by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D
___________________________
This is our new article of "Just science-fiction", our mascot series.
So you have to take it this way obviously.
Today, we will talk about the ignored war happening presently on Earth between Alpha Centaurians and Sirians, both ET people being amphibians.
The main place they are at fight, with immediate consequences for human beings, is the Gulf of Aden and its surroundings at large.
Since 2012, at the occasion of this renewed ancestral war on Earth, a strange vortex has fully reopened near Aden and Yemen below the waters : the fearful "Eye of Ra" !
As usually, just enjoy our narration as a masterpiece of imagination, that's all !
*****
Presently, Earthlings are completely overestimating their power to halt the "global warming". Sometimes, this huge forecasted change is also called in a more neutral manner "global climatic change" : the reason is we don't know yet if it will not end up with a new ice age, paradoxically.
People are pushed to think that Earthling scientists can totally master the future of Earth, when it might not be really in their power.
If only human beings were the primary cause of the greatest changes on the global variations of climate, because of pollution...and human wars also on half of the planet, they could perhaps have a real impact on them. However, they forget a bit too quickly the obvious role of the Sun, source of life on Earth (symbolized by the God Ra of the ancient Egyptian religion), among other causes.
On a scientific point of view, it is known from a long time that the Sun is influencing meteorology.
The topic of the "Carbon Print", half scientific and half ideological now, is submitted to this finding.
It is probably good to be aware about the "Carbon print" concern. But once you have made this observation, what feasible solutions to propose then to avoid returning to the Cave Age ?
Anyhow, we musn't ignore either that other types of populations are living on Earth from an immemorial time - so far before modern Earthlings were created by genetic engineering.
And when they don't get on for immemorial disputes, they never hesitate to fight for supremacy...just like human beings always do despite their words often wrapped in honey, by the way !
It's exactly what is happening for the control of the strategic location of the Gulf of Aden, near Yemen...which is also not so far from Saudi Arabia westward.
Just above geographically, there is the Persian Gulf, where any conflict can arise presently about the oil production and trade.
All the great marines of the world can be present over there, it wouldn't change anything : they are powerless to face the Amphibians, and they don't even understand what they are precisely doing.
The only recorded fact is the reopening of the "Eye of Ra" by Amphibian ETs since 2012, is provoking a noticeable rise of the waters not only in this area, but also worldwide.
On December 22nd, 2012, the day after the winter solstice, this submarine vortex was fully operational, while people were laughing at the nonsense of Maya calendar.
It was the first day of "Katun Cauac" (the time of Tempests or Hurricanes), a "katun" lasting 20 years. And this "katun" is just stressing the global change of climate on Earth, without humour whatsoever.
The "Eye of Ra" vortex seems to be bigger than the one below the Bermuda Triangle, controlled by Alpha Centaurians, as another one in the Pacific area.
The reason is this one is used by two extranean civilizations, and not just one : Alpha Centaurians, who created the defunct Empire of Atlantis, and Sirians from Sirius, who were behind the rise of the opponent empire of Lemuria - which was totally disintegrated by Atlantis before.
The reason why this vortex is called the "Eye of Ra" is not totally clear. But to simplify you have to take it as the expression of the supreme power of God Ra, which can be highly destructive. It seems effectively this vortex was already known as dormant, at the time the ancient religion of Egypt was dominant.
Strangely, this vortex is used as a super-fast way of entrance on Earth, for the vessels of those two hereditary enemies.
It works as a huge spatio-temporal door...and more surprisingly also as a supreme quantic weapon !
America seems to be secretely in touch with Alpha Centaurians in the Atlantic Ocean : they are said to be sharing the submarine complex "T3", near the airport of Sao Miguel (Azores, Portugal).
But if Alpha Centaurians signed the "Corporative Treaties" of 1950 and 1954, concerning the rules applied to the signatory ETs in their relations with Earthlings, it's not the case apparently of Sirians.
So the latters consider they do what they want on Earth, especially when facing Alpha Centaurians in their ancient historical area of influence, starting from the Gulf of Aden.
As a conclusion, the above observations don't mean Sirians - from Sirius - despise Earthlings, and certainly not the way the latters intend to despise them and their anteriority on Earth.
The fact they are said to be non existent, is probably the most brazen way not to respect them, including for the Alpha Centaurians.
Both of them fully understand, that this absurd and idiotic despise is hiding an unescapable fear and a feeling of impotence. Yet, it could explain why they want to show to clever people, that they have also to be taken on account, with their rights being fully respected !
And beyond this strange war of Amphibians, another design could be perceptible then.
A small part of top people forming an elite on Earth, wonder how much they should open the door of an inevitable "Disclosure" ? Soon, it might have no importance anymore, because it is the "Disclosure" which will open below Earthlings' feet, like a gigantic whirlpool !
to be followed...
Tuesday, October 15, 2019
Tuesday, October 8, 2019
Storia u-cronaca V : De Batz-Boissy d'Anglas, una amicizia trascurata !
per Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Dottore in Geografia Economica, Ph. D
tradotto ed adattato dell' inglese all' italiano per se
___________________________
Qui è una traduzione del nostro articolo intitolato "Uchronic history V : De Batz-Boissy d'Anglas, an overlooked friendship !", pubblicato su "Global Politics and Economics" il 2 agosto 2019.
******
Oggi, stiamo andando alcuni nuovi elementi riguardanti i segreti meglio custoditi della Rivoluzione Francese. In tali circostanze, è importante collegare il Barone Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) ad un altro uomo coraggioso dell'epoca della Rivoluzione, il Conte François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas (1756 -1826).
Entrambi erano deputati al margine della Rivoluzione : il primo rappresentava la Nobiltà di Nérac (Sud-Ovest), e il secondo il Terzo Stato di Annonay (Sud-Est).
Quando De Batz, in qualità di Presidente del Comitato di Liquidazione della Costituente, concluse che un certo signor Sérier, Capo della Compagnia Francese per l'Acqua di Parigi, doveva 20 millioni di sterline francesi al tesoro del Re, il successivo applaudi.
Egli intendeva, che l'amministratore Sérier avrebbe dovuto pagare questo importo per alleviare il Debito Francese. Non dimenticare l'origine della convocazione degli Stati Generali per Maggio 1789 dal Re, fu direttamente collegato alla crisi del Debito Francese !
Nel Gennaio 1793, in qualità di deputato della Convenzione, Boissy d'Anglas ha avuto il coraggio di votare contro la morte di Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), soprannominato malvagiamente "Luigi l'Ultimo" - "Louis le dernier" in francese. E il Barone de Batz fu molto impressionato dal suo coraggio rischioso, in una situazione cosi`eccezionale.
Il Conte Boissy d'Anglas era un protestante moderato attacato a la libertà di religione.
Oltre alla loro piccola differenza religiosa, lui e De Batz erano uniti nelle stesse credenze di vera giustizia, libertà di parola, e libertà nel modo cristiano.
Jean de Batz ricorda il suo antenato Manaud III de Batz, con altri tre uomini, aveva salvato nel 1577 la vita di Henri de Navarre (1553 - 1610), un protestante a quel tempo quando entro' nella città di Eause (Ducato di Albret). Cio`avvenne prima che quest'ultimo fondasse la dinastia dei Bourbons, Rei di Francia e di Navarra, sotto il nome di Henri IV.
Conoscete già alcuni dettagli importanti sul Barone Jean de Batz, attraverso i nostri articoli precedenti. Cosi` siete informati, ha lanciato un'operazione molto audace di salvataggio del Re con un doppio - lungo il numero 52 rue de Beauregard a Parigi, vicino al Boulevard Bonne Nouvelle -, e potrebbe sfuggire non solo (Mattina del 21 Gennaio 1793).
Ma lei ignora che Boissy d'Anglas vagava come altri perché il certificato di morte di Louis XVI, che fu "ufficialmente" ghigliottinato di fronte a una grande folla nel 21 Gennaio 1793, era cosi` in ritardo ?
Sapeva che Robespierre (1758 - 1794) continuava ad essere arrabbiato, per l'operazione temeraria di Jean de Batz per salvare il Re. Aveva fallito nel catturare il Barone, visto come un fastidioso e impegnativo Scaramouche, e il suo cosi` importante "protetto".
Questo indicava anche molto che dubitava di aver ucciso il vero Louis XVI, in quel fatidico giorno.
E quando questo certificato fu finalmente redatto quasi due mesi dopo (!) , il 18 Marzo 1793, per fermare le crescenti voci di sopravvivenza, la sua convinzione fu fatta.
Riguardo a Robespierre, quando sai che sosteneva fortemente l'abolizione della pena di morte nel 1789, davvero vagare come lui è venuto a tradire cosi` tanto se stesso e i suoi ideali in meno di quattro anni ?
E' importante notare che François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas, divenne membro del Comitato di Pubblica Sicurezza un anno dopo la caduta di Robespierre durante il 9 e 10 Thermidor Anno II (27 e 28 Iuglio 1794). Egli stesso ha giocato un ruolo in questa notevole caduta.
Robespierre, suo fratello, e i suoi sostenitori immediati sono stati poi ghigliottinati.
Dopo Thermidor, Boissy d'Anglas è venuto per essere responsabile della fornitura di cibo di Parigi, e ha preso il comando dei moderati della Pianura (Centro).
Deve essere sottolineato che la maggior parte degli storici non lo considerano un personaggio molto forte, per la differenza di Robespierre per esempio, che è discutibile.
In ogni caso, la prova è che lui almeno, fu abbastanza intelligente per sopravvivere a un periodo cosi` incerto e pericoloso.
Non c'è certezza, circa la protezione che Jean de Batz avrebbe ricevuto da Boissy d'Anglas durante la Rivoluzione, e vice versa.
Ma una cosa è chiara : nessuno di loro avrebbe accettato che l'altro sarebbe morto o che gli sarebbe successo qualcosa di brutto. Avevano una stima troppo grande l'uno per l'altro, e hanno messo molto in alto la loro amicizia piuttosto discreta.
Per esempio, il 5 Prairial anno III (24 Maggio 1795) quando la Convenzione Boissy d'Anglas presiedeva fu invasa da sanguinosi "Sans culottes" - "sanculotti"- portando la testa del deputato Jean-Bertrand Féraud, ha mantenuto la calma fino all'arrivo piuttosto rapido delle sezioni monarchiche della Guarda Nazionale.
Sotto il Direttorio (1795 - 1799), che contribui` direttamente a stabilire per la pacificazione della Francia, Boissy d'Anglas divenne un membro importante del nuovo Consiglio dei 500. E da quel momento in poi è rientrato nel Club Monarchico di "rue de Clichy" a Parigi.
Senatore sotto l'Impero de Napoleone I (nato nel 1769 - morto nel 1821), divenne un Pari di Francia sotto la Restaurazione.
