviously such an ignored Current in mind.
Read again what we wrote on February 1st, 2017, in our article untitled 'The surge of "nostalgy" in the new France : a uchronic history for fantasy from 2017 !'In our first chronicle of "Uchronic history", when we talked about the overlooked force of the supposingly non-existent "New Chouans" for the presidential election, we had obviously such an ignored Current in mind.
With a distance of almost three years now, you can see how effective became what we guessed.
We particularly concluded about the presidential election which had to come three months later, that "nostalgy is the secret key to understand French people".
And today, confidence in the alluring heuristic of the notch could be added !
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)