Il Conte Boissy d'Anglas era nei fatti più potente ed influente politicamente, che la maggior parte degli storici hanno supposto. A differenza di Robespierre per esempio, non ha cercato mai di mettersi in mostra.
Discrezione, equilibrio, rispetto per il rispettoso, e competenza erano le sue parole chiave, come Jean de Batz. Cosi` il Barone fortunato, ha surfato letteralmente sugli sconvolgimenti politici in tempo molto pericoloso. Ed è morto felicemente all'età di 69 anni.
Como epilogo, è importante notare un discendente di Boissy d'Anglas, portando lo stesso nome, era anche un senatore al tempo della Terza Repubblica, che ha iniziato in 1875.
Molto straordinariamente, nel 1910, a causa della petizione dei discendenti dell'enigmatico Naundorff - alias Carl Werg (1775 - 1845), dovette fare un speciale rapporto sulla questione Louis XVII per il Senato. Fu pubblicato nel 1911.
Con un potente effetto Zeigarnik, questo rapporto ha dato a Boissy d'Anglas l'opportunità unica di esprimere la sua stupefacente opinione in qualità di relatore ufficiale : il Delfino poteva fuggire della Prigione dal Tempio, a causa del coinvolgimento degli Inglesi (e apparentemente anche dei Fiamminghi). Per lui era anche un fatto "scientifico". E al di là della petizione di qualcuno in particolare, questo era il più importante.
Egli aggiunse, in connessione con la memoria del suo famoso antenato, che la volontà della Convenzione era di uccidere il ragazzo sostituto muto, a quanto pare avendo cancellato la dinastia di Louis XVI. E nessuno sembra aver capito che non ha chiamato Louis XVII in questo modo, ma il "Delfino" come se suo padre fosse ancora vivo quando fu salvato dai Servizi Segreti Inglesi e da un altro Conte !
Ci auguriamo che vi siano piaciuti quegli elementi e segreti non previsti sulla Rivoluzione Francese, con grandi personaggi che sono stati abili a sopravvivere, senza abbandonare i loro ideali.
Certo, sembra che la provvidenza e la fortuna, fossero dalla parte di quegli uomini valorosi.
In ogni caso, vi lasceremo fare la vostra opinione su quei Maestri della Sopravvivenza, che hanno saputo rimanere fedeli a se stessi, in un periodo rivoluzionario e incerto !
tradotto ed adattato dell' inglese all' italiano per se
___________________________
Qui è una traduzione del nostro articolo intitolato "Uchronic history V : De Batz-Boissy d'Anglas, an overlooked friendship !", pubblicato su "Global Politics and Economics" il 2 agosto 2019.
******
Oggi, stiamo andando alcuni nuovi elementi riguardanti i segreti meglio custoditi della Rivoluzione Francese. In tali circostanze, è importante collegare il Barone Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) ad un altro uomo coraggioso dell'epoca della Rivoluzione, il Conte François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas (1756 -1826).
Entrambi erano deputati al margine della Rivoluzione : il primo rappresentava la Nobiltà di Nérac (Sud-Ovest), e il secondo il Terzo Stato di Annonay (Sud-Est).
Quando De Batz, in qualità di Presidente del Comitato di Liquidazione della Costituente, concluse che un certo signor Sérier, Capo della Compagnia Francese per l'Acqua di Parigi, doveva 20 millioni di sterline francesi al tesoro del Re, il successivo applaudi.
Egli intendeva, che l'amministratore Sérier avrebbe dovuto pagare questo importo per alleviare il Debito Francese. Non dimenticare l'origine della convocazione degli Stati Generali per Maggio 1789 dal Re, fu direttamente collegato alla crisi del Debito Francese !
Nel Gennaio 1793, in qualità di deputato della Convenzione, Boissy d'Anglas ha avuto il coraggio di votare contro la morte di Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), soprannominato malvagiamente "Luigi l'Ultimo" - "Louis le dernier" in francese. E il Barone de Batz fu molto impressionato dal suo coraggio rischioso, in una situazione cosi`eccezionale.
Il Conte Boissy d'Anglas era un protestante moderato attacato a la libertà di religione.
Oltre alla loro piccola differenza religiosa, lui e De Batz erano uniti nelle stesse credenze di vera giustizia, libertà di parola, e libertà nel modo cristiano.
Jean de Batz ricorda il suo antenato Manaud III de Batz, con altri tre uomini, aveva salvato nel 1577 la vita di Henri de Navarre (1553 - 1610), un protestante a quel tempo quando entro' nella città di Eause (Ducato di Albret). Cio`avvenne prima che quest'ultimo fondasse la dinastia dei Bourbons, Rei di Francia e di Navarra, sotto il nome di Henri IV.
Conoscete già alcuni dettagli importanti sul Barone Jean de Batz, attraverso i nostri articoli precedenti. Cosi` siete informati, ha lanciato un'operazione molto audace di salvataggio del Re con un doppio - lungo il numero 52 rue de Beauregard a Parigi, vicino al Boulevard Bonne Nouvelle -, e potrebbe sfuggire non solo (Mattina del 21 Gennaio 1793).
Ma lei ignora che Boissy d'Anglas vagava come altri perché il certificato di morte di Louis XVI, che fu "ufficialmente" ghigliottinato di fronte a una grande folla nel 21 Gennaio 1793, era cosi` in ritardo ?
Sapeva che Robespierre (1758 - 1794) continuava ad essere arrabbiato, per l'operazione temeraria di Jean de Batz per salvare il Re. Aveva fallito nel catturare il Barone, visto come un fastidioso e impegnativo Scaramouche, e il suo cosi` importante "protetto".
Questo indicava anche molto che dubitava di aver ucciso il vero Louis XVI, in quel fatidico giorno.
E quando questo certificato fu finalmente redatto quasi due mesi dopo (!) , il 18 Marzo 1793, per fermare le crescenti voci di sopravvivenza, la sua convinzione fu fatta.
Riguardo a Robespierre, quando sai che sosteneva fortemente l'abolizione della pena di morte nel 1789, davvero vagare come lui è venuto a tradire cosi` tanto se stesso e i suoi ideali in meno di quattro anni ?
E' importante notare che François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas, divenne membro del Comitato di Pubblica Sicurezza un anno dopo la caduta di Robespierre durante il 9 e 10 Thermidor Anno II (27 e 28 Iuglio 1794). Egli stesso ha giocato un ruolo in questa notevole caduta.
Robespierre, suo fratello, e i suoi sostenitori immediati sono stati poi ghigliottinati.
Dopo Thermidor, Boissy d'Anglas è venuto per essere responsabile della fornitura di cibo di Parigi, e ha preso il comando dei moderati della Pianura (Centro).
Deve essere sottolineato che la maggior parte degli storici non lo considerano un personaggio molto forte, per la differenza di Robespierre per esempio, che è discutibile.
In ogni caso, la prova è che lui almeno, fu abbastanza intelligente per sopravvivere a un periodo cosi` incerto e pericoloso.
Non c'è certezza, circa la protezione che Jean de Batz avrebbe ricevuto da Boissy d'Anglas durante la Rivoluzione, e vice versa.
Ma una cosa è chiara : nessuno di loro avrebbe accettato che l'altro sarebbe morto o che gli sarebbe successo qualcosa di brutto. Avevano una stima troppo grande l'uno per l'altro, e hanno messo molto in alto la loro amicizia piuttosto discreta.
Per esempio, il 5 Prairial anno III (24 Maggio 1795) quando la Convenzione Boissy d'Anglas presiedeva fu invasa da sanguinosi "Sans culottes" - "sanculotti"- portando la testa del deputato Jean-Bertrand Féraud, ha mantenuto la calma fino all'arrivo piuttosto rapido delle sezioni monarchiche della Guarda Nazionale.
Sotto il Direttorio (1795 - 1799), che contribui` direttamente a stabilire per la pacificazione della Francia, Boissy d'Anglas divenne un membro importante del nuovo Consiglio dei 500. E da quel momento in poi è rientrato nel Club Monarchico di "rue de Clichy" a Parigi.
Senatore sotto l'Impero de Napoleone I (nato nel 1769 - morto nel 1821), divenne un Pari di Francia sotto la Restaurazione.
Il Conte Boissy d'Anglas era nei fatti più potente ed influente politicamente, che la maggior parte degli storici hanno supposto. A differenza di Robespierre per esempio, non ha cercato mai di mettersi in mostra.
Discrezione, equilibrio, rispetto per il rispettoso, e competenza erano le sue parole chiave, come Jean de Batz. Cosi` il Barone fortunato, ha surfato letteralmente sugli sconvolgimenti politici in tempo molto pericoloso. Ed è morto felicemente all'età di 69 anni.
Como epilogo, è importante notare un discendente di Boissy d'Anglas, portando lo stesso nome, era anche un senatore al tempo della Terza Repubblica, che ha iniziato in 1875.
Molto straordinariamente, nel 1910, a causa della petizione dei discendenti dell'enigmatico Naundorff - alias Carl Werg (1775 - 1845), dovette fare un speciale rapporto sulla questione Louis XVII per il Senato. Fu pubblicato nel 1911.
Con un potente effetto Zeigarnik, questo rapporto ha dato a Boissy d'Anglas l'opportunità unica di esprimere la sua stupefacente opinione in qualità di relatore ufficiale : il Delfino poteva fuggire della Prigione dal Tempio, a causa del coinvolgimento degli Inglesi (e apparentemente anche dei Fiamminghi). Per lui era anche un fatto "scientifico". E al di là della petizione di qualcuno in particolare, questo era il più importante.
Egli aggiunse, in connessione con la memoria del suo famoso antenato, che la volontà della Convenzione era di uccidere il ragazzo sostituto muto, a quanto pare avendo cancellato la dinastia di Louis XVI. E nessuno sembra aver capito che non ha chiamato Louis XVII in questo modo, ma il "Delfino" come se suo padre fosse ancora vivo quando fu salvato dai Servizi Segreti Inglesi e da un altro Conte !
Ci auguriamo che vi siano piaciuti quegli elementi e segreti non previsti sulla Rivoluzione Francese, con grandi personaggi che sono stati abili a sopravvivere, senza abbandonare i loro ideali.
Certo, sembra che la provvidenza e la fortuna, fossero dalla parte di quegli uomini valorosi.
In ogni caso, vi lasceremo fare la vostra opinione su quei Maestri della Sopravvivenza, che hanno saputo rimanere fedeli a se stessi, in un periodo rivoluzionario e incerto !
Tuesday, September 17, 2019
Rediscovering famous characters VII : Maria and Claudia, or the happy end of a marital drama !
by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D
___________________________
Today, behind the title of this article, we are also aiming at talking about a very famous man worlwide.
You certainly know him, but the angle we have chosen to rediscover him will surprise you !
Try to guess whom we are writing about, by being revealed astonishing things concerning those extremely important women both for him and History, Maria and Claudia !
And get ready for amazing revelations !
*******
The story is starting in Palestine, at a time it was a Roman province.
An innocent man was sentenced to death the Roman way, for causing trouble to the Roman public order. The problem for the one who had to pronounce this penalty, was he was totally against death for this innocent. He didn't consider him at all as an enemy of Rome, but as a wise man. And he really tried his best to avoid this bad end.
At a moment, he truly thought the final choice he gave to the people would help him.
But no, adverse circumstances obliged him nolens volens to pronounce this fateful sentence !
His very pretty wife herself, Claudia Procula, interceded and tried to save this "just man", but he couldn't do anything. And that was the start of his personal marital drama.
Two days after, so before the man was executed, Claudia parted from him and left him abruptly as she was very angry. He thought she wanted to come back to Rome, as she was from the Imperial Family, and then to "Narbo Martius" (Narbonne, in Roman Gaul) where she was born.
The centurion who had to direct the public execution came to see him, and said that obviously the legs of this man would be broken as usually in this case. But the great Roman we are talking about, absolutely forbade him to do that. This unhappy story caused already enough damage in his personal life. He didn't want to hurt his wife more, if one day a reconciliation was possible.
He knew his wife had been extremely impressed by this innocent man, she saw as a luminous personality - just like him, by the way. And he was aware that Claudia had in between become very friendly with this wiseman's wife, Maria, a very beautiful woman too.
She wanted to learn more about them, their refreshing beliefs, and also their previous way of life.
Do you guess who is our character of the day, at this stage ? Not yet probably, but you feel it's coming !
After the death of this innocent, something extremely unusual happened. There was quickly rumors that this man had reappeared alive, and without any injury on the body (feet, hands, and flank), to his wife Maria first. This event was totally out of the blue !
The great Roman got to know about those news very swiftly, and his surrounders advised him to help extinguishing them. But he did exactly the opposite, with the secret hope the woman he loved would forgive him and come back to him, if she was learning the good news. He was then suddenly happy and trembling of joy. Yet, Claudia didn't come back, and he felt really sad and depressed.
In the background, he finally got to know she was comforting Maria, and wanted to help her leaving Judea for a safer shelter. And it's her who suggested her new friend to take refuge in the "Gaule Narbonnaise", her native region (founded in 118 BC as the most ancient Roman colony).
As a matter of fact, Maria knew some unexpected difficulties with a certain Simon, who was a previous friend of her husband. He wanted to take his succession, and was denying this role to her brother in law Jacob, and obviously to her as she was a woman.
Jacob happened to be murdered (by a certain Saul). Maria felt more than ever in danger for her life, and it was becoming urgent to leave.
Instead of preventing Maria to go, the great Roman, in the lasting hope to recover one day his wife Claudia, created for her discrete facilities to emigrate to the "Gaule Narbonnaise". And at the same time, fearing something bad may happen to her, he protected her in the shadow with his spies,
Finally, Maria was able to take a Roman boat. She thought this was due to the only help of Claudia but during the travel to "Gaule Narbonnaise", she realized that her husband was also involved in her rescue : she received indirectly from him a second purse for her extra-expenses.
After she landed in "Gaule Narbonnaise", Claudia rejoined her also.
They talked very long together and Maria asked her to forgive her husband, who was not a bad man. Claudia swept then about her past marital happiness.
Maria added that if her husband was forced by adverse circumstances to make a fault, he had done everything to repair it : that she could testify. And anyway, her innocent spouse was alive anew, so herself she had already forgiven him.
Hence her deepest wish, was they would reconciliate and come back together.
Claudia was touched in the heart by her appeasing words. And she felt stressed her beloved husband wasn't beside her. But unexpectedly, events helped Maria to grant her intimate wish.
As political troubles occurred in Judea, Claudia's husband who couldn't stop them, was called back to Rome... and exiled to "Gaule Narbonnaise" !
Strangely, a lot of historians took that as a great defeat for him... when it ended up to be on the contrary his greatest victory in life ! The resurrection of Jesus who was definitively married (Saint John, III-29) had provoked at the end a totally unexpected miracle : the passionate reconciliation of our mysterious character of the day with his wife Claudia. After languishing, they were reunited for good in total happiness !
As an epilog, because of the happy accident of this exile, our great Roman Pontius Pilatus, ex-prefect of Judea, could at last see again his beloved wife, Claudia Procula, who had forgiven him !
As a result, he even became one of the first "Christians" like his wife, according to Oriental Christian sources !
That's it, you got his name now. But we have the intuition you were already guessing who was our mysterious character of the day : "Ponce Pilate" in French !
You just didn't know who was Claudia Procula, and never imagined this Roman princess was a very early Christian, in what is presently the South of France !
And the other very important woman called Maria, who acclaimed to this reconciliation, was Maria Magdalena, Partner of Jesus-Christ : she effectively docked in the "Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer", and died in La Sainte Baume near "Massilia" (Marseille) years after !
Christianity has often taken unexpected paths to finally experience its rise in Rome, and throughout the world. Its beginnings are full of astonishing details, that most believers are still ignoring nowadays, two millenaries after.
The Coptic Church of Egypt, like the Ethiopian one are actually celebrating the "Couple Pilatus" every June 25th, as Christian saints, which seems to be almost totally ignored in the West.
But even Saint Paul (previously called Saul of Tarsus), who never showed any noticeable sympathy for Maria Magdalena, recognized in his writings the role played from the right beginning by great Roman ladies like Claudia - as he was calling her !
___________________________
Today, behind the title of this article, we are also aiming at talking about a very famous man worlwide.
You certainly know him, but the angle we have chosen to rediscover him will surprise you !
Try to guess whom we are writing about, by being revealed astonishing things concerning those extremely important women both for him and History, Maria and Claudia !
And get ready for amazing revelations !
*******
The story is starting in Palestine, at a time it was a Roman province.
An innocent man was sentenced to death the Roman way, for causing trouble to the Roman public order. The problem for the one who had to pronounce this penalty, was he was totally against death for this innocent. He didn't consider him at all as an enemy of Rome, but as a wise man. And he really tried his best to avoid this bad end.
At a moment, he truly thought the final choice he gave to the people would help him.
But no, adverse circumstances obliged him nolens volens to pronounce this fateful sentence !
His very pretty wife herself, Claudia Procula, interceded and tried to save this "just man", but he couldn't do anything. And that was the start of his personal marital drama.
Two days after, so before the man was executed, Claudia parted from him and left him abruptly as she was very angry. He thought she wanted to come back to Rome, as she was from the Imperial Family, and then to "Narbo Martius" (Narbonne, in Roman Gaul) where she was born.
The centurion who had to direct the public execution came to see him, and said that obviously the legs of this man would be broken as usually in this case. But the great Roman we are talking about, absolutely forbade him to do that. This unhappy story caused already enough damage in his personal life. He didn't want to hurt his wife more, if one day a reconciliation was possible.
He knew his wife had been extremely impressed by this innocent man, she saw as a luminous personality - just like him, by the way. And he was aware that Claudia had in between become very friendly with this wiseman's wife, Maria, a very beautiful woman too.
She wanted to learn more about them, their refreshing beliefs, and also their previous way of life.
Do you guess who is our character of the day, at this stage ? Not yet probably, but you feel it's coming !
After the death of this innocent, something extremely unusual happened. There was quickly rumors that this man had reappeared alive, and without any injury on the body (feet, hands, and flank), to his wife Maria first. This event was totally out of the blue !
The great Roman got to know about those news very swiftly, and his surrounders advised him to help extinguishing them. But he did exactly the opposite, with the secret hope the woman he loved would forgive him and come back to him, if she was learning the good news. He was then suddenly happy and trembling of joy. Yet, Claudia didn't come back, and he felt really sad and depressed.
In the background, he finally got to know she was comforting Maria, and wanted to help her leaving Judea for a safer shelter. And it's her who suggested her new friend to take refuge in the "Gaule Narbonnaise", her native region (founded in 118 BC as the most ancient Roman colony).
As a matter of fact, Maria knew some unexpected difficulties with a certain Simon, who was a previous friend of her husband. He wanted to take his succession, and was denying this role to her brother in law Jacob, and obviously to her as she was a woman.
Jacob happened to be murdered (by a certain Saul). Maria felt more than ever in danger for her life, and it was becoming urgent to leave.
Instead of preventing Maria to go, the great Roman, in the lasting hope to recover one day his wife Claudia, created for her discrete facilities to emigrate to the "Gaule Narbonnaise". And at the same time, fearing something bad may happen to her, he protected her in the shadow with his spies,
Finally, Maria was able to take a Roman boat. She thought this was due to the only help of Claudia but during the travel to "Gaule Narbonnaise", she realized that her husband was also involved in her rescue : she received indirectly from him a second purse for her extra-expenses.
After she landed in "Gaule Narbonnaise", Claudia rejoined her also.
They talked very long together and Maria asked her to forgive her husband, who was not a bad man. Claudia swept then about her past marital happiness.
Maria added that if her husband was forced by adverse circumstances to make a fault, he had done everything to repair it : that she could testify. And anyway, her innocent spouse was alive anew, so herself she had already forgiven him.
Hence her deepest wish, was they would reconciliate and come back together.
Claudia was touched in the heart by her appeasing words. And she felt stressed her beloved husband wasn't beside her. But unexpectedly, events helped Maria to grant her intimate wish.
As political troubles occurred in Judea, Claudia's husband who couldn't stop them, was called back to Rome... and exiled to "Gaule Narbonnaise" !
Strangely, a lot of historians took that as a great defeat for him... when it ended up to be on the contrary his greatest victory in life ! The resurrection of Jesus who was definitively married (Saint John, III-29) had provoked at the end a totally unexpected miracle : the passionate reconciliation of our mysterious character of the day with his wife Claudia. After languishing, they were reunited for good in total happiness !
As an epilog, because of the happy accident of this exile, our great Roman Pontius Pilatus, ex-prefect of Judea, could at last see again his beloved wife, Claudia Procula, who had forgiven him !
As a result, he even became one of the first "Christians" like his wife, according to Oriental Christian sources !
That's it, you got his name now. But we have the intuition you were already guessing who was our mysterious character of the day : "Ponce Pilate" in French !
You just didn't know who was Claudia Procula, and never imagined this Roman princess was a very early Christian, in what is presently the South of France !
And the other very important woman called Maria, who acclaimed to this reconciliation, was Maria Magdalena, Partner of Jesus-Christ : she effectively docked in the "Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer", and died in La Sainte Baume near "Massilia" (Marseille) years after !
Christianity has often taken unexpected paths to finally experience its rise in Rome, and throughout the world. Its beginnings are full of astonishing details, that most believers are still ignoring nowadays, two millenaries after.
The Coptic Church of Egypt, like the Ethiopian one are actually celebrating the "Couple Pilatus" every June 25th, as Christian saints, which seems to be almost totally ignored in the West.
But even Saint Paul (previously called Saul of Tarsus), who never showed any noticeable sympathy for Maria Magdalena, recognized in his writings the role played from the right beginning by great Roman ladies like Claudia - as he was calling her !
Friday, August 30, 2019
Uchronic history VI : in the Conciergerie Jail, a flower can hide another one !
by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D
___________________________
This new article may move you more than habitually, because today we are going to reveal key details about one of the most sensitive mysteries of History.
We don't intend to overwhelm you, but it may happen ! There are several parts in our article, so you can make a pause if you feel a bit shaky.
Today is the 226th birthday of this "only for your eyes" event, concerning Queen Marie-Antoinette and her uchronic escape from the Conciergerie Jail in Paris.
It involved not only the Baron de Batz as he was accused afterwards to have been his top organizer, but also several other unexpected actors in a very intricated and perilous situation.
By knowing some key elements which are going to be unveiled, you will make your own opinion about it, of course.
But first, get ready for something you absolutely never imagined this way !
******
A lot of people have read "The Knight of Maison Rouge", published by Alexandre Dumas in 1846. In this historical novel, after having failed to save the Queen in the Temple Jail in Paris, he was hiding at Dixmer house and still had the will to try to save her...
The real name of this Knight was Alexandre Gonsse De Rougeville (1761- 1814), who was a controversial character of the French Revolution. In fact, Dumas changed the name of "De Rougeville" in "De Maison Rouge" at his personal request.
But from the right beginning, there was an existing confusion between two historical characters : this man, and the Baron Jean de Batz (1754- 1822).
This confusion probably came from the operation of rescue of the Queen, in the Conciergerie Jail, which involved as top parallel organizer our lucky Baron, sometimes also called Jean-Pierre de Batz. We are talking about the tangle stamped "Carnation Conspiracy".
In this new jail the Queen was isolated, as her children and her sister-in-law, Madame Elisabeth (1764 - 1794) had remained in the Temple Jail, and were separated from her since August 2nd, 1793.
The actual cell showed to tourists in the Conciergerie Jail is not precisely hers, because the conformation of premises has been completely modified since.
Hardly concealed by a screen, the Queen was monitored day and night by two guards. Her only furniture were a cane armchair, two chairs, a simple table and a little bed.
Another confusion stemmed from the fact that the so-called "Carnation Conspiracy" ("Conspiration de l'Oeillet" in French), was mistakenly inflamed to the Baron de Batz.
In reality, the original idea came surprisingly from the Committee of Public Salute, for reasons of high politics.
Hence, it was just a manner to discredit more the Queen before her planned death, by using the unlucky and a bit naive De Rougeville : he would be struggling in dire straits for an illusion of startle.
But above all, it was a biased way to put an end to the legend of savior of the Baron de Batz, who wouldn't be able to do anything !
Let De Rougeville approach the Queen and propose her an escape, and lock noisily the game at the end, that was the crual and tortuous plan !
As a Master Spy, the Baron de Batz who was aware of the project of De Rougeville, smelt something was wrong in its conception : it looked short-sighted and far too easy. And it has to be added too, that he felt personaly challenged !
He knew this previous "Knight of the dagger" was certainly a man of action - yet rather impressionable and sometimes improvident. And he thought he was most likely maneuvered in that circumstance, by his compatriot of Arras : Maximilien de Robespierre (1758 - 1794). So he decided to trap the latter and his Committee, in their own fake "Carnation Conspiracy".
After all, it provided him the unexpected opportunity he was looking for to save the Queen, with a simple but awesome plan : short-circuiting the Committee, with an anticipated intervention, by using all the facilities artificially created by the same Committee for the success of the plan. Simultaneously, the advantage for him was that he would be faithful to his legend !
De Rougeville visited Marie-Antoinette on Wednesday, August 28th, 1793, with the Inspector of Prisons and Chief of Police Jean-Baptiste Michonis (1735 - 1794), who was also member of the Commune of Paris and lemonade producer. At this occasion, De Rougeville let drop on the floor a very little message from the two white carnations of his buttonhole proposing her to escape. So, very naturally, those flowers gave the name of the operation, which was in reality already hijacked by the Baron de Batz.
Yet, it doesn't appear De Rougeville was aware about it : he was taking De Batz for a very rich Royalist banker mainly, not a master of work. Anyhow, he thought he didn't need him as his savings (400 Louis d'Or and many assignats), looked sufficient in his eyes to buy the guards.
However, just before this surprising visit, the Queen Marie-Antoinette got to know De Batz was preparing something : it leaked from the words and change of attitude of her two proximate guards he had simply bought in this scarcity period, among other people. And she totally trusted him.
That's why she discretely noded De Rougeville, to show she accepted to escape this time.
On the same day, one of the guards told her to get ready for "the rehearsal of coming Friday night, at 11:30".
"The coming Friday night" was August 30th, 1793, and not the night of Monday 2 to Tuesday 3 September 1793, planned by De Rougeville and Michonis during their new visit of that day. She was a bit puzzled, but she thought one wanted to guarantee the success of the escape.
Anyhow, during that night she passed all the wickets without incident and even the exit giving on the proximate street. She was so delightly surprised to be able to make some steps out freely, in the obscurity !
When she wanted to return inside at the end of "the rehearsal", a woman hidden in the dark gently stopped her : she whispered in her ear to move away quietly by following her friend the Baron, beside her.
It was going to be Midnight. And this woman who looked very much like her and was dressed similarly, entered then in the Conciergerie Jail instead of her : she was Cornélia de Galéan, and was ready to give her life for the Queen.
The plan of genious of De Batz had been to graft his own intervention on the false "Carnation Conspiracy" of the Committee, by using cleverly the facilities created for the occasion. That's why he had proceeded to this Substitution with a Double, ahead of the De Rougeville and Michonis project.
At the same time, he had planned to let De Rougeville trying to save the fake Queen, Cornélia de Galéan. And if he was miraculously successful this time, at least she could be saved too, even she was ready to die instead of the Queen. This way, she would have stayed only three full days in the Conciergerie Jail !
On the night of Monday 2 to Tuesday 3 September 1793, De Rougeville and Michonis came back for their operation. Everything seemed totally all right ; they could pass all the wickets very easily with the prisoner, till the grid of the final exit. Next was the "rue de la Barillerie", now called "Boulevard du Palais" (since 1864), and ...Freedom.
But the guard suddenly changed his mind and prevented the fake Queen to get out.
De Rougeville and Michonis insisted to bring her out according to their plan, but he obstinately refused. Them they could go away together, but "the Citizen Capet" had to be taken back to her cell !
De Rougeville immediately thought he didn't give the guard enough money.
Anyhow, the fact is De Rougeville and Michonis gave up !
And, on September 3rd, 1793, this guard made a report of the incident to his superior, who informed in his turn the Committee of Public Salute. The so-called "Carnation Conspiracy" was brought to the light, even it was a fake, and the game seemed to be over.
That's also the reason the intervention of De Rougeville to save the Queen isn't properly considered as a true one by some historians, who are doubting about its reality.
They can, as if he had used force that night as he was usually doing, he could probably have gone out with the false Queen (so not the real Marie-Antoinette), and run away.
To his discharge for this second failure, it seems he had been completely screwed by the authoritarian attitude of the guard, which was so sudden and definitive.
To bring a conclusion, the last guard had just played to have been bought, according to the staging. And the Committee of Public Salute, after a quick checking, celebrated the failure of its fake "Carnation Conspiracy" with big laughs, totally certain that the Queen didn't escape !
The strange thing is De Batz was accused afterwards to have been his top organizer, and therefore neither the Committee obviously, nor De Rougeville directly. Yet Michonis, swiftly arrested about him as accomplice, will finish guillotined on June 17th, 1794.
And almost fourty days after the so-called "failure" of this hodgepodge, on October 12th, 1793, the prisoner was interrogated about her "betrayal" of the Nation and "her" son, and she was told abruptly she would be tried three days later, on October 15th, 1793.
Quickly sentenced to death, she was executed on October 16th, 1793 at 12 : 15, instead of the morning. As a matter of fact, Robespierre, Master of the Committee, wanted to avoid the annoying misadventure of January 21st, 1793, about the King and his last minute Rescuer along the "52 rue de Beauregard" in Paris, the Baron de Batz.
Yet to his great surprise, the Baron didn't appear and he really wondered why, by suddenly fearing having made a huge mistake !
He was right to think so, because Jean de Batz had no reason to intervene to save an already saved Queen !
The false "Carnation Conspiracy" had been in fact doubled very astutely by his anticipated operation of Deception : the "Counter-operation of the Two Carnations", where Robespierre and his followers had been completely done !
As a uchronic epilog, the second "Cornélia de Galéan, Marchioness of Janson" (1755 - 1834), aka Marie-Antoinette died naturally at 79 in Paris, when the Revolution was over, and Robespierre and his most proximate followers guillotined from a long time !
History can be so ironical sometimes !
Of course, it is up to you to think over and over this Black Op of the Baron de Batz, which was so amazing. But remember that a white carnation can easily hide another white carnation, for obvious reasons of success, when the honour and fame of a living legend are challenged !
"The Invisible Man" as Robespierre was nicknaming him, had struck again !
___________________________
This new article may move you more than habitually, because today we are going to reveal key details about one of the most sensitive mysteries of History.
We don't intend to overwhelm you, but it may happen ! There are several parts in our article, so you can make a pause if you feel a bit shaky.
Today is the 226th birthday of this "only for your eyes" event, concerning Queen Marie-Antoinette and her uchronic escape from the Conciergerie Jail in Paris.
It involved not only the Baron de Batz as he was accused afterwards to have been his top organizer, but also several other unexpected actors in a very intricated and perilous situation.
By knowing some key elements which are going to be unveiled, you will make your own opinion about it, of course.
But first, get ready for something you absolutely never imagined this way !
******
A lot of people have read "The Knight of Maison Rouge", published by Alexandre Dumas in 1846. In this historical novel, after having failed to save the Queen in the Temple Jail in Paris, he was hiding at Dixmer house and still had the will to try to save her...
The real name of this Knight was Alexandre Gonsse De Rougeville (1761- 1814), who was a controversial character of the French Revolution. In fact, Dumas changed the name of "De Rougeville" in "De Maison Rouge" at his personal request.
But from the right beginning, there was an existing confusion between two historical characters : this man, and the Baron Jean de Batz (1754- 1822).
This confusion probably came from the operation of rescue of the Queen, in the Conciergerie Jail, which involved as top parallel organizer our lucky Baron, sometimes also called Jean-Pierre de Batz. We are talking about the tangle stamped "Carnation Conspiracy".
In this new jail the Queen was isolated, as her children and her sister-in-law, Madame Elisabeth (1764 - 1794) had remained in the Temple Jail, and were separated from her since August 2nd, 1793.
The actual cell showed to tourists in the Conciergerie Jail is not precisely hers, because the conformation of premises has been completely modified since.
Hardly concealed by a screen, the Queen was monitored day and night by two guards. Her only furniture were a cane armchair, two chairs, a simple table and a little bed.
Another confusion stemmed from the fact that the so-called "Carnation Conspiracy" ("Conspiration de l'Oeillet" in French), was mistakenly inflamed to the Baron de Batz.
In reality, the original idea came surprisingly from the Committee of Public Salute, for reasons of high politics.
Hence, it was just a manner to discredit more the Queen before her planned death, by using the unlucky and a bit naive De Rougeville : he would be struggling in dire straits for an illusion of startle.
But above all, it was a biased way to put an end to the legend of savior of the Baron de Batz, who wouldn't be able to do anything !
Let De Rougeville approach the Queen and propose her an escape, and lock noisily the game at the end, that was the crual and tortuous plan !
As a Master Spy, the Baron de Batz who was aware of the project of De Rougeville, smelt something was wrong in its conception : it looked short-sighted and far too easy. And it has to be added too, that he felt personaly challenged !
He knew this previous "Knight of the dagger" was certainly a man of action - yet rather impressionable and sometimes improvident. And he thought he was most likely maneuvered in that circumstance, by his compatriot of Arras : Maximilien de Robespierre (1758 - 1794). So he decided to trap the latter and his Committee, in their own fake "Carnation Conspiracy".
After all, it provided him the unexpected opportunity he was looking for to save the Queen, with a simple but awesome plan : short-circuiting the Committee, with an anticipated intervention, by using all the facilities artificially created by the same Committee for the success of the plan. Simultaneously, the advantage for him was that he would be faithful to his legend !
De Rougeville visited Marie-Antoinette on Wednesday, August 28th, 1793, with the Inspector of Prisons and Chief of Police Jean-Baptiste Michonis (1735 - 1794), who was also member of the Commune of Paris and lemonade producer. At this occasion, De Rougeville let drop on the floor a very little message from the two white carnations of his buttonhole proposing her to escape. So, very naturally, those flowers gave the name of the operation, which was in reality already hijacked by the Baron de Batz.
Yet, it doesn't appear De Rougeville was aware about it : he was taking De Batz for a very rich Royalist banker mainly, not a master of work. Anyhow, he thought he didn't need him as his savings (400 Louis d'Or and many assignats), looked sufficient in his eyes to buy the guards.
However, just before this surprising visit, the Queen Marie-Antoinette got to know De Batz was preparing something : it leaked from the words and change of attitude of her two proximate guards he had simply bought in this scarcity period, among other people. And she totally trusted him.
That's why she discretely noded De Rougeville, to show she accepted to escape this time.
On the same day, one of the guards told her to get ready for "the rehearsal of coming Friday night, at 11:30".
"The coming Friday night" was August 30th, 1793, and not the night of Monday 2 to Tuesday 3 September 1793, planned by De Rougeville and Michonis during their new visit of that day. She was a bit puzzled, but she thought one wanted to guarantee the success of the escape.
Anyhow, during that night she passed all the wickets without incident and even the exit giving on the proximate street. She was so delightly surprised to be able to make some steps out freely, in the obscurity !
When she wanted to return inside at the end of "the rehearsal", a woman hidden in the dark gently stopped her : she whispered in her ear to move away quietly by following her friend the Baron, beside her.
It was going to be Midnight. And this woman who looked very much like her and was dressed similarly, entered then in the Conciergerie Jail instead of her : she was Cornélia de Galéan, and was ready to give her life for the Queen.
The plan of genious of De Batz had been to graft his own intervention on the false "Carnation Conspiracy" of the Committee, by using cleverly the facilities created for the occasion. That's why he had proceeded to this Substitution with a Double, ahead of the De Rougeville and Michonis project.
At the same time, he had planned to let De Rougeville trying to save the fake Queen, Cornélia de Galéan. And if he was miraculously successful this time, at least she could be saved too, even she was ready to die instead of the Queen. This way, she would have stayed only three full days in the Conciergerie Jail !
On the night of Monday 2 to Tuesday 3 September 1793, De Rougeville and Michonis came back for their operation. Everything seemed totally all right ; they could pass all the wickets very easily with the prisoner, till the grid of the final exit. Next was the "rue de la Barillerie", now called "Boulevard du Palais" (since 1864), and ...Freedom.
But the guard suddenly changed his mind and prevented the fake Queen to get out.
De Rougeville and Michonis insisted to bring her out according to their plan, but he obstinately refused. Them they could go away together, but "the Citizen Capet" had to be taken back to her cell !
De Rougeville immediately thought he didn't give the guard enough money.
Anyhow, the fact is De Rougeville and Michonis gave up !
And, on September 3rd, 1793, this guard made a report of the incident to his superior, who informed in his turn the Committee of Public Salute. The so-called "Carnation Conspiracy" was brought to the light, even it was a fake, and the game seemed to be over.
That's also the reason the intervention of De Rougeville to save the Queen isn't properly considered as a true one by some historians, who are doubting about its reality.
They can, as if he had used force that night as he was usually doing, he could probably have gone out with the false Queen (so not the real Marie-Antoinette), and run away.
To his discharge for this second failure, it seems he had been completely screwed by the authoritarian attitude of the guard, which was so sudden and definitive.
To bring a conclusion, the last guard had just played to have been bought, according to the staging. And the Committee of Public Salute, after a quick checking, celebrated the failure of its fake "Carnation Conspiracy" with big laughs, totally certain that the Queen didn't escape !
The strange thing is De Batz was accused afterwards to have been his top organizer, and therefore neither the Committee obviously, nor De Rougeville directly. Yet Michonis, swiftly arrested about him as accomplice, will finish guillotined on June 17th, 1794.
And almost fourty days after the so-called "failure" of this hodgepodge, on October 12th, 1793, the prisoner was interrogated about her "betrayal" of the Nation and "her" son, and she was told abruptly she would be tried three days later, on October 15th, 1793.
Quickly sentenced to death, she was executed on October 16th, 1793 at 12 : 15, instead of the morning. As a matter of fact, Robespierre, Master of the Committee, wanted to avoid the annoying misadventure of January 21st, 1793, about the King and his last minute Rescuer along the "52 rue de Beauregard" in Paris, the Baron de Batz.
Yet to his great surprise, the Baron didn't appear and he really wondered why, by suddenly fearing having made a huge mistake !
He was right to think so, because Jean de Batz had no reason to intervene to save an already saved Queen !
The false "Carnation Conspiracy" had been in fact doubled very astutely by his anticipated operation of Deception : the "Counter-operation of the Two Carnations", where Robespierre and his followers had been completely done !
As a uchronic epilog, the second "Cornélia de Galéan, Marchioness of Janson" (1755 - 1834), aka Marie-Antoinette died naturally at 79 in Paris, when the Revolution was over, and Robespierre and his most proximate followers guillotined from a long time !
History can be so ironical sometimes !
Of course, it is up to you to think over and over this Black Op of the Baron de Batz, which was so amazing. But remember that a white carnation can easily hide another white carnation, for obvious reasons of success, when the honour and fame of a living legend are challenged !
"The Invisible Man" as Robespierre was nicknaming him, had struck again !
Friday, August 2, 2019
Uchronic history V : De Batz-Boissy d'Anglas, an overlooked friendship !
by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D
___________________________
Today, we are going to bring some new elements about the best kept secrets of the French Revolution. In those circumstances, it is important to link the Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) to another brave man of the Revolution epoch, the Count François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas (1756 - 1826).
Both were MPs at the edge of the Revolution : the first one represented the Nobility of Nérac (South West), and the second one the Third Estate of Annonay (South East).
When De Batz as President of the Liquidation Committee of the Constituent concluded that a certain Mr Sérier, head of the Water Company of Paris was owing 20 million French pounds to the King's treasury, the next one applauded. He meant that the administrator Sérier should have paid this amount to alleviate the French Debt.
Don't forget the origin of the convocation of the States-Generals for May 1789 by the King, was directly connected to the French Debt crisis !
In January 1793, as a MP of Convention this time, Boissy d'Anglas was bold enough to vote against the death of the King Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), wickedly nicknamed "Louis the last one" ("Louis le dernier" in French). And the Baron de Batz was impressed a lot by his risky braveness, in a so exceptional situation.
The Count Boissy d'Anglas was a moderate protestant attached to the freedom of religion. Beyond their small religious difference, him and De Batz were united in the same beliefs of true Justice, Free speech, and Freedom in the Christian way.
Jean de Batz remembered his ancestor Manaud III de Batz saved in 1577, with three other men, the life of Henri of Navarra (1553 - 1610), a protestant at that time when he entered the town of Eause (Duchy of Albret). This happened before the latter founded the dynasty of Bourbons, Kings of France and Navarra, under the name of Henri IV.
___________________________
Today, we are going to bring some new elements about the best kept secrets of the French Revolution. In those circumstances, it is important to link the Baron Jean de Batz (1754 - 1822) to another brave man of the Revolution epoch, the Count François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas (1756 - 1826).
Both were MPs at the edge of the Revolution : the first one represented the Nobility of Nérac (South West), and the second one the Third Estate of Annonay (South East).
When De Batz as President of the Liquidation Committee of the Constituent concluded that a certain Mr Sérier, head of the Water Company of Paris was owing 20 million French pounds to the King's treasury, the next one applauded. He meant that the administrator Sérier should have paid this amount to alleviate the French Debt.
Don't forget the origin of the convocation of the States-Generals for May 1789 by the King, was directly connected to the French Debt crisis !
In January 1793, as a MP of Convention this time, Boissy d'Anglas was bold enough to vote against the death of the King Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?), wickedly nicknamed "Louis the last one" ("Louis le dernier" in French). And the Baron de Batz was impressed a lot by his risky braveness, in a so exceptional situation.
The Count Boissy d'Anglas was a moderate protestant attached to the freedom of religion. Beyond their small religious difference, him and De Batz were united in the same beliefs of true Justice, Free speech, and Freedom in the Christian way.
Jean de Batz remembered his ancestor Manaud III de Batz saved in 1577, with three other men, the life of Henri of Navarra (1553 - 1610), a protestant at that time when he entered the town of Eause (Duchy of Albret). This happened before the latter founded the dynasty of Bourbons, Kings of France and Navarra, under the name of Henri IV.
You know already important details about the Baron Jean de Batz, through our previous articles. So you are informed, he launched a very bold operation of rescue of the King with a double, along the 52 rue de Beauregard in Paris, near Boulevard Bonne Nouvelle, and could escape not alone (Morning of January 21st, 1793).
Tuesday, July 2, 2019
Just science-fiction XXXVIII : embarking for Mars on Diego Garcia island, at last resort !
by Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Doctor in Economic Geography, Ph. D
___________________________
Today, we are still going to follow Andromedan sources about travels to Mars (from Diego Garcia island), after studying the various options usually offered for this purpose.
Of course, this article has to be taken like usually as "Just science-fiction", which is the generic title of our mascot series.
********
Going to Mars is considered as extremely difficult at the moment, from a scientific point of view. It 's the target of NASA since the Mission Apollo 11, the successful landing of Neil Armstrong (1930 - 2012) and Buzz Aldrin (born in 1930) on the Moon (July 20th, 1969), and their first steps on its surface (July 21th, 1969).
As a rare moment of non fiction in this article, we want to stress that we appreciated to be able to meet Buzz Aldrin in Amiens (France) in 1990, and ask him questions about the latter Mission : this happened at the occasion of a special event dedicated to the writer of "From Earth to Moon", Jules Verne (1828 - 1905).
Officially, for the first inhabited travel to Mars, people will have to wait for a date which is always changing : 2030, 2033...or after.
The journey should last around 2 years, with some variations according to the scenario finally chosen (direct or semi-direct). The stay would be between 30 and 550 days, and the return would last between 180 and 430 days, depending on the technology and period of the year chosen (scenario of opposition or conjunction).
So it's obvious only hardly trained people, would be able to accomplish this kind of travel - whatever they are men or women.
For Orientals, it's not as complicated as that, if you are using individually your "etheric body" through meditation. Tapping into the "Substantia nigra" of the back of our brain is both easy, if you let it go, or complicated at the opposite when you want to make strenuous efforts. Using our multidimensional self, is not something as natural for Earthlings as for Andromedans. The key to unlock it is to be able to feel real empathy.
So this technique is not easily mastered, except you are doing it when sleeping in the form of "real dreams". But it's usuallly considered as a subjective experiment, connected to your imagination and not to reality, which is disputable.
And the possibilities offered by a mantra like the one of John Carter : "OC AUREM OCTE WIZZ..." are in a way alike. In addition, you need a special necklace of the Ancients of BARSOOM (Mars), to make the teleportation possible.
If it happened unexpectedly to work by itself without this technology (reason why we chose not to give the mantra in full), the problem would be then to be able to come back to Earth safely. Thus, you should better know the name of Earth in Martian language, to be able to reverse the travel : "JASSOOM" !
A proximate and overlooked potentiality, could be opened also to some top specialists of the Japanese Reiki (i.e. "Universal Energy", like the "Od" of God Thor, son of God Odin in Viking religion). But, did they realize about it ?
Surprisingly...the Jesuits, who are Catholics, are not the least ! It's not known if the special mantra of the Emperor starting with Daï..." when prepared, can be used alone or in a secret combination with another one to render possible the travel to Mars for instance, and return of course.
Reiki in its essence is very much connected to Ryobu-Shinto, and not at all to Cartesianism. That's why, it may appear esoteric, magical, or even miraculous to Western eyes. And Jesuits are very naturally interested a lot in its miraculous aspects, if they surprisingly happen.
Obviously, this applies only to traditional Reiki ["Reiki Usui" from the founder, Usui Mikao (1865 - 1926)], not to the Western one - often amputated of mantras : the latter is frequently presented as more down-to-Earth... and almost "cartesian" paradoxically (ending to be just a variant of Rolfing in Psychotherapy).
At the end, beside the "Stargate option" or the use of a Sarcophagus from "Cairo" (which means "Mars" in Old Egyptian) for what is known , the most basic choice would be to embark from a base made for that.
So then, as the last resort, you would have to have been selected for the secret program of NSA, which started from 1957. The experimental embarkment "harbor" was Diego Garcia island in the Indian Ocean, South of the Maldives. The Greys would have chosen it for its exceptional situation on Earth, according to Andromedan sources. And success arose in 1959 with the first NSA ultra-secret landing on Mars.
Diego Garcia island is British and separated officially from the archipelago of Chagos (previously connected to Mauritius when a colony) since 1965, with the creation of British Indian Ocean Territory. And UK allowed from a long time now Americans to use it at discretion.
The results would have been so encouraging, that a British-US facility was created in 1971, and became a full base between 1977 and 1986.
With such an establishment on its ground, UK can benefit from this terrestrial "Aircraft carrier", so strategic also for the Persian Gulf area, by saving costs.
And circular travels with the Red planet would be mainly using the same base, with all its modern facilities nowadays.
As we can see, Cape Kennedy is not used at the moment for any inhabited travel to Mars. However, It should happen with the inhabited Orion mission, from 2030.
In fact the ex-Cape Canaveral is a NASA rocket launching site, when Diego Garcia would just be an NSA secret launching site. The situation of Diego Garcia island in the Indian Ocean is allowing an optimization of launchings, due to the inclination angle of Earth : months can be saved on the journey thanks to the Earth curveture.
Often, we hear that NASA didn't know this or that. But it could be true, if there was from the right beginning a compartmentalization of spatial conquest.
Just a few days ago (on June 23rd, 2019), NASA connected the sudden Methane emissions on Mars discovered by its robot Curiosity to "living things", by reactivating carefully the question of life on the Red planet. And the peak Methane emission recorded unexpectedly five days before, is likely due to the rock-water interactions.
Nowadays, a lot of interesting things are discovered about Mars, and new hypothesis are arising. If life is often underground with an artificial atmosphere, it's not always the case.
For instance, it seems you don't need a special equipment to be able to breathe when you are in the Equator of Mars, at the difference of its South or North Poles - if following again Andromedan sources. Of course, you still have to be careful with your body : running or jogging can be fatal. But knowing you can live in the open air over there, by adopting a moderate pace for once, is really incredible, isn't it ?
To broaden the field of possibilities, the question of the pyramids of Cydonia on Mars (or elsewhere in fact) for teleportation, is not neutral. And the same could be true of obelisks spread among important capitals on Earth : those symbolic figurations in granite of the virile member of the green God Osiris - finally refound by his wife, Goddess Isis -, and covered with a gold-leaf Pyramidion, are said to favour rebirth, important risings, and also to counter financial upheavals.
To open their inner spatio-temporal vortex, you need to find a great priest of the antic but still living religion of Amon-Ra : their concealed engineering dating back to the pharaonic times, can be unlocked only by specialists !
___________________________
Today, we are still going to follow Andromedan sources about travels to Mars (from Diego Garcia island), after studying the various options usually offered for this purpose.
Of course, this article has to be taken like usually as "Just science-fiction", which is the generic title of our mascot series.
********
Going to Mars is considered as extremely difficult at the moment, from a scientific point of view. It 's the target of NASA since the Mission Apollo 11, the successful landing of Neil Armstrong (1930 - 2012) and Buzz Aldrin (born in 1930) on the Moon (July 20th, 1969), and their first steps on its surface (July 21th, 1969).
As a rare moment of non fiction in this article, we want to stress that we appreciated to be able to meet Buzz Aldrin in Amiens (France) in 1990, and ask him questions about the latter Mission : this happened at the occasion of a special event dedicated to the writer of "From Earth to Moon", Jules Verne (1828 - 1905).
Officially, for the first inhabited travel to Mars, people will have to wait for a date which is always changing : 2030, 2033...or after.
The journey should last around 2 years, with some variations according to the scenario finally chosen (direct or semi-direct). The stay would be between 30 and 550 days, and the return would last between 180 and 430 days, depending on the technology and period of the year chosen (scenario of opposition or conjunction).
So it's obvious only hardly trained people, would be able to accomplish this kind of travel - whatever they are men or women.
For Orientals, it's not as complicated as that, if you are using individually your "etheric body" through meditation. Tapping into the "Substantia nigra" of the back of our brain is both easy, if you let it go, or complicated at the opposite when you want to make strenuous efforts. Using our multidimensional self, is not something as natural for Earthlings as for Andromedans. The key to unlock it is to be able to feel real empathy.
So this technique is not easily mastered, except you are doing it when sleeping in the form of "real dreams". But it's usuallly considered as a subjective experiment, connected to your imagination and not to reality, which is disputable.
And the possibilities offered by a mantra like the one of John Carter : "OC AUREM OCTE WIZZ..." are in a way alike. In addition, you need a special necklace of the Ancients of BARSOOM (Mars), to make the teleportation possible.
If it happened unexpectedly to work by itself without this technology (reason why we chose not to give the mantra in full), the problem would be then to be able to come back to Earth safely. Thus, you should better know the name of Earth in Martian language, to be able to reverse the travel : "JASSOOM" !
A proximate and overlooked potentiality, could be opened also to some top specialists of the Japanese Reiki (i.e. "Universal Energy", like the "Od" of God Thor, son of God Odin in Viking religion). But, did they realize about it ?
Surprisingly...the Jesuits, who are Catholics, are not the least ! It's not known if the special mantra of the Emperor starting with Daï..." when prepared, can be used alone or in a secret combination with another one to render possible the travel to Mars for instance, and return of course.
Reiki in its essence is very much connected to Ryobu-Shinto, and not at all to Cartesianism. That's why, it may appear esoteric, magical, or even miraculous to Western eyes. And Jesuits are very naturally interested a lot in its miraculous aspects, if they surprisingly happen.
Obviously, this applies only to traditional Reiki ["Reiki Usui" from the founder, Usui Mikao (1865 - 1926)], not to the Western one - often amputated of mantras : the latter is frequently presented as more down-to-Earth... and almost "cartesian" paradoxically (ending to be just a variant of Rolfing in Psychotherapy).
At the end, beside the "Stargate option" or the use of a Sarcophagus from "Cairo" (which means "Mars" in Old Egyptian) for what is known , the most basic choice would be to embark from a base made for that.
So then, as the last resort, you would have to have been selected for the secret program of NSA, which started from 1957. The experimental embarkment "harbor" was Diego Garcia island in the Indian Ocean, South of the Maldives. The Greys would have chosen it for its exceptional situation on Earth, according to Andromedan sources. And success arose in 1959 with the first NSA ultra-secret landing on Mars.
Diego Garcia island is British and separated officially from the archipelago of Chagos (previously connected to Mauritius when a colony) since 1965, with the creation of British Indian Ocean Territory. And UK allowed from a long time now Americans to use it at discretion.
The results would have been so encouraging, that a British-US facility was created in 1971, and became a full base between 1977 and 1986.
With such an establishment on its ground, UK can benefit from this terrestrial "Aircraft carrier", so strategic also for the Persian Gulf area, by saving costs.
And circular travels with the Red planet would be mainly using the same base, with all its modern facilities nowadays.
As we can see, Cape Kennedy is not used at the moment for any inhabited travel to Mars. However, It should happen with the inhabited Orion mission, from 2030.
In fact the ex-Cape Canaveral is a NASA rocket launching site, when Diego Garcia would just be an NSA secret launching site. The situation of Diego Garcia island in the Indian Ocean is allowing an optimization of launchings, due to the inclination angle of Earth : months can be saved on the journey thanks to the Earth curveture.
Often, we hear that NASA didn't know this or that. But it could be true, if there was from the right beginning a compartmentalization of spatial conquest.
Just a few days ago (on June 23rd, 2019), NASA connected the sudden Methane emissions on Mars discovered by its robot Curiosity to "living things", by reactivating carefully the question of life on the Red planet. And the peak Methane emission recorded unexpectedly five days before, is likely due to the rock-water interactions.
Nowadays, a lot of interesting things are discovered about Mars, and new hypothesis are arising. If life is often underground with an artificial atmosphere, it's not always the case.
For instance, it seems you don't need a special equipment to be able to breathe when you are in the Equator of Mars, at the difference of its South or North Poles - if following again Andromedan sources. Of course, you still have to be careful with your body : running or jogging can be fatal. But knowing you can live in the open air over there, by adopting a moderate pace for once, is really incredible, isn't it ?
To broaden the field of possibilities, the question of the pyramids of Cydonia on Mars (or elsewhere in fact) for teleportation, is not neutral. And the same could be true of obelisks spread among important capitals on Earth : those symbolic figurations in granite of the virile member of the green God Osiris - finally refound by his wife, Goddess Isis -, and covered with a gold-leaf Pyramidion, are said to favour rebirth, important risings, and also to counter financial upheavals.
To open their inner spatio-temporal vortex, you need to find a great priest of the antic but still living religion of Amon-Ra : their concealed engineering dating back to the pharaonic times, can be unlocked only by specialists !
Saturday, June 1, 2019
Storia u-cronaca IV : il Barone de Batz, al di là insonnias, fortuna e adulazione !
per Jean-Jacques COURTEY, Dottore in Geografia Economica, Ph. D
tradotto ed adattato dell' inglese all' italiano per se
___________________________
C'é un complemento speciale da nostro articolo intitolato "Uchronic history II : the greatest shams of history", pubblicato in "Global Politics and Economics", il 1 juglio 2018.
In quest'ultimo articolo, il Barone de Batz (1754 - 1822) era un personaggio centrale e un conduttore di eventi capitali durante la Rivoluzione Francese, con il suo uso di doppie - anche le persone sono spesso tenuti nell'ignoranza su di esso. Hanno solo sentito di solito, era dalla famiglia di D'Artagnan.
A questo proposito, abbiamo studiato le due operazioni segrete di salvataggio del Re Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?) e della Regina Marie-Antoinette ( 1755 - 1793 ?), che i Revoluzionari attribuiscono alla sua persona audace, anche lui sorprendentemente sempre negato qualsiasi partecipazione in loro.
******
In "La révolution fracassée" (che puo` essere tradotto da "La Rivoluzione fracassata" in italiano) pubblicato in 2013 - Ed. Actes Sud - , Paul Belaiche-Daninos ha sottolineato alcuni particulari sul Barone de Batz. E ha intrapreso il suo libro "La justice du baron de Batz" ("La giustizia del Barone de Batz").
Ha dimostrato che nostro Barone ha cercato come deputato di influenzare il voto, per evitare a Louis XVI la pena di morte nel gennaio 1793. In questa occazione, tre parlementari gli hanno promesso di non votare la morte : Le Peletier de Saint Fargeau, Vergniaud, e il cugino del Re ("Philippe-Egalité", Duca di Orléans).
Ma in realtà, tutti loro hanno fatto esattamente il contrario. che causato la rabbia del Barone e la sua volontà di vendetta : egli avrebbe immediatamente deciso di rendere giustizia su di loro, come punizione inevitabile anche !
Per fare un commento se seguendo questa logica, quei trei personaggi hanno commesso uno spergiuro disonorevole agli occhi del Barone. Come un nobiluomo de regime antico, fortemente ha odiato la gente che non ha avuta parola.
Non sorprendre che i tres si sarebbero sentiti rapidamente a disagio e preoccupati, anche se non riuscivano ad immaginare come avrebbe agito.
Comunque bisogna notare che tutto è stato completato lo stesso anno, 1793 !
Louis-Michel Le Peletier de Saint Fargeau (1760 - 1793) è stato ferito mortalmente da una vecchia guardia di Louis XVI chiamata "Parigi" il 20 gennaio 1793, appena sedici ore dopo il suo ultimo voto fatidico contro il Re. Coincidenza o no, non ha nemmeno avuto il tempo di andare a dormire per fare une vero incubo !
Pierre Vergniaud (1753 - 1793), l'uomo che ha sospesso i poteri del Re il 10 agosto 1792, fini`per opporsi a Danton che vedeva come un potenziale dittatore : questa idea fortemente suggerita da de Batz lo porta rapidamente alla ghigliottina (30 ottobre 1793) !
Ed infine, il duca di Orléans (1747 - 1793) sperimento` la caduta, dopo l'accusa di tradimento lanciata contro Dumouriez (1739 - 1823) e i suoi sostenitori.
Di fatto, il Barone de Batz è stato capace di intrigare questa accusa come lui stesso era stato tradito da Dumouriez.
Questo non gli aveva portato il sostegno dei suoi uomini finalmente, la mattina del 21 gennaio 1793, su Boulevard Bonne Nouvelle a Parigi. E aveva costretto de Batz a procedere ancora un po`più lontano, nonostante i 12.000 uomini armati di fucili a baionetta del cordone di sicurezza, con l'operazione di salvataggio del Re : lungo il numero 52 rue de Beauregard ! Tuttavia, fu aiutato dalle particolarità di questa strada stretta e ripida nell'angolo, in cui la berlina del Re fu costretta a ralentare e frenare. Salto` immediatamente le caccole della berlina che apri` con qualcuno di "speciale", e scappo` molto rapidamente da un passagio ancora esistente accanto a questo numero, con un uomo che le guardie non riuscivano ad indovinare se era il Re e non il suo sosia, nella confuzione !
Interessante anche, va ricordato il nostro Barone è nato nel castello di Gouts (Landes, Aquitaine) !
Dumouriez che diventato sospetto per la Convenzione il 4 aprile 1793, potrebbe fuggire correndo nei campi. Ma non fu cosi`per "Philippe-Egalité" ("Phîlippe-Uguaglianza") che fu arrestato tre giorni dopo, e infine condannato a morte e ghigliottinato il 6 novembre 1793.
Vogliamo sottolineare que tutti hanno riconosciuto le capacità e l'incredibile coraggio del Barone de Batz, compresi i Revoluzionari. Gli ultimi rimasero senza parole, di fronte alla sua eroica audacia di uomo che non puo` morire !
Come abbiamo scritto prima, conosciamo solo le sue due operazioni di soccorso ultra-pericolose riguardanti Louis XVI e Marie-Antoinette a causa dei suoi nemici, come lui sempre li nego` nonostante tutte le prove.
Per fare un importante parallelo, grandi misteri sono stati fatti per troppo tempo intorno alla sostituzione del loro figlio, Louis XVII (1785 - 1860)...con il figlio ritardato del Marchese de Jarjayes nella prigione di Temple il 19 gennaio 1794 dal Conte di Courtenay - un parente del Re d'Inghilterra - e la sua assistente polposa, la gracioza signorina Barett (Servizi Segreti Britannici).
Ed è certo che per più di due secoli, ha permesso che le fini nebulose di Louis XVI e Marie-Antoinette non fossero studiate più attentamente, aiutando la creazione di una mitologia discutibile.
Tornando al Barone Jean de Batz (a volte chiamato "Jean-Pierre de Batz"), era estremamente intelligente, giocato d'astuzia...e fortunato. Molte volte avrebbe dovuto farsi intrapolare da Robespierre, ma poteva sempre fuggire grazie alla sua grande arte dell'improvvisazione.
Come un'anguilla scivolava sempre tra le goffe dita di Robespierre.
Si sa che era anche responsabile delle sue insonnie !
E fino alla fine Massimiliano ebbe incubi a causa sua : durante la Rivoluzione, solo Jean de Batz era in grado di causarli questo costante stress. Era la sua bestia nera !
Ricordiamo che Jean de Batz era Colonnello nell'esercito di Louis XVI (Luigi XVI), e che poteva contare sul suo piccolo esercito di 2.000 uomini sparsi nella regione Parigina. E questo è senza contare gli agenti e i correspondenti che teneva in tutta la Francia e all'estero, da quando era Segretario del Gabinetto Nero del Re (cosi` il Capo dei Servizi Segreti del Re) !
Durante il Terrore, fu abbastanza intelligente e audace per avere incontri molto discreti con la gente della Commune di Parigi, la Convenzione...e anche alcuni membri del Comitato di Publicca Sicurezza [Claude Basire (1764 - 1794), Delaunay D'angers (1752 - 1794), e il fortunato Julien de Toulouse (1750 - 1828)]. Non stupefacente che Robespierre ha fatto incubi, e quasi "l'insonnia di giorno" su qualcuno che segretamente lo stava provocando - praticamente sotto il suo naso !
Alla fine della Rivoluzione, durante il 13 Vendémiaire, anno IV (5 ottobre 1795), Jean de Batz fu sospettato di essere il cervello della Rivolta Monarchica.
Quest'ultima fu ufficialmente schiacciata dall'artiglieria di Napoléon Bonaparte (1769 - 1821), nella parte anteriore della chiesa di Saint Roch a Parigi.
E questa volta, de Batz fu catturato come l'organizzatore superiore da dietro.
Eppure, nessuno sa come sia riuscito esattamente...ma è stato rilasciato piuttosto velocemente, e tutte le accuse sono state abbandonate contro di lui. Si dice comunque la sua futura moglie, Mademoiselle Thilorier, e una amica, la "Marchesa di Janson" di cui abbiamo parlato nel nostro precedente articolo (come possible nome di copertina di fuga per la Regina Marie-Antoinette) le hanno aiutato discretamente...cosi` nessuna prova materiale circa la sua implicazione in questa Insurrezione potrebbe essere trovata !
Alla fine del nostro sviluppo, è ovvio che il Barone de Batz fu un attore importante della Storia Francese, anche solo poche persone hanno studato i suoi resultati più audaci.
Per essere comprensivi, dobbiamo anche menzionare i suoi innegabili colpi di fortuna, e anche la sua buona fortuna con le donne !
Fu adulato dalla sua futura moglie e dalla "Marchesa di Janson", che lo considerava come l'Uomo in tutto il suo splendore, dignoso dei più grandi Eroi dell'Antichità : la prima, per amore e passione, e la seconda con una devota amicizia perché gli aveva salvato la vita da una morte orribile e ignobile.
Va agiunto, che l'Insurrezione sopra citata non aveva realmente fallita : l'obbietivo del Barone de Batz era sempre stato quello di portare questa Rivoluzione - vista come innganevole e inhumana - una fine. Ed è esattamente quello che è successo tre settimane dopo con un nuovo regime sorprendente, che sembra provenire dal nulla : il "Direttorio" (26 ottobre 1795 - 10 novembre 1799) !
E c'è qualche cosa di buffo, nel fatto che Jean de Batz sia stato possibilmente aiutato e protetto...dalla Regina di Francia (alias la "Marchesa di Janson") per terminare la Rivoluzione !
tradotto ed adattato dell' inglese all' italiano per se
___________________________
C'é un complemento speciale da nostro articolo intitolato "Uchronic history II : the greatest shams of history", pubblicato in "Global Politics and Economics", il 1 juglio 2018.
In quest'ultimo articolo, il Barone de Batz (1754 - 1822) era un personaggio centrale e un conduttore di eventi capitali durante la Rivoluzione Francese, con il suo uso di doppie - anche le persone sono spesso tenuti nell'ignoranza su di esso. Hanno solo sentito di solito, era dalla famiglia di D'Artagnan.
A questo proposito, abbiamo studiato le due operazioni segrete di salvataggio del Re Louis XVI (1754 - 1793 ?) e della Regina Marie-Antoinette ( 1755 - 1793 ?), che i Revoluzionari attribuiscono alla sua persona audace, anche lui sorprendentemente sempre negato qualsiasi partecipazione in loro.
******
In "La révolution fracassée" (che puo` essere tradotto da "La Rivoluzione fracassata" in italiano) pubblicato in 2013 - Ed. Actes Sud - , Paul Belaiche-Daninos ha sottolineato alcuni particulari sul Barone de Batz. E ha intrapreso il suo libro "La justice du baron de Batz" ("La giustizia del Barone de Batz").
Ha dimostrato che nostro Barone ha cercato come deputato di influenzare il voto, per evitare a Louis XVI la pena di morte nel gennaio 1793. In questa occazione, tre parlementari gli hanno promesso di non votare la morte : Le Peletier de Saint Fargeau, Vergniaud, e il cugino del Re ("Philippe-Egalité", Duca di Orléans).
Ma in realtà, tutti loro hanno fatto esattamente il contrario. che causato la rabbia del Barone e la sua volontà di vendetta : egli avrebbe immediatamente deciso di rendere giustizia su di loro, come punizione inevitabile anche !
Per fare un commento se seguendo questa logica, quei trei personaggi hanno commesso uno spergiuro disonorevole agli occhi del Barone. Come un nobiluomo de regime antico, fortemente ha odiato la gente che non ha avuta parola.
Non sorprendre che i tres si sarebbero sentiti rapidamente a disagio e preoccupati, anche se non riuscivano ad immaginare come avrebbe agito.
Comunque bisogna notare che tutto è stato completato lo stesso anno, 1793 !
Louis-Michel Le Peletier de Saint Fargeau (1760 - 1793) è stato ferito mortalmente da una vecchia guardia di Louis XVI chiamata "Parigi" il 20 gennaio 1793, appena sedici ore dopo il suo ultimo voto fatidico contro il Re. Coincidenza o no, non ha nemmeno avuto il tempo di andare a dormire per fare une vero incubo !
Pierre Vergniaud (1753 - 1793), l'uomo che ha sospesso i poteri del Re il 10 agosto 1792, fini`per opporsi a Danton che vedeva come un potenziale dittatore : questa idea fortemente suggerita da de Batz lo porta rapidamente alla ghigliottina (30 ottobre 1793) !
Ed infine, il duca di Orléans (1747 - 1793) sperimento` la caduta, dopo l'accusa di tradimento lanciata contro Dumouriez (1739 - 1823) e i suoi sostenitori.
Di fatto, il Barone de Batz è stato capace di intrigare questa accusa come lui stesso era stato tradito da Dumouriez.
Questo non gli aveva portato il sostegno dei suoi uomini finalmente, la mattina del 21 gennaio 1793, su Boulevard Bonne Nouvelle a Parigi. E aveva costretto de Batz a procedere ancora un po`più lontano, nonostante i 12.000 uomini armati di fucili a baionetta del cordone di sicurezza, con l'operazione di salvataggio del Re : lungo il numero 52 rue de Beauregard ! Tuttavia, fu aiutato dalle particolarità di questa strada stretta e ripida nell'angolo, in cui la berlina del Re fu costretta a ralentare e frenare. Salto` immediatamente le caccole della berlina che apri` con qualcuno di "speciale", e scappo` molto rapidamente da un passagio ancora esistente accanto a questo numero, con un uomo che le guardie non riuscivano ad indovinare se era il Re e non il suo sosia, nella confuzione !
Interessante anche, va ricordato il nostro Barone è nato nel castello di Gouts (Landes, Aquitaine) !
Dumouriez che diventato sospetto per la Convenzione il 4 aprile 1793, potrebbe fuggire correndo nei campi. Ma non fu cosi`per "Philippe-Egalité" ("Phîlippe-Uguaglianza") che fu arrestato tre giorni dopo, e infine condannato a morte e ghigliottinato il 6 novembre 1793.
Vogliamo sottolineare que tutti hanno riconosciuto le capacità e l'incredibile coraggio del Barone de Batz, compresi i Revoluzionari. Gli ultimi rimasero senza parole, di fronte alla sua eroica audacia di uomo che non puo` morire !
Come abbiamo scritto prima, conosciamo solo le sue due operazioni di soccorso ultra-pericolose riguardanti Louis XVI e Marie-Antoinette a causa dei suoi nemici, come lui sempre li nego` nonostante tutte le prove.
Per fare un importante parallelo, grandi misteri sono stati fatti per troppo tempo intorno alla sostituzione del loro figlio, Louis XVII (1785 - 1860)...con il figlio ritardato del Marchese de Jarjayes nella prigione di Temple il 19 gennaio 1794 dal Conte di Courtenay - un parente del Re d'Inghilterra - e la sua assistente polposa, la gracioza signorina Barett (Servizi Segreti Britannici).
Ed è certo che per più di due secoli, ha permesso che le fini nebulose di Louis XVI e Marie-Antoinette non fossero studiate più attentamente, aiutando la creazione di una mitologia discutibile.
Tornando al Barone Jean de Batz (a volte chiamato "Jean-Pierre de Batz"), era estremamente intelligente, giocato d'astuzia...e fortunato. Molte volte avrebbe dovuto farsi intrapolare da Robespierre, ma poteva sempre fuggire grazie alla sua grande arte dell'improvvisazione.
Come un'anguilla scivolava sempre tra le goffe dita di Robespierre.
Si sa che era anche responsabile delle sue insonnie !
E fino alla fine Massimiliano ebbe incubi a causa sua : durante la Rivoluzione, solo Jean de Batz era in grado di causarli questo costante stress. Era la sua bestia nera !
Ricordiamo che Jean de Batz era Colonnello nell'esercito di Louis XVI (Luigi XVI), e che poteva contare sul suo piccolo esercito di 2.000 uomini sparsi nella regione Parigina. E questo è senza contare gli agenti e i correspondenti che teneva in tutta la Francia e all'estero, da quando era Segretario del Gabinetto Nero del Re (cosi` il Capo dei Servizi Segreti del Re) !
Durante il Terrore, fu abbastanza intelligente e audace per avere incontri molto discreti con la gente della Commune di Parigi, la Convenzione...e anche alcuni membri del Comitato di Publicca Sicurezza [Claude Basire (1764 - 1794), Delaunay D'angers (1752 - 1794), e il fortunato Julien de Toulouse (1750 - 1828)]. Non stupefacente che Robespierre ha fatto incubi, e quasi "l'insonnia di giorno" su qualcuno che segretamente lo stava provocando - praticamente sotto il suo naso !
Alla fine della Rivoluzione, durante il 13 Vendémiaire, anno IV (5 ottobre 1795), Jean de Batz fu sospettato di essere il cervello della Rivolta Monarchica.
Quest'ultima fu ufficialmente schiacciata dall'artiglieria di Napoléon Bonaparte (1769 - 1821), nella parte anteriore della chiesa di Saint Roch a Parigi.
E questa volta, de Batz fu catturato come l'organizzatore superiore da dietro.
Eppure, nessuno sa come sia riuscito esattamente...ma è stato rilasciato piuttosto velocemente, e tutte le accuse sono state abbandonate contro di lui. Si dice comunque la sua futura moglie, Mademoiselle Thilorier, e una amica, la "Marchesa di Janson" di cui abbiamo parlato nel nostro precedente articolo (come possible nome di copertina di fuga per la Regina Marie-Antoinette) le hanno aiutato discretamente...cosi` nessuna prova materiale circa la sua implicazione in questa Insurrezione potrebbe essere trovata !
Alla fine del nostro sviluppo, è ovvio che il Barone de Batz fu un attore importante della Storia Francese, anche solo poche persone hanno studato i suoi resultati più audaci.
Per essere comprensivi, dobbiamo anche menzionare i suoi innegabili colpi di fortuna, e anche la sua buona fortuna con le donne !
Fu adulato dalla sua futura moglie e dalla "Marchesa di Janson", che lo considerava come l'Uomo in tutto il suo splendore, dignoso dei più grandi Eroi dell'Antichità : la prima, per amore e passione, e la seconda con una devota amicizia perché gli aveva salvato la vita da una morte orribile e ignobile.
Va agiunto, che l'Insurrezione sopra citata non aveva realmente fallita : l'obbietivo del Barone de Batz era sempre stato quello di portare questa Rivoluzione - vista come innganevole e inhumana - una fine. Ed è esattamente quello che è successo tre settimane dopo con un nuovo regime sorprendente, che sembra provenire dal nulla : il "Direttorio" (26 ottobre 1795 - 10 novembre 1799) !
E c'è qualche cosa di buffo, nel fatto che Jean de Batz sia stato possibilmente aiutato e protetto...dalla Regina di Francia (alias la "Marchesa di Janson") per terminare la Rivoluzione !
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